To Shake or Not to Shake: Can Bacterial Cross-contamination Occur from Handshaking in Healthcare Settings?

Vahid Mesgarzadeh, M. H. Motamedi, H. Hooshangi, M. Rezaei, H. Akhlagh, Z. Danial
{"title":"To Shake or Not to Shake: Can Bacterial Cross-contamination Occur from Handshaking in Healthcare Settings?","authors":"Vahid Mesgarzadeh, M. H. Motamedi, H. Hooshangi, M. Rezaei, H. Akhlagh, Z. Danial","doi":"10.31021/jddm.20181119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bacterial Contamination Transferred Through Handshaking Transfer of bacteria through handshaking in the clinical setting is an issue of concern and warranting investigation. Handshaking may be a likely mode for transmission of microorganisms [1]. Transfer of pathogenic microorganisms in the clinical environment is important because healthcare professionals and students are at risk. Contamination from instruments that can become vectors of cross-infection [2,3] may harbor pathogens such as Streptococcus pneumoniae, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila and Pseudomonas aeruginosa which have been implicated in crosscontamination [4]. Sklansky [5] proposed banning the handshake from the health care setting. Handshaking a cultural tradition that has evolved over centuries as a general gesture of peace [6] may serve as a route for transfer of microorganisms via the hands of healthcare workers, and students. Survivals of bacteria on the hands vary among pathogens. Studies done in the environmental setting show that handshaking can actually transfer pathogens [7]. Even spores of Clostridium difficile have been shown to be transferred via handshaking [5] as have Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas and Staphylococcus aureus [8]. Bacterial contamination in the ward has been shown to be less with “fist bumping” as compared with handshaking. The WHO states hand-transmitted bacteria are still abundant in hospitals [9]. We recently undertook a study wherein we initially swabbed 76 students upon entry to the ward and again after shaking hands with their classmates and colleagues. After taking samples and culturing we observed Staphylococcus epidermidis, Micrococcus and Peptostreptococcus in 100, 39.5 and 32.9% of the subjects, respectively. Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus Spores, Actinomyces and Klebsiella were detected in 30.3, 23.7, 13.15 and 13.15% of the students, respectively. Transfer of bacterial contamination after handshaking significantly increased for Staphylococcus epidermidis from 93.4 to 97% (P < 0.001). Bacillus anthracis and Micrococcus increased from 39.5 to 89.5% and 32.9 to 83.9%, respectively (P < 0.001). Bacterial contamination for Peptostreptococcus increased from 30.3 to 80.3%, Staphylococcus aureus 23.7 to 40.8%, Spore Bacillus 13.15 to 22.4%, Klebsiella 13.15 to 22.4 and Actinomyces 13.15 to 18.4%. These results suggest that handshaking can indeed be a mode of microbial transfer and bacterial cross-contamination which may be dangerous especially in immunocompromised subjects.","PeriodicalId":93308,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry and dental medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry and dental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31021/jddm.20181119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bacterial Contamination Transferred Through Handshaking Transfer of bacteria through handshaking in the clinical setting is an issue of concern and warranting investigation. Handshaking may be a likely mode for transmission of microorganisms [1]. Transfer of pathogenic microorganisms in the clinical environment is important because healthcare professionals and students are at risk. Contamination from instruments that can become vectors of cross-infection [2,3] may harbor pathogens such as Streptococcus pneumoniae, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila and Pseudomonas aeruginosa which have been implicated in crosscontamination [4]. Sklansky [5] proposed banning the handshake from the health care setting. Handshaking a cultural tradition that has evolved over centuries as a general gesture of peace [6] may serve as a route for transfer of microorganisms via the hands of healthcare workers, and students. Survivals of bacteria on the hands vary among pathogens. Studies done in the environmental setting show that handshaking can actually transfer pathogens [7]. Even spores of Clostridium difficile have been shown to be transferred via handshaking [5] as have Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas and Staphylococcus aureus [8]. Bacterial contamination in the ward has been shown to be less with “fist bumping” as compared with handshaking. The WHO states hand-transmitted bacteria are still abundant in hospitals [9]. We recently undertook a study wherein we initially swabbed 76 students upon entry to the ward and again after shaking hands with their classmates and colleagues. After taking samples and culturing we observed Staphylococcus epidermidis, Micrococcus and Peptostreptococcus in 100, 39.5 and 32.9% of the subjects, respectively. Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus Spores, Actinomyces and Klebsiella were detected in 30.3, 23.7, 13.15 and 13.15% of the students, respectively. Transfer of bacterial contamination after handshaking significantly increased for Staphylococcus epidermidis from 93.4 to 97% (P < 0.001). Bacillus anthracis and Micrococcus increased from 39.5 to 89.5% and 32.9 to 83.9%, respectively (P < 0.001). Bacterial contamination for Peptostreptococcus increased from 30.3 to 80.3%, Staphylococcus aureus 23.7 to 40.8%, Spore Bacillus 13.15 to 22.4%, Klebsiella 13.15 to 22.4 and Actinomyces 13.15 to 18.4%. These results suggest that handshaking can indeed be a mode of microbial transfer and bacterial cross-contamination which may be dangerous especially in immunocompromised subjects.
握手还是不握手:在医疗机构中握手会导致细菌交叉污染吗?
通过握手传播细菌污染在临床环境中,通过握手传播细菌是一个值得关注和值得调查的问题。握手可能是微生物传播的一种方式。临床环境中病原微生物的转移很重要,因为医疗保健专业人员和学生处于危险之中。来自仪器的污染可能成为交叉感染的媒介[2,3],可能含有肺炎链球菌、结核分枝杆菌、大肠杆菌、肺炎克雷伯菌、嗜肺军团菌和铜绿假单胞菌等病原体,这些病原体与交叉污染有关。斯克兰斯基建议在医疗场所禁止握手。握手作为一种普遍的和平手势,已经发展了几个世纪的文化传统,可能成为微生物通过医护人员和学生的手传播的途径。细菌在手上的存活率因病原体而异。在环境环境中进行的研究表明,握手实际上可以传播病原体。甚至艰难梭状芽孢杆菌的孢子也被证明可以通过握手传播,肠杆菌科、假单胞菌和金黄色葡萄球菌也是如此。在病房里,与握手相比,“碰拳”的细菌污染更少。世界卫生组织表示,医院里手传细菌仍然大量存在。我们最近进行了一项研究,我们首先在76名学生进入病房时擦拭,并在与他们的同学和同事握手后再次擦拭。经取样培养,表皮葡萄球菌、微球菌和胃链球菌的检出率分别为100、39.5%和32.9%。金黄色葡萄球菌、芽孢杆菌、放线菌和克雷伯菌检出率分别为30.3%、23.7%、13.15%和13.15%。握手后表皮葡萄球菌污染转移率从93.4%显著增加到97% (P < 0.001)。炭疽芽孢杆菌和微球菌分别从39.5%增加到89.5%和32.9增加到83.9% (P < 0.001)。细菌污染从30.3%增加到80.3%,金黄色葡萄球菌从23.7%增加到40.8%,孢子杆菌从13.15增加到22.4%,克雷伯菌从13.15增加到22.4,放线菌从13.15增加到18.4%。这些结果表明,握手确实可能是微生物转移和细菌交叉污染的一种方式,这可能是危险的,特别是在免疫功能低下的受试者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信