A Coordinated Population Health Approach to Diabetes Education in Primary Care

IF 3.9 Q1 Health Professions
Margaret F. Zupa, V. Arena, Patricia A. Johnson, Margaret Thearle, L. Siminerio
{"title":"A Coordinated Population Health Approach to Diabetes Education in Primary Care","authors":"Margaret F. Zupa, V. Arena, Patricia A. Johnson, Margaret Thearle, L. Siminerio","doi":"10.1177/0145721719879427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The purpose of this feasibility study was to determine the effectiveness of an insurer-based diabetes educator (DE)–driven intervention that relies on systematic restructuring of primary care (PC) linking DE services through population health, practice redesign, and coordinated care for patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) identified as high risk. Methods Two DEs were introduced as members of PC teams and worked with practice-based care managers (PBCMs) to identify and refer DM patients considered at high risk, A1C >9%, DM-related emergency room visit or hospitalization, or reported barriers to care. Elements shown to ensure quality, including population management, diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES), and coordinated patient-centered team-based PC, were central to intervention. A1C, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and body mass index (BMI) were collected at baseline and outcomes were followed at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after intervention. Results For patients who received intervention, A1C decreased on average 1.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8-1.5) from 9.6% (81 mmol/mol) to 8.4% (68 mmol/mol) over 6 months and by 1.1% (95% CI, 0.7-1.5) from 9.2% (77 mmol/mol) to 8.1% (65 mmol/mol) over 12 months, indicating durable improvement in glycemic control. There was no significant change in BMI, and LDL improvement observed at 9 months was lost by 12-month follow-up. Conclusion Findings support the feasibility of a DE-driven intervention for patients with DM at high risk through a coordinated PC approach that improves glycemic control. The feasibility and clinical outcome of this model warrant consideration of a fresh role for DEs in the complex environment of value-based care.","PeriodicalId":50584,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Educator","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0145721719879427","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Educator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0145721719879427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this feasibility study was to determine the effectiveness of an insurer-based diabetes educator (DE)–driven intervention that relies on systematic restructuring of primary care (PC) linking DE services through population health, practice redesign, and coordinated care for patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) identified as high risk. Methods Two DEs were introduced as members of PC teams and worked with practice-based care managers (PBCMs) to identify and refer DM patients considered at high risk, A1C >9%, DM-related emergency room visit or hospitalization, or reported barriers to care. Elements shown to ensure quality, including population management, diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES), and coordinated patient-centered team-based PC, were central to intervention. A1C, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and body mass index (BMI) were collected at baseline and outcomes were followed at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after intervention. Results For patients who received intervention, A1C decreased on average 1.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8-1.5) from 9.6% (81 mmol/mol) to 8.4% (68 mmol/mol) over 6 months and by 1.1% (95% CI, 0.7-1.5) from 9.2% (77 mmol/mol) to 8.1% (65 mmol/mol) over 12 months, indicating durable improvement in glycemic control. There was no significant change in BMI, and LDL improvement observed at 9 months was lost by 12-month follow-up. Conclusion Findings support the feasibility of a DE-driven intervention for patients with DM at high risk through a coordinated PC approach that improves glycemic control. The feasibility and clinical outcome of this model warrant consideration of a fresh role for DEs in the complex environment of value-based care.
在初级保健中协调糖尿病教育的人口健康方法
本可行性研究的目的是确定以保险公司为基础的糖尿病教育者(DE)驱动的干预措施的有效性,该干预措施依赖于通过人口健康、实践重新设计和对确定为高风险的糖尿病(DM)患者的协调护理来连接DE服务的初级保健(PC)的系统重组。方法引入两名de作为PC团队的成员,并与基于实践的护理经理(pbcm)合作,识别和转诊被认为是高风险的糖尿病患者,糖化血红蛋白(A1C)达到9%,与糖尿病相关的急诊室就诊或住院,或报告的护理障碍。确保质量的要素,包括人口管理、糖尿病自我管理教育和支持(DSMES),以及协调以患者为中心的团队PC,是干预的核心。在基线时收集A1C、低密度脂蛋白(LDL)和体重指数(BMI),并在干预后3、6、9和12个月随访结果。结果接受干预的患者,糖化血红蛋白在6个月内从9.6% (81 mmol/mol)降至8.4% (68 mmol/mol),平均下降1.2%(95%置信区间[CI], 0.8-1.5);在12个月内从9.2% (77 mmol/mol)降至8.1% (65 mmol/mol),平均下降1.1% (95% CI, 0.7-1.5),表明血糖控制持续改善。BMI无显著变化,9个月时观察到的低密度脂蛋白改善在12个月的随访中消失。结论:研究结果支持通过协调的PC方法对糖尿病高危患者进行de驱动干预的可行性,该方法可改善血糖控制。该模型的可行性和临床结果保证了在基于价值的护理的复杂环境中为DEs考虑一个新的角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes Educator
Diabetes Educator 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Diabetes Educator (TDE) is the official journal of the American Association of Di­abetes Educators (AADE). It is a peer-reviewed journal intended to serve as a reference source for the science and art of diabetes management. TDE publishes original articles that relate to aspects of patient care and education, clinical practice and/or research, and the multidisciplinary pro­fession of diabetes education as represented by nurses, dietitians, physicians, pharmacists, mental health professionals, podiatrists, and exercise physiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信