Gender Differences in Social and Political Attitudes: It’s Protection versus Freedom, not Liberalism versus Conservatism

Q3 Arts and Humanities
G. Meisenberg
{"title":"Gender Differences in Social and Political Attitudes: It’s Protection versus Freedom, not Liberalism versus Conservatism","authors":"G. Meisenberg","doi":"10.46469/MQ.2021.61.3.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines sex differences in socio-political attitudes in the United States using the General Social Survey (GSS). It solves the seeming paradox that women have been described as both more religious and more liberal than men. The results indicate that women are indeed more religious than men and more socially conservative in many respects as indicated by earlier research in the United States and elsewhere. However, they are also more “economically liberal” in the US sense of favoring more social expenditures by the government. The observed differences do not fit the present political alignments of the United States. They rather indicate that women more than men are concerned about protecting people from economic hardship, from threats emerging from “non-standard” beliefs and worldviews, and from the darker side of their own nature. The sex differences can be described as lying on a protection versus freedom dimension, similar to what has been described for political alignments in many non-Western countries. At the level of specific issues, most sex differences have remained quite stable from the 1970s to the 2010s.","PeriodicalId":35516,"journal":{"name":"Mankind Quarterly","volume":"61 1","pages":"555-577"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mankind Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46469/MQ.2021.61.3.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines sex differences in socio-political attitudes in the United States using the General Social Survey (GSS). It solves the seeming paradox that women have been described as both more religious and more liberal than men. The results indicate that women are indeed more religious than men and more socially conservative in many respects as indicated by earlier research in the United States and elsewhere. However, they are also more “economically liberal” in the US sense of favoring more social expenditures by the government. The observed differences do not fit the present political alignments of the United States. They rather indicate that women more than men are concerned about protecting people from economic hardship, from threats emerging from “non-standard” beliefs and worldviews, and from the darker side of their own nature. The sex differences can be described as lying on a protection versus freedom dimension, similar to what has been described for political alignments in many non-Western countries. At the level of specific issues, most sex differences have remained quite stable from the 1970s to the 2010s.
社会和政治态度的性别差异:是保护与自由,而不是自由主义与保守主义
这项研究使用综合社会调查(GSS)调查了美国社会政治态度的性别差异。它解决了一个看似矛盾的问题,即女性被描述为比男性更虔诚、更自由。研究结果表明,正如美国和其他地方早期的研究所表明的那样,女性确实比男性更虔诚,在许多方面更保守。然而,在美国,他们也更“经济自由”,支持政府增加社会支出。观察到的分歧不符合美国目前的政治结盟。相反,他们表明,女性比男性更关心保护人们免受经济困难、“非标准”信仰和世界观带来的威胁,以及他们自身本性的阴暗面的影响。性别差异可以被描述为存在于保护与自由的层面,类似于许多非西方国家的政治结盟。在具体问题层面,从20世纪70年代到2010年代,大多数性别差异保持相当稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mankind Quarterly
Mankind Quarterly Social Sciences-Anthropology
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Mankind Quarterly was founded as a quarterly journal of anthropology, in the broadest sense of "the science of man," in 1961. This was a time when the "study of man" had already diversified into physical anthropology, ethnography, quantitative cross-cultural research, archaeology and other subspecialties. Psychological and linguistic approaches were explored but the genetic study of population structure and population history was still in its infancy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信