Application of formative assessment in clinical skills simulated training course

Yuhuan Liang, Jing-ying Meng, Jianliang Qiao
{"title":"Application of formative assessment in clinical skills simulated training course","authors":"Yuhuan Liang, Jing-ying Meng, Jianliang Qiao","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.2095-1485.2020.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo explore the application of formative assessment in clinical skills simulated training course. \n \n \nMethod \ns The clinical skills simulated training course for excellent doctors in our school was selected as the research focus, students of Grade 2014 adopted traditional summative evaluation (control group), and the multi-station examination was used as evaluation method. Students of Grade 2015 adopted the formative evaluation on the basis of summative evaluation (experimental group), a diversified evaluation system was established, including inter-group evaluation by students, random evaluation by teachers, feedback of operation videos of different stages and real-time feedback of students' opinions after class. Questionnaires were conducted among students and teachers at the end of the course. \n \n \nResult \ns The scores of the experimental group were higher than those of the control group, with differences being statistically significant (P<0.05). Questionnaires showed that the proportion of \"good\" selected by teachers and students in the feedback of formative assessment was markedly higher than that of \"just so-so\" and \"bad\", indicating that formative assessment is conducive to increasing students' initiative for self-studying, improving students' learning effect, comprehensively and accurately evaluating students' clinical operational skills, as well as improving the teaching level of clinical practice skills. \n \n \nConclusion \nThe diversified evaluation system, which combines formative evaluation with summative evaluation, has achieved good teaching results in clinical skills simulated training course and it is worth to be widely applied. \n \n \nKey words: \nFormative assessment; Summative assessment; Clinical skills simulated training course","PeriodicalId":56557,"journal":{"name":"中华医学教育探索杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华医学教育探索杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.2095-1485.2020.02.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To explore the application of formative assessment in clinical skills simulated training course. Method s The clinical skills simulated training course for excellent doctors in our school was selected as the research focus, students of Grade 2014 adopted traditional summative evaluation (control group), and the multi-station examination was used as evaluation method. Students of Grade 2015 adopted the formative evaluation on the basis of summative evaluation (experimental group), a diversified evaluation system was established, including inter-group evaluation by students, random evaluation by teachers, feedback of operation videos of different stages and real-time feedback of students' opinions after class. Questionnaires were conducted among students and teachers at the end of the course. Result s The scores of the experimental group were higher than those of the control group, with differences being statistically significant (P<0.05). Questionnaires showed that the proportion of "good" selected by teachers and students in the feedback of formative assessment was markedly higher than that of "just so-so" and "bad", indicating that formative assessment is conducive to increasing students' initiative for self-studying, improving students' learning effect, comprehensively and accurately evaluating students' clinical operational skills, as well as improving the teaching level of clinical practice skills. Conclusion The diversified evaluation system, which combines formative evaluation with summative evaluation, has achieved good teaching results in clinical skills simulated training course and it is worth to be widely applied. Key words: Formative assessment; Summative assessment; Clinical skills simulated training course
形成性评价在临床技能模拟训练课程中的应用
目的探讨形成性评价在临床技能模拟训练课程中的应用。方法选择我校优秀医师临床技能模拟培训课程为研究重点,2014级学生采用传统的终结性评价(对照组),采用多站式考核作为评价方法。2015级学生采用终结性评价基础上的形成性评价(实验组),建立了多元化的评价体系,包括学生组间评价、教师随机评价、不同阶段操作视频反馈、课后实时反馈学生意见等。课程结束时,对学生和教师进行了问卷调查。结果实验组的得分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。问卷调查显示,教师和学生在形成性评价反馈中选择“好”的比例明显高于“一般”和“差”,表明形成性评价有利于提高学生自主学习的主动性,提高学生的学习效果,全面准确地评价学生的临床操作技能,提高临床实践技能的教学水平。结论形成性评价与终结性评价相结合的多元化评价体系在临床技能模拟培训课程中取得了良好的教学效果,值得推广应用。关键词:形成性评估;总结性评估;临床技能模拟培训课程
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5254
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信