THE ROLE OF DIVERGENT THINKING IN INTERPERSONAL TRUST DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: CREATIVE ASPECTS

Q1 Social Sciences
Massimiliano Palmiero, Rocco Palumbo, Irene Ceccato, Pasquale La Malva, Adolfo Di Crosta, G. Fusi, M. Crepaldi, M. Rusconi, A. Di Domenico
{"title":"THE ROLE OF DIVERGENT THINKING IN INTERPERSONAL TRUST DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: CREATIVE ASPECTS","authors":"Massimiliano Palmiero, Rocco Palumbo, Irene Ceccato, Pasquale La Malva, Adolfo Di Crosta, G. Fusi, M. Crepaldi, M. Rusconi, A. Di Domenico","doi":"10.3846/cs.2023.15946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Interpersonal trust relies on positive expectations about other people. Social psychology distinguishes ingroup (individuals share social identity, e.g., family) from outgroup trust (individuals do not share social identity, e.g., strangers). We conducted an experimental study to test if divergent thinking, which relies on an inclusive processing mode, differently affected ingroup and outgroup trust during the lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic. A sample of 114 healthy college students, with no prior or current COVID-19 infection (mean age = 23.66, sd = 2.53, 89% women) was recruited. Interpersonal trust was measured by three ingroup and three outgroup trust items. Divergent thinking was measured by the alternative uses task, which asked to find alternative uses for common objects. Divergent thinking was scored by two independent raters in terms of fluency and quality of ideas. To control for generalized anxiety and mood states, the generalized anxiety disorder scale and the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule were administered, respectively. To control for the inclusiveness of divergent thinking performance, the alternative uses task was administered using three types of instructions. Thus, the sample was divided in three groups of 38 participants according to the divergent thinking task instructions: “be-fluent: find as many different uses for the objects”, “be-creative: find creative uses for the objects”, and “be fluent and creative: find as many different and creative uses of the objects”. The hierarchical regression analyses showed that the quality, but not the quantity of divergent thinking positively predicted only outgroup trust, whereas the mood positively predicted ingroup trust. Divergent thinking task instructions did not affect interpersonal trust. Thus, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, the quality of divergent thinking supports only outgroup trust based on the inclusive processing mode, meaning that people showing high ability to produce uncommon, remote and clever ideas are more inclusive and by consequence more prone to trust strangers. Limitations and implications are discussed.","PeriodicalId":38085,"journal":{"name":"Creativity Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Creativity Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2023.15946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interpersonal trust relies on positive expectations about other people. Social psychology distinguishes ingroup (individuals share social identity, e.g., family) from outgroup trust (individuals do not share social identity, e.g., strangers). We conducted an experimental study to test if divergent thinking, which relies on an inclusive processing mode, differently affected ingroup and outgroup trust during the lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic. A sample of 114 healthy college students, with no prior or current COVID-19 infection (mean age = 23.66, sd = 2.53, 89% women) was recruited. Interpersonal trust was measured by three ingroup and three outgroup trust items. Divergent thinking was measured by the alternative uses task, which asked to find alternative uses for common objects. Divergent thinking was scored by two independent raters in terms of fluency and quality of ideas. To control for generalized anxiety and mood states, the generalized anxiety disorder scale and the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule were administered, respectively. To control for the inclusiveness of divergent thinking performance, the alternative uses task was administered using three types of instructions. Thus, the sample was divided in three groups of 38 participants according to the divergent thinking task instructions: “be-fluent: find as many different uses for the objects”, “be-creative: find creative uses for the objects”, and “be fluent and creative: find as many different and creative uses of the objects”. The hierarchical regression analyses showed that the quality, but not the quantity of divergent thinking positively predicted only outgroup trust, whereas the mood positively predicted ingroup trust. Divergent thinking task instructions did not affect interpersonal trust. Thus, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, the quality of divergent thinking supports only outgroup trust based on the inclusive processing mode, meaning that people showing high ability to produce uncommon, remote and clever ideas are more inclusive and by consequence more prone to trust strangers. Limitations and implications are discussed.
COVID-19大流行期间,发散性思维在人际信任中的作用:创造性方面
人际信任依赖于对他人的积极期望。社会心理学将内群体信任(个体共享社会身份,如家庭)与外群体信任(个体不共享社会身份,如陌生人)区分开来。我们进行了一项实验研究,以检验在新冠肺炎疫情封锁期间,依赖于包容性处理模式的发散性思维是否对群体内和群体外信任产生了不同的影响。114名健康大学生(平均年龄23.66岁,sd = 2.53, 89%为女性),既往或当前无COVID-19感染。人际信任由三个群体内信任和三个群体外信任项目来衡量。发散性思维是通过替代用途任务来衡量的,该任务要求找到常见物品的替代用途。发散性思维由两名独立评分员根据想法的流畅性和质量进行评分。为了控制广泛性焦虑和情绪状态,分别使用广泛性焦虑障碍量表和积极和消极情绪量表。为了控制发散性思维表现的包容性,选择使用任务使用三种类型的指令进行管理。因此,根据发散思维任务说明,样本被分为三组,每组38人:“要流利:为物体找到尽可能多的不同用途”,“要有创造性:为物体找到创造性的用途”,“要流利和有创造性:为物体找到尽可能多的不同和创造性的用途”。层次回归分析显示,发散思维的质量对外群体信任有正向预测作用,而情绪对内群体信任有正向预测作用。发散性思维任务指示对人际信任没有影响。因此,在新冠肺炎大流行背景下,发散性思维的品质只支持基于包容性加工模式的外群体信任,这意味着具有高能力产生不寻常、遥远和聪明想法的人更具包容性,因此更容易信任陌生人。讨论了局限性和影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Creativity Studies
Creativity Studies Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Creativity Studies accepts original research articles with a focus on communication within the creative society. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars from diverse disciplines such as philosophy, sociology, history, political, communication and information sciences. Creativity Studies also publishes survey papers and descriptions of academic events in this area. The journal issues will be organized around different issues on creativity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信