Counting to 37: Sir Richard Carnac Temple and the Thirty-Eighth Nat

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Sally Bamford
{"title":"Counting to 37: Sir Richard Carnac Temple and the Thirty-Eighth Nat","authors":"Sally Bamford","doi":"10.1353/jbs.2019.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Burma's nats have formed part of that country's spiritual and material culture for centuries, and first came to the attention of the West via traveler and colonial memoirs. The most notable of these such accounts is undoubtedly Sir Richard Carnac Temple's The Thirty-Seven Nats: A Phase of Spirit-Worship Prevailing in Burma, published in 1906 and still cited by scholars today.This article argues that the reliance by Western (and some Burmese) authors on Temple's book has led to several misconceptions concerning the nats. These include, for example, that the pantheon known in the West as \"The Thirty-Seven Nats\" is a royal pantheon constituted by Anawrahta in the 11th century, under the leadership of Thakya Min (Sakka), in order to enfold the nats into Buddhism. Yet primary sources, including Burmese court documents, paint a much fuller picture of the nats, detailing three separate pantheons of 37. Each pantheon contains very different types of nat, each of which played a specific role throughout Burma's history.Following a clarification of these pantheons, this paper draws on extant primary sources to suggest a different interpretation of the \"Thirty-Seven Nats\" and their role vis-à-vis Burma's kings. The source material available to R.C. Temple is also considered, which reveals significant information which Temple overlooked when writing his book. This led, in turn, to wrongly identified illustrations included in his book, which obscured the identity of a \"Thirty-Eighth Nat.\" These errors have also had an impact on how one of the most prominent nats is depicted in more recent publications.","PeriodicalId":53638,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burma Studies","volume":"23 1","pages":"163 - 252"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/jbs.2019.0010","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burma Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jbs.2019.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Burma's nats have formed part of that country's spiritual and material culture for centuries, and first came to the attention of the West via traveler and colonial memoirs. The most notable of these such accounts is undoubtedly Sir Richard Carnac Temple's The Thirty-Seven Nats: A Phase of Spirit-Worship Prevailing in Burma, published in 1906 and still cited by scholars today.This article argues that the reliance by Western (and some Burmese) authors on Temple's book has led to several misconceptions concerning the nats. These include, for example, that the pantheon known in the West as "The Thirty-Seven Nats" is a royal pantheon constituted by Anawrahta in the 11th century, under the leadership of Thakya Min (Sakka), in order to enfold the nats into Buddhism. Yet primary sources, including Burmese court documents, paint a much fuller picture of the nats, detailing three separate pantheons of 37. Each pantheon contains very different types of nat, each of which played a specific role throughout Burma's history.Following a clarification of these pantheons, this paper draws on extant primary sources to suggest a different interpretation of the "Thirty-Seven Nats" and their role vis-à-vis Burma's kings. The source material available to R.C. Temple is also considered, which reveals significant information which Temple overlooked when writing his book. This led, in turn, to wrongly identified illustrations included in his book, which obscured the identity of a "Thirty-Eighth Nat." These errors have also had an impact on how one of the most prominent nats is depicted in more recent publications.
数到37:理查德·卡纳克·坦普尔爵士和第三十八世纪
摘要:几个世纪以来,缅甸的民族构成了该国精神和物质文化的一部分,并通过旅行者和殖民回忆录首次引起西方的注意。这些记录中最著名的无疑是理查德·卡纳克·坦普尔爵士的《三十七个民族:缅甸盛行的精神崇拜阶段》,出版于1906年,至今仍被学者引用。这篇文章认为,西方(和一些缅甸)作者对邓波儿的书的依赖导致了一些关于国家的误解。例如,在西方被称为“三十七国”的万神殿是一个皇家万神殿,在十一世纪由阿那若塔在他迦明(Sakka)的领导下建立,目的是将各国纳入佛教。然而,包括缅甸法庭文件在内的原始资料,描绘了一幅更全面的国家图景,详细描述了三个独立的37个万神殿。每个万神殿都包含不同类型的nat,每一个都在缅甸历史上扮演着特定的角色。在对这些万神殿进行澄清之后,本文利用现存的原始资料提出了对“三十七国”及其相对-à-vis缅甸国王的角色的不同解释。R.C. Temple的原始资料也被考虑在内,其中揭示了Temple在写作时忽略的重要信息。这反过来又导致了他的书中包含的错误识别的插图,这些插图模糊了“第三十八Nat”的身份。这些错误也影响了最近的出版物如何描述这个最重要的国家之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Burma Studies
Journal of Burma Studies Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信