Review of methodological workflow, interpretation and limitations of nomogram application in cancer study

Q1 Health Professions
Wingyi Lee , Sai-Kit Lam , Yuanpeng Zhang , Ruijie Yang , Jing Cai
{"title":"Review of methodological workflow, interpretation and limitations of nomogram application in cancer study","authors":"Wingyi Lee ,&nbsp;Sai-Kit Lam ,&nbsp;Yuanpeng Zhang ,&nbsp;Ruijie Yang ,&nbsp;Jing Cai","doi":"10.1016/j.radmp.2022.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Nomograms have been increasingly adopted in cancer studies for predicting a variety of clinical outcomes. Compared to conventional prediction approaches, nomograms present an excellent graphical easy-to-interpret visualization and by combining patients’ characteristics and statistical models constructed based on diagnostic tests, higher accuracy could be achieved, facilitating the clinical decision-making process. However, with the increasing number of nomograms being proposed, misinterpretations may often occur, introducing a large degree of uncertainties in clinical situations. This review article aims to provide a methodological summary for nomogram applications, construction, and interpretation, with a demonstrative example of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patient data in the field of radiation medicine. Common misunderstandings and limitations are also discussed to underscore the applicability of nomograms in different scenarios. The overarching goal of this review article is to provide general audiences with fundamental and essential knowledge toward comprehending and implementing nomograms in cancer studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34051,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Medicine and Protection","volume":"3 4","pages":"Pages 200-207"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666555722000600/pdfft?md5=ccad1f9fa2d5dd459dd8afd96e2fc58f&pid=1-s2.0-S2666555722000600-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Medicine and Protection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666555722000600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Nomograms have been increasingly adopted in cancer studies for predicting a variety of clinical outcomes. Compared to conventional prediction approaches, nomograms present an excellent graphical easy-to-interpret visualization and by combining patients’ characteristics and statistical models constructed based on diagnostic tests, higher accuracy could be achieved, facilitating the clinical decision-making process. However, with the increasing number of nomograms being proposed, misinterpretations may often occur, introducing a large degree of uncertainties in clinical situations. This review article aims to provide a methodological summary for nomogram applications, construction, and interpretation, with a demonstrative example of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patient data in the field of radiation medicine. Common misunderstandings and limitations are also discussed to underscore the applicability of nomograms in different scenarios. The overarching goal of this review article is to provide general audiences with fundamental and essential knowledge toward comprehending and implementing nomograms in cancer studies.

综述了nomogram在癌症研究中的应用的方法学流程、解释和局限性
在癌症研究中越来越多地采用图来预测各种临床结果。与传统的预测方法相比,nomograph具有良好的图形化,易于解释的可视化效果,并且将患者特征与基于诊断试验构建的统计模型相结合,可以达到更高的准确性,便于临床决策。然而,随着越来越多的线图被提出,误解可能经常发生,在临床情况下引入了很大程度的不确定性。本文以鼻咽癌患者资料为例,对放射医学中nomogram应用、构建和解释的方法学进行综述。还讨论了常见的误解和限制,以强调图在不同情况下的适用性。这篇综述文章的总体目标是为普通读者提供基本的和必要的知识,以便在癌症研究中理解和实施范式图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiation Medicine and Protection
Radiation Medicine and Protection Health Professions-Emergency Medical Services
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信