Objective and Subjective Assessment of the Sound Attenuation Efficiency Obtained by Custom Moulded Earplugs with Various Acoustic Filters – a Preliminary Study

IF 0.6 4区 物理与天体物理 Q4 ACOUSTICS
Roman Gołębiewski, A. Wicher, Artur Duraj, M. Kaczmarek-Klinowska, Karina Mrugalska-Handke
{"title":"Objective and Subjective Assessment of the Sound Attenuation Efficiency Obtained by Custom Moulded Earplugs with Various Acoustic Filters – a Preliminary Study","authors":"Roman Gołębiewski, A. Wicher, Artur Duraj, M. Kaczmarek-Klinowska, Karina Mrugalska-Handke","doi":"10.24425/aoa.2022.141650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Hearing loss caused by excessive exposure to noise is one of the most common health risks for employees. One solution for noise reduction is the use of hearing protectors, which is a very effective method for protecting hearing from the workplace noise. In order to obtain better attenuation efficiency, custom moulded earplugs can be equipped with a suitable acoustic filter. The effectiveness of the hearing protectors’ attenuation is based on real measurement of hearing thresholds for normal hearing people with and without hearing protectors. However, this is a time consuming process, and the obtained values are characterised by quite large inter-individual variability. The optimal solution is to measure the attenuation characteristics based on the objective method (without the presence of the subject), the results of which will be in accordance with the results of subjective tests. Therefore, the main purpose of the research in this work was to measure the attenuation characteristics of the self-designed custom moulded earplugs with and without acoustic filters through the use of subjective and objective methods, and to compare the results in terms of the research methods. Methods: Measurements of the acoustic attenuation obtained by custom moulded earplugs with designed F1, F2, and F3 acoustic filters (internal diameters d F1 = 1 . 25 mm, d F2 = 0 . 85 mm, and d F3 = 0 . 45 mm), as well as full insert earplugs (without any acoustic filters) were carried out using two methods: objective and subjective. The objective measurements were carried out in an anechoic chamber. The artificial head (High-frequency Head and Torso Simulator Brüel & Kjær Type 5128) was located at a distance of 3 m, directly opposite the loudspeaker. The test signal in the measurements was pink noise – in the frequency range up to 12.5 kHz and the level 85, 90, and 95 dB. The hearing protectors with and without acoustic filters were mounted in the Head and Torso Simulator which was connected with Pulse System Brüel & Kjær. Five normal hearing subjects participated in the subjective measurements. A pink noise signal was used for one-third octave bands: 125, 250, 500, 1000, 2000, 4000, and 8000 Hz. The attenuation value was defined as the difference (in dB) between the hearing threshold of the test signal with a hearing protector and the hearing threshold determined without a hearing protector. Results: The results of the objective method proved that in addition to the significant impact of frequency on the attenuation values, the type of filter used in custom moulded earplugs also had a significant effect. In addition, the results of the objective method showed that in the whole frequency range the highest attenuation values are shown by the full earplugs, achieving slightly above 45 dB for frequency of 8 kHz. The attenuation values obtained from subjective measurements also confirmed that both the frequency and type of filter significantly affect the attenuation values of the tested hearing protectors. Conclusions: The results of this study did not confirm the hypothesis that the measurement method had no significant effect on the attenuation characteristics of self-designed custom moulded earplugs with different types of acoustic filters. The largest differences in attenuation values between the type of measurement methods occur for the low frequency band (250 Hz) and for higher frequencies (4000 Hz mainly). The change of the internal diameter of the F1 filter from 1.25 mm to 0.85 mm (F2 filter) did not significantly affect the attenuation characteristics.","PeriodicalId":8149,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Acoustics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Acoustics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24425/aoa.2022.141650","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hearing loss caused by excessive exposure to noise is one of the most common health risks for employees. One solution for noise reduction is the use of hearing protectors, which is a very effective method for protecting hearing from the workplace noise. In order to obtain better attenuation efficiency, custom moulded earplugs can be equipped with a suitable acoustic filter. The effectiveness of the hearing protectors’ attenuation is