A post-occupancy evaluation study of a mixed-income gated community in Cibubur, West Java, Indonesia

IF 0.6 Q4 URBAN STUDIES
Maria Lestari Olivia, J. Adianto, R. T. Gabe
{"title":"A post-occupancy evaluation study of a mixed-income gated community in Cibubur, West Java, Indonesia","authors":"Maria Lestari Olivia, J. Adianto, R. T. Gabe","doi":"10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2019-30-02-003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gated communities (GCs) have been demonized as a malicious form of urban segregation because they provide a secure neighbourhood and exclusive facilities. The\nobjective of the Indonesian government policy related to balanced housing is to create mixed-income housing in order to foster interaction between social classes in neighbourhoods and reduce the alarming social gap. This study seeks to validate the occurrence of social interaction among different economic strata in a mixed-income\nGC. To understand social interaction among its residents, the reasons why residents from different economic strata selected their housing are examined. The research\nmethodology includes a post-occupancy evaluation in a mixed-income GC in Cibubur, West Java, Indonesia, an area known for its high quality neighbourhoods and facilities. This study identifies security as a major housing preference factor for many people living in a mixed-income GC. However, the reduced exclusivity of such facilities decreases their usage frequency, giving rise to trans-cluster social interaction within the same class. This finding contradicts the objective of the balanced housing policy because the residents interact with others in a similar social class beyond the segregated walls of the housing clusters.","PeriodicalId":54093,"journal":{"name":"Urbani Izziv-Urban Challenge","volume":"2 1","pages":"95-104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urbani Izziv-Urban Challenge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2019-30-02-003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Gated communities (GCs) have been demonized as a malicious form of urban segregation because they provide a secure neighbourhood and exclusive facilities. The objective of the Indonesian government policy related to balanced housing is to create mixed-income housing in order to foster interaction between social classes in neighbourhoods and reduce the alarming social gap. This study seeks to validate the occurrence of social interaction among different economic strata in a mixed-income GC. To understand social interaction among its residents, the reasons why residents from different economic strata selected their housing are examined. The research methodology includes a post-occupancy evaluation in a mixed-income GC in Cibubur, West Java, Indonesia, an area known for its high quality neighbourhoods and facilities. This study identifies security as a major housing preference factor for many people living in a mixed-income GC. However, the reduced exclusivity of such facilities decreases their usage frequency, giving rise to trans-cluster social interaction within the same class. This finding contradicts the objective of the balanced housing policy because the residents interact with others in a similar social class beyond the segregated walls of the housing clusters.
印度尼西亚西爪哇Cibubur一个混合收入封闭式社区的入住后评价研究
封闭社区(GC)被妖魔化为一种恶意的城市隔离形式,因为它们提供了一个安全的社区和专属设施。印度尼西亚政府关于平衡住房政策的目标是建立混合收入住房,以促进社区社会阶层之间的互动,并缩小令人担忧的社会差距。本研究试图验证在混合收入GC中不同经济阶层之间社会互动的发生。为了了解其居民之间的社会互动,研究了不同经济阶层的居民选择住房的原因。研究方法包括在印度尼西亚西爪哇省锡布布尔的一个混合收入GC中进行入住后评估,该地区以其高质量的社区和设施而闻名。这项研究确定,对于许多生活在混合收入GC的人来说,安全是一个主要的住房偏好因素。然而,此类设施的排他性降低了其使用频率,导致了同一阶层内的跨集群社会互动。这一发现与平衡住房政策的目标相矛盾,因为居民在住房集群的隔离墙之外与类似社会阶层的其他人互动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
审稿时长
32 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信