Implementation of the Family Violence Option 20 Years Later: A Review of State Welfare Rules for Domestic Violence Survivors

Stephanie Holcomb, Laura Johnson, Andrea Hetling, Judy L. Postmus, Jordan J Steiner, Larry Braasch, A. Riordan
{"title":"Implementation of the Family Violence Option 20 Years Later: A Review of State Welfare Rules for Domestic Violence Survivors","authors":"Stephanie Holcomb, Laura Johnson, Andrea Hetling, Judy L. Postmus, Jordan J Steiner, Larry Braasch, A. Riordan","doi":"10.1080/15588742.2017.1311820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The Family Violence Option (FVO) was included in the 1996 welfare reform legislation to ensure that domestic violence survivors are not subject to unfair penalties resulting from compliance with the new requirements. This study presents a comprehensive review of the states’ different approaches to address domestic violence. Our findings identified variation in implementation and practice, from the decision to adopt the FVO to the process of granting waivers. Although not contradictory to the federal legislation, the variation is indicative of the limited research on best practices and lack of national discussions on how state FVO processes relate to one another.","PeriodicalId":91762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of policy practice","volume":"16 1","pages":"415 - 431"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15588742.2017.1311820","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of policy practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15588742.2017.1311820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Family Violence Option (FVO) was included in the 1996 welfare reform legislation to ensure that domestic violence survivors are not subject to unfair penalties resulting from compliance with the new requirements. This study presents a comprehensive review of the states’ different approaches to address domestic violence. Our findings identified variation in implementation and practice, from the decision to adopt the FVO to the process of granting waivers. Although not contradictory to the federal legislation, the variation is indicative of the limited research on best practices and lack of national discussions on how state FVO processes relate to one another.
20年后家庭暴力选项的实施:对家庭暴力幸存者国家福利规则的审查
摘要家庭暴力选项(FVO)被纳入1996年的福利改革立法,以确保家庭暴力幸存者不会因遵守新要求而受到不公平的惩罚。这项研究对各州处理家庭暴力的不同方法进行了全面审查。我们的研究结果确定了实施和实践中的差异,从采用FVO的决定到授予豁免的过程。尽管与联邦立法并不矛盾,但这种变化表明,对最佳实践的研究有限,并且缺乏关于州FVO流程如何相互关联的全国性讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书