Reading for pleasure practices in school: children’s perspectives and experiences

IF 2.7 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Emily Oxley, Sarah McGeown
{"title":"Reading for pleasure practices in school: children’s perspectives and experiences","authors":"Emily Oxley, Sarah McGeown","doi":"10.1080/00131881.2023.2236123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background In many educational systems internationally, promoting reading for pleasure (RfP) is embedded within curricula and practice. Primary school teachers regularly and routinely engage in activities designed to encourage and sustain children’s reading enjoyment. However, what are children’s perspectives and experiences of these different practices? Purpose This study sought to: (i) identify relevant research aligned with common classroom RfP practices and (ii) understand children’s perspectives and experiences of these. Methods For (i), a literature review was undertaken to identify research relevant to RfP practices. For (ii), a total of 59 children (51% female) aged 8–11 from four demographically diverse UK schools (2 in Scotland, 2 in England) participated in individual or small group interviews, depending on their preference, to discuss their RfP perspectives and experiences. Data were analysed qualitatively. Findings The analysis indicated the diversity of children’s perspectives and experiences of RfP practices. It allowed exploration of a range of experiences in relation to independent reading, teacher read-alouds, book-talk, reading diaries, quality of book provision, use of technology, annual events and the use of rewards. Conclusions This study provides insight into children’s perspectives and experiences in relation to common classroom practices designed to promote RfP. It points to the need for more research to support teachers’ understanding of the effectiveness of these different practices, and the ways in which they can be enacted to optimise children’s reading experiences and outcomes. Indeed, it draws attention to a disconnect between classroom practice and academic research, raising important issues around classroom practice informing research priorities.","PeriodicalId":47607,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2023.2236123","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background In many educational systems internationally, promoting reading for pleasure (RfP) is embedded within curricula and practice. Primary school teachers regularly and routinely engage in activities designed to encourage and sustain children’s reading enjoyment. However, what are children’s perspectives and experiences of these different practices? Purpose This study sought to: (i) identify relevant research aligned with common classroom RfP practices and (ii) understand children’s perspectives and experiences of these. Methods For (i), a literature review was undertaken to identify research relevant to RfP practices. For (ii), a total of 59 children (51% female) aged 8–11 from four demographically diverse UK schools (2 in Scotland, 2 in England) participated in individual or small group interviews, depending on their preference, to discuss their RfP perspectives and experiences. Data were analysed qualitatively. Findings The analysis indicated the diversity of children’s perspectives and experiences of RfP practices. It allowed exploration of a range of experiences in relation to independent reading, teacher read-alouds, book-talk, reading diaries, quality of book provision, use of technology, annual events and the use of rewards. Conclusions This study provides insight into children’s perspectives and experiences in relation to common classroom practices designed to promote RfP. It points to the need for more research to support teachers’ understanding of the effectiveness of these different practices, and the ways in which they can be enacted to optimise children’s reading experiences and outcomes. Indeed, it draws attention to a disconnect between classroom practice and academic research, raising important issues around classroom practice informing research priorities.
在学校的快乐阅读实践:儿童的观点和经验
摘要背景在国际上许多教育体系中,促进快乐阅读(RfP)已纳入课程和实践。小学教师定期参加旨在鼓励和维持儿童阅读乐趣的活动。然而,孩子们对这些不同做法的看法和经历是什么?目的本研究旨在:(i)确定与常见课堂RfP实践相一致的相关研究,并(ii)了解儿童对这些实践的看法和体验。方法对于(i),进行文献综述,以确定与RfP实践相关的研究。对于(ii),来自四所人口结构不同的英国学校(苏格兰2所,英格兰2所)的59名8-11岁的儿童(51%为女性)根据他们的偏好参加了个人或小组访谈,讨论他们的RfP观点和经历。对数据进行了定性分析。研究结果分析表明,儿童对RfP实践的看法和经验是多样的。它允许探索与独立阅读、教师朗读、图书讲座、阅读日记、图书供应质量、技术使用、年度活动和奖励使用有关的一系列体验。结论本研究深入了解了儿童对旨在促进RfP的常见课堂实践的看法和经验。它指出,需要更多的研究来支持教师理解这些不同做法的有效性,以及如何实施这些做法来优化儿童的阅读体验和结果。事实上,它引起了人们对课堂实践和学术研究之间脱节的关注,提出了围绕课堂实践为研究重点提供信息的重要问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educational Research
Educational Research EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Educational Research, the journal of the National Foundation for Educational Research (NFER), was established in 1958. Drawing upon research projects in universities and research centres worldwide, it is the leading international forum for informed thinking on issues of contemporary concern in education. The journal is of interest to academics, researchers and those people concerned with mediating research findings to policy makers and practitioners. Educational Research has a broad scope and contains research studies, reviews of research, discussion pieces, short reports and book reviews in all areas of the education field.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信