Revisiting the Dominant Discourse on Conditionality in the EU: The Case of EU Spending Conditionality

Q1 Social Sciences

Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies Pub Date : 2017-08-09 DOI:10.1017/cel.2017.4

V. Viță

引用次数: 17

Abstract

Abstract This article maps the rise of EU spending conditionality in the 2014–20 financial period and shows how the study of this novel type of conditionality adds to the dominant legal discourse on conditionality in the EU. It also suggests that the rise of conditionality may signal more profound transformations in the deep tissue of the EU, expressed by a transition towards a conditionality-based culture within the EU internal relationships.

查看原文本刊更多论文

重新审视欧盟中关于条件性的主流话语——以欧盟支出条件性为例

本文描绘了2014 - 2020财政期间欧盟支出条约性的兴起，并展示了对这种新型条约性的研究如何增加了欧盟关于条约性的主流法律话语。它还表明，条件性的增加可能标志着欧盟深层组织发生了更深刻的变化，表现为欧盟内部关系向条件性文化的转变。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

2.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies (CYELS) offers authors and readers a space for sustained reflection and conversation about the challenges facing Europe and the diverse legal contexts in which those challenges are addressed. It identifies European Legal Studies as a broad field of legal enquiry encompassing not only European Union law but also the law emanating from the Council of Europe; comparative European public and private law; and national law in its interaction with European legal sources. The Yearbook is a publication of the Centre for European Legal Studies, Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge.