Burn documentation in emergency department files and its impact on admission or discharge

Q3 Medicine
Ori Berger , Mor Mendelson , Ran Talisman
{"title":"Burn documentation in emergency department files and its impact on admission or discharge","authors":"Ori Berger ,&nbsp;Mor Mendelson ,&nbsp;Ran Talisman","doi":"10.1016/j.burnso.2023.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Accurate burn injury documentation is crucial for management. The four crucial elements of burn injury documentation are location, etiology, degree, and total body surface area. In our emergency room (ER), ER physicians primarily provide initial care. We aim to evaluate their assessment of the 4 Crucial Elements and their correlation to in-house care or discharge.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective ER charts study was conducted using ICD-9 codes for burn injury. Every tenth file was retrieved for detailed review, and burns' characteristics and management were examined. Chi-squared test was used on the data for analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We examined 301 patient files. Location was always stated. Only 43% had a complete description. Etiology was missing in 7%, burn degree in 18.5%, and TBSA in 67.5% of files. Patients with full descriptions had a statistically significant higher admission rate than those with partial documentation (P &lt; 0.035), indicating a relationship between full documentation and the need for admission.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The study found incomplete documentation of burn injuries by non-burn physicians in the ER, leading to an impact on patient care decisions. There is a need for education and training to improve documentation quality, and the inclusion of burn-care rotations in medical education and residency programs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72486,"journal":{"name":"Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries","volume":"7 4","pages":"Pages 103-106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468912223000275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Accurate burn injury documentation is crucial for management. The four crucial elements of burn injury documentation are location, etiology, degree, and total body surface area. In our emergency room (ER), ER physicians primarily provide initial care. We aim to evaluate their assessment of the 4 Crucial Elements and their correlation to in-house care or discharge.

Methods

A retrospective ER charts study was conducted using ICD-9 codes for burn injury. Every tenth file was retrieved for detailed review, and burns' characteristics and management were examined. Chi-squared test was used on the data for analysis.

Results

We examined 301 patient files. Location was always stated. Only 43% had a complete description. Etiology was missing in 7%, burn degree in 18.5%, and TBSA in 67.5% of files. Patients with full descriptions had a statistically significant higher admission rate than those with partial documentation (P < 0.035), indicating a relationship between full documentation and the need for admission.

Conclusions

The study found incomplete documentation of burn injuries by non-burn physicians in the ER, leading to an impact on patient care decisions. There is a need for education and training to improve documentation quality, and the inclusion of burn-care rotations in medical education and residency programs.

急诊科档案中的烧伤记录及其对入院或出院的影响
背景:准确的烧伤记录对治疗至关重要。烧伤记录的四个关键要素是部位、病因、程度和全身表面积。在我们的急诊室(ER),急诊医生主要提供初步护理。我们的目标是评估他们对4个关键要素的评估及其与内部护理或出院的相关性。方法采用ICD-9编码对烧伤患者进行回顾性急诊图表研究。每10个文件被检索进行详细审查,并检查烧伤的特征和管理。数据采用卡方检验进行分析。结果共检查了301例患者档案。地点总是写明的。只有43%的人有完整的描述。病因不明占7%,烧伤程度占18.5%,TBSA占67.5%。有完整描述的患者入院率比有部分描述的患者高(P <0.035),表明充分的文件和入学需要之间的关系。研究发现,急诊室非烧伤医生对烧伤的记录不完整,这影响了患者的护理决策。有必要进行教育和培训,以提高文献质量,并将烧伤护理轮转纳入医学教育和住院医师计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信