Inequalities and Institutions that Benefit Good Apples

IF 4.1 4区管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT

Journal of Management Inquiry Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI:10.1177/10564926211030430

Charlene Zietsma

引用次数: 1

Abstract

I describe three types of inequalities that benefit “good apples” and harm women in Academe: inequality of recognition, inequality of effort required, and inequality in societal institutions around home and career. I then describe three hard things that “good apples” can do, focusing on the institutional level: building awareness, changing structures and adapting social norms.

查看原文本刊更多论文

有利于好苹果的不平等和制度

我描述了三种有利于“好苹果”而伤害学术界女性的不平等:认可的不平等，所需努力的不平等，以及家庭和职业社会制度的不平等。然后，我描述了“好苹果”可以做的三件困难的事情，重点放在制度层面:建立意识、改变结构和适应社会规范。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Management Inquiry MANAGEMENT-

CiteScore

8.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Management Inquiry, sponsored by the Western Academy of Management, is a refereed journal for scholars and professionals in management, organizational behavior, strategy, and human resources. Its intent is to explore ideas and build knowledge in management theory and practice, with a focus on creative, nontraditional research as well as key controversies in the field. The journal seeks to maintain a constructive balance between innovation and quality, and at the same time widely define the forms that relevant contributions to the field can take. JMI features six sections: Meet the Person, Provocations, Reflections on Experience, Nontraditional Research, Essays, and Dialog.