{"title":"Reading for pleasure practices in school: children’s perspectives and experiences","authors":"Emily Oxley, Sarah McGeown","doi":"10.1080/00131881.2023.2236123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background In many educational systems internationally, promoting reading for pleasure (RfP) is embedded within curricula and practice. Primary school teachers regularly and routinely engage in activities designed to encourage and sustain children’s reading enjoyment. However, what are children’s perspectives and experiences of these different practices? Purpose This study sought to: (i) identify relevant research aligned with common classroom RfP practices and (ii) understand children’s perspectives and experiences of these. Methods For (i), a literature review was undertaken to identify research relevant to RfP practices. For (ii), a total of 59 children (51% female) aged 8–11 from four demographically diverse UK schools (2 in Scotland, 2 in England) participated in individual or small group interviews, depending on their preference, to discuss their RfP perspectives and experiences. Data were analysed qualitatively. Findings The analysis indicated the diversity of children’s perspectives and experiences of RfP practices. It allowed exploration of a range of experiences in relation to independent reading, teacher read-alouds, book-talk, reading diaries, quality of book provision, use of technology, annual events and the use of rewards. Conclusions This study provides insight into children’s perspectives and experiences in relation to common classroom practices designed to promote RfP. It points to the need for more research to support teachers’ understanding of the effectiveness of these different practices, and the ways in which they can be enacted to optimise children’s reading experiences and outcomes. Indeed, it draws attention to a disconnect between classroom practice and academic research, raising important issues around classroom practice informing research priorities.","PeriodicalId":47607,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research","volume":"65 1","pages":"375 - 391"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2023.2236123","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
ABSTRACT Background In many educational systems internationally, promoting reading for pleasure (RfP) is embedded within curricula and practice. Primary school teachers regularly and routinely engage in activities designed to encourage and sustain children’s reading enjoyment. However, what are children’s perspectives and experiences of these different practices? Purpose This study sought to: (i) identify relevant research aligned with common classroom RfP practices and (ii) understand children’s perspectives and experiences of these. Methods For (i), a literature review was undertaken to identify research relevant to RfP practices. For (ii), a total of 59 children (51% female) aged 8–11 from four demographically diverse UK schools (2 in Scotland, 2 in England) participated in individual or small group interviews, depending on their preference, to discuss their RfP perspectives and experiences. Data were analysed qualitatively. Findings The analysis indicated the diversity of children’s perspectives and experiences of RfP practices. It allowed exploration of a range of experiences in relation to independent reading, teacher read-alouds, book-talk, reading diaries, quality of book provision, use of technology, annual events and the use of rewards. Conclusions This study provides insight into children’s perspectives and experiences in relation to common classroom practices designed to promote RfP. It points to the need for more research to support teachers’ understanding of the effectiveness of these different practices, and the ways in which they can be enacted to optimise children’s reading experiences and outcomes. Indeed, it draws attention to a disconnect between classroom practice and academic research, raising important issues around classroom practice informing research priorities.
期刊介绍:
Educational Research, the journal of the National Foundation for Educational Research (NFER), was established in 1958. Drawing upon research projects in universities and research centres worldwide, it is the leading international forum for informed thinking on issues of contemporary concern in education. The journal is of interest to academics, researchers and those people concerned with mediating research findings to policy makers and practitioners. Educational Research has a broad scope and contains research studies, reviews of research, discussion pieces, short reports and book reviews in all areas of the education field.