Impact of Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Recuperation of Moderate-to-Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients in Western India

Manoj K. Singh, K. Annamalai
{"title":"Impact of Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Recuperation of Moderate-to-Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients in Western India","authors":"Manoj K. Singh, K. Annamalai","doi":"10.4103/am.am_99_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) virus has caused widespread Acute Respiratory Disease globally since 2020. Patients with evidence of lower respiratory illness either clinically or radiologically had moderate-to-severe illness. COVID respiratory and nonrespiratory symptoms (psychological and cognitive) noticed after 4–8 weeks of primary disease were called long COVID syndrome. Survivors of moderate-to-severe disease had a poor quality of life. The main objective of this retrospective study was to assess the role of outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) done in moderate-severe COVID-19 survivors who had symptoms after 4–8 weeks at Shaivam Lung Rehabilitation Centre, Ahmedabad.\n \n \n \n We analyzed the impact of PR on 30 patients’ post-COVID-19 who were willing to participate during the ongoing pandemic. It was an outpatient 6–8 weeks of program designed to target respiratory and general muscle training, relaxation technique, nutritional counseling, occupational and psychological support. Patients were tested with of combination of self-assessment quality of life scale (adapted from short form 36 questionnaire), muscle training, dyspnea scale, and physical assessment. The standard objective assessment included oxygenation index (SpO2/FiO2 ratio), 6 min walk distance (6 MWD), Modified Medical Research Council (MMRC) score, manual muscle testing (MMT) along with pulmonary function testing. All these subjective and objective variables were tested pre- and post-PR program to assess the impact on defined parameters.\n \n \n \n From December 2020 to March 2022, we studied the impact of PR on 30 out of 55 patients fitting into the inclusion criteria. Significant benefit was noted in subjective Short Form 36 (SF 36) score and objective (6 MWD, MMRC, oxygenation, MMT) quality of life post-PR program (P < 0.001). Improvement in spirometry was not statistically significant, indicating structural chronicity of COVID pulmonary fibrosis.\n \n \n \n PR is safe, effective, and feasible on an outpatient basis in COVID-19 survivors of illness with poor quality of life. Further research is required to prove its widespread benefit in such patients.\n","PeriodicalId":34670,"journal":{"name":"Apollo Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Apollo Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/am.am_99_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) virus has caused widespread Acute Respiratory Disease globally since 2020. Patients with evidence of lower respiratory illness either clinically or radiologically had moderate-to-severe illness. COVID respiratory and nonrespiratory symptoms (psychological and cognitive) noticed after 4–8 weeks of primary disease were called long COVID syndrome. Survivors of moderate-to-severe disease had a poor quality of life. The main objective of this retrospective study was to assess the role of outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) done in moderate-severe COVID-19 survivors who had symptoms after 4–8 weeks at Shaivam Lung Rehabilitation Centre, Ahmedabad. We analyzed the impact of PR on 30 patients’ post-COVID-19 who were willing to participate during the ongoing pandemic. It was an outpatient 6–8 weeks of program designed to target respiratory and general muscle training, relaxation technique, nutritional counseling, occupational and psychological support. Patients were tested with of combination of self-assessment quality of life scale (adapted from short form 36 questionnaire), muscle training, dyspnea scale, and physical assessment. The standard objective assessment included oxygenation index (SpO2/FiO2 ratio), 6 min walk distance (6 MWD), Modified Medical Research Council (MMRC) score, manual muscle testing (MMT) along with pulmonary function testing. All these subjective and objective variables were tested pre- and post-PR program to assess the impact on defined parameters. From December 2020 to March 2022, we studied the impact of PR on 30 out of 55 patients fitting into the inclusion criteria. Significant benefit was noted in subjective Short Form 36 (SF 36) score and objective (6 MWD, MMRC, oxygenation, MMT) quality of life post-PR program (P < 0.001). Improvement in spirometry was not statistically significant, indicating structural chronicity of COVID pulmonary fibrosis. PR is safe, effective, and feasible on an outpatient basis in COVID-19 survivors of illness with poor quality of life. Further research is required to prove its widespread benefit in such patients.
肺部康复对印度西部2019中至重度冠状病毒病患者康复的影响
自2020年以来,2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)病毒已在全球范围内引起广泛的急性呼吸道疾病。临床或放射学上有下呼吸道疾病证据的患者患有中度至重度疾病。原发性疾病4-8周后出现的新冠肺炎呼吸和非呼吸症状(心理和认知)被称为长期新冠肺炎综合征。中度至重度疾病的幸存者生活质量较差。这项回顾性研究的主要目的是评估门诊肺康复(PR)在艾哈迈达巴德Shaivam肺康复中心4-8周后出现症状的中度新冠肺炎幸存者中的作用。我们分析了PR对30名愿意在持续大流行期间参与的COVID-19后患者的影响。这是一项为期6-8周的门诊计划,旨在针对呼吸和全身肌肉训练、放松技巧、营养咨询、职业和心理支持。采用自评生活质量量表(改编自36份简短问卷)、肌肉训练、呼吸困难量表和身体评估相结合的方法对患者进行测试。标准客观评估包括氧合指数(SpO2/FiO2比率)、6分钟步行距离(6 MWD)、改良医学研究委员会(MMRC)评分、手动肌肉测试(MMT)以及肺功能测试。所有这些主观和客观变量都在PR项目前后进行了测试,以评估对定义参数的影响。从2020年12月到2022年3月,我们研究了PR对符合纳入标准的55名患者中的30名患者的影响。PR项目后,主观简表36(SF 36)评分和客观(6 MWD、MMRC、氧合、MMT)生活质量显著改善(P<0.001)。肺活量测定的改善没有统计学意义,表明新冠肺炎肺纤维化的结构慢性性。在生活质量差的新冠肺炎疾病幸存者的门诊基础上,PR是安全、有效和可行的。需要进一步的研究来证明它在这类患者中的广泛益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信