based on real measurement of hearing thresholds for normal hearing people with and without hearing protectors. However, this is a time consuming process, and the obtained values are characterised by quite large inter-individual variability. The optimal solution is to measure the attenuation characteristics based on the objective method (without the presence of the subject), the results of which will be in accordance with the results of subjective tests. Therefore, the main purpose of the research in this work was to measure the attenuation characteristics of the self-designed custom moulded earplugs with and without acoustic filters through the use of subjective and objective methods, and to compare the results in terms of the research methods. Methods: Measurements of the acoustic attenuation obtained by custom moulded earplugs with designed F1, F2, and F3 acoustic filters (internal diameters d F1 = 1 . 25 mm, d F2 = 0 . 85 mm, and d F3 = 0 . 45 mm), as well as full insert earplugs (without any acoustic filters) were carried out using two methods: objective and subjective. The objective measurements were carried out in an anechoic chamber. The artificial head (High-frequency Head and Torso Simulator Brüel & Kjær Type 5128) was located at a distance of 3 m, directly opposite the loudspeaker. The test signal in the measurements was pink noise – in the frequency range up to 12.5 kHz and the level 85, 90, and 95 dB. The hearing protectors with and without acoustic filters were mounted in the Head and Torso Simulator which was connected with Pulse System Brüel & Kjær. Five normal hearing subjects participated in the subjective measurements. A pink noise signal was used for one-third octave bands: 125, 250, 500, 1000, 2000, 4000, and 8000 Hz. The attenuation value was defined as the difference (in dB) between the hearing threshold of the test signal with a hearing protector and the hearing threshold determined without a hearing protector. Results: The results of the objective method proved that in addition to the significant impact of frequency on the attenuation values, the type of filter used in custom moulded earplugs also had a significant effect. In addition, the results of the objective method showed that in the whole frequency range the highest attenuation values are shown by the full earplugs, achieving slightly above 45 dB for frequency of 8 kHz. The attenuation values obtained from subjective measurements also confirmed that both the frequency and type of filter significantly affect the attenuation values of the tested hearing protectors. Conclusions: The results of this study did not confirm the hypothesis that the measurement method had no significant effect on the attenuation characteristics of self-designed custom moulded earplugs with different types of acoustic filters. The largest differences in attenuation values between the type of measurement methods occur for the low frequency band (250 Hz) and for higher frequencies (4000 Hz mainly). The change of the internal diameter of the F1 filter from 1.25 mm to 0.85 mm (F2 filter) did not significantly affect the attenuation characteristics.
不同滤声器定制耳塞消声效率的客观与主观评价——初步研究
背景:过度暴露在噪音中导致的听力损失是员工最常见的健康风险之一。降噪的一个解决方案是使用听力保护器,这是一种非常有效的保护听力免受工作场所噪音影响的方法。为了获得更好的衰减效率,定制模制耳塞可以配备合适的声学滤波器。听力保护器衰减的有效性是基于对有听力保护器和无听力保护器的正常听力人群的听力阈值的真实测量。然而,这是一个耗时的过程,所获得的值具有相当大的个体间变异性。最佳解决方案是基于客观方法(在不存在受试者的情况下)测量衰减特性,其结果将与主观测试的结果一致。因此,本研究的主要目的是通过主观和客观的方法,测量自行设计的带有和不带有声学滤波器的定制模制耳塞的衰减特性,并根据研究方法对结果进行比较。方法:使用两种方法测量定制模制耳塞获得的声学衰减,该耳塞具有设计的F1、F2和F3声学滤波器(内径d F1=1.25 mm、d F2=0.85 mm和d F3=0.45 mm),以及全插入式耳塞(没有任何声学滤波器):客观和主观。客观测量是在一个消声室中进行的。人工头(高频头和Torso模拟器Brüel&Kjær 5128型)位于扬声器正对面3米处。测量中的测试信号为粉红色噪声,频率范围高达12.5 kHz,电平为85、90和95 dB。带和不带声学滤波器的听力保护器安装在头部和躯干模拟器中,该模拟器与Brüel&Kjær脉冲系统相连。五名听力正常的受试者参与了主观测量。粉红噪声信号用于三分之一倍频程频带:125250500100020004000和8000Hz。衰减值被定义为带听力保护器的测试信号的听力阈值与不带听力保护装置的情况下确定的听力阈值之间的差异(以dB为单位)。结果:客观方法的结果证明,除了频率对衰减值的显著影响外,定制模制耳塞中使用的滤波器类型也有显著影响。此外,目标方法的结果表明,在整个频率范围内,全耳塞的衰减值最高,在8kHz的频率下达到略高于45dB。从主观测量中获得的衰减值也证实,滤波器的频率和类型都会显著影响测试听力保护器的衰减值。结论:本研究的结果并没有证实测量方法对自行设计的带有不同类型声学滤波器的定制模制耳塞的衰减特性没有显著影响的假设。测量方法类型之间的衰减值差异最大的是低频带(250 Hz)和高频带(主要是4000 Hz)。F1滤波器内径从1.25 mm变为0.85 mm(F2滤波器)并没有显著影响衰减特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Acoustics
Archives of Acoustics 物理-声学
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Acoustics, the peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishes original research papers from all areas of acoustics like: acoustical measurements and instrumentation, acoustics of musics, acousto-optics, architectural, building and environmental acoustics, bioacoustics, electroacoustics, linear and nonlinear acoustics, noise and vibration, physical and chemical effects of sound, physiological acoustics, psychoacoustics, quantum acoustics, speech processing and communication systems, speech production and perception, transducers, ultrasonics, underwater acoustics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信