A governance perspective on East Central Europe’s population predicament: Young exit, grey voice and lopsided loyalty

Q3 Social Sciences
P. Vanhuysse
{"title":"A governance perspective on East Central Europe’s population predicament: Young exit, grey voice and lopsided loyalty","authors":"P. Vanhuysse","doi":"10.1553/p-5gkf-6kn3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Much of East Central Europe today faces the double challenge of having a population that is both ageing fast and shrinking steadily. Elderly-oriented political dynamics and myopic governance are part of this predicament, and are also among the reasons why future prospects are not rosy. Having started the post-communist transition with younger populations, successive governments in this region have comprehensively squandered a decades-long window of opportunity to adapt their policies to the predicted ageing ahead (Vanhuysse and Perek-Bialas, 2021). Especially in Hungary, Poland, Czechia, the Slovak Republic, Romania and Bulgaria, this failure is reflected in low active ageing and child well-being index rankings, low levels of social investment and mediocre educational outcomes, and family policies that reinforce traditional motherhood roles or barely support parents at all. Poland, Romania, Croatia, Hungary and, especially, the Baltic states also experienced large-scale emigration (‘young exit’). Slovenia and the Visegrad Four, but not the Baltics, became premature pensioners‘ democracies characterised by unusually high levels of pro-elderly policy bias (‘lopsided loyalty’). While the salience of family policies increased around the time the demographic window closed, this shift was driven by pro-natalist, neo-familialist and gender-regressive political ideologies, rather than by a concerted effort to boost human capabilities or reward social reproduction. But by then, elderly voter power (‘grey voice’) in East Central Europe was among the highest in the world. Politics strongly constrains the likelihood of appropriate human capital-boosting policy responses to the region’s population predicament. Alarm bells thus ring for a generational contract under pressure and for longer-term societal resilience.","PeriodicalId":34968,"journal":{"name":"Vienna Yearbook of Population Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vienna Yearbook of Population Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1553/p-5gkf-6kn3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Much of East Central Europe today faces the double challenge of having a population that is both ageing fast and shrinking steadily. Elderly-oriented political dynamics and myopic governance are part of this predicament, and are also among the reasons why future prospects are not rosy. Having started the post-communist transition with younger populations, successive governments in this region have comprehensively squandered a decades-long window of opportunity to adapt their policies to the predicted ageing ahead (Vanhuysse and Perek-Bialas, 2021). Especially in Hungary, Poland, Czechia, the Slovak Republic, Romania and Bulgaria, this failure is reflected in low active ageing and child well-being index rankings, low levels of social investment and mediocre educational outcomes, and family policies that reinforce traditional motherhood roles or barely support parents at all. Poland, Romania, Croatia, Hungary and, especially, the Baltic states also experienced large-scale emigration (‘young exit’). Slovenia and the Visegrad Four, but not the Baltics, became premature pensioners‘ democracies characterised by unusually high levels of pro-elderly policy bias (‘lopsided loyalty’). While the salience of family policies increased around the time the demographic window closed, this shift was driven by pro-natalist, neo-familialist and gender-regressive political ideologies, rather than by a concerted effort to boost human capabilities or reward social reproduction. But by then, elderly voter power (‘grey voice’) in East Central Europe was among the highest in the world. Politics strongly constrains the likelihood of appropriate human capital-boosting policy responses to the region’s population predicament. Alarm bells thus ring for a generational contract under pressure and for longer-term societal resilience.
中东欧人口困境的治理视角:年轻人退出、灰色声音和不平衡的忠诚
如今,中东欧大部分地区面临着人口快速老龄化和稳步萎缩的双重挑战。面向老年人的政治动态和短视的治理是这种困境的一部分,也是未来前景不乐观的原因之一。该地区的历届政府都以年轻人口开始了后共产主义时期的过渡,全面浪费了长达数十年的机会窗口,使其政策适应预测的未来老龄化(Vanhuysse和Perek Bialas,2021)。尤其是在匈牙利、波兰、捷克、斯洛伐克共和国、罗马尼亚和保加利亚,这种失败反映在积极老龄化和儿童福祉指数排名低、社会投资水平低、教育成果平平,以及强化传统母亲角色或几乎不支持父母的家庭政策上。波兰、罗马尼亚、克罗地亚、匈牙利,尤其是波罗的海国家也经历了大规模移民(“年轻人出境”)。斯洛文尼亚和维谢格拉德四国(而不是波罗的海四国)过早成为养老金领取者的民主国家,其特点是亲老年政策偏见(“盲目忠诚”)异常严重。虽然在人口窗口关闭前后,家庭政策的重要性有所增加,但这种转变是由赞成生育主义、新家庭主义和性别倒退的政治意识形态推动的,而不是由提高人类能力或奖励社会再生产的共同努力推动的。但到那时,中东欧的老年选民权力(“灰色声音”)是世界上最高的。政治极大地限制了对该地区人口困境采取适当的人力资本促进政策回应的可能性。因此,压力下的代际契约和长期社会韧性敲响了警钟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vienna Yearbook of Population Research
Vienna Yearbook of Population Research Social Sciences-Demography
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: In Europe there is currently an increasing public awareness of the importance that demographic trends have in reshaping our societies. Concerns about possible negative consequences of population aging seem to be the major force behind this new interest in demographic research. Demographers have been pointing out the fundamental change in the age composition of European populations and its potentially serious implications for social security schemes for more than two decades but it is only now that the expected retirement of the baby boom generation has come close enough in time to appear on the radar screen of social security planners and political decision makers to be considered a real challenge and not just an academic exercise.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信