Comparison of awake electroencephalography, electroencephalography after sleep deprivation, and melatonin-induced sleep electroencephalography sensitivity in the diagnosis of epilepsy in adults

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
B. Demirtaş, I. Uludag, U. Şener, Y. Zorlu
{"title":"Comparison of awake electroencephalography, electroencephalography after sleep deprivation, and melatonin-induced sleep electroencephalography sensitivity in the diagnosis of epilepsy in adults","authors":"B. Demirtaş, I. Uludag, U. Şener, Y. Zorlu","doi":"10.4103/nsn.nsn_101_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare routine awake electroencephalography (r-EEG), melatonin-induced sleep EEG (m-EEG) and EEG (d-EEG) after sleep deprivation studies in terms of epileptiform anomalies (EA), and to compare d-EEG and m-EEG studies in terms of sleep induction in patients requiring differential diagnosis of epileptic seizure/nonepileptic seizure. Methods: The study included 45 patients aged 18–45 years who had at least one seizure suspected to be epileptic but could not be diagnosed with epilepsy with clinical and laboratory findings. Each patient underwent r-EEG on the 1st day, d-EEG on the 2nd day after 24 h of sleeplessness, and m-EEG on the 3rd day after the administration of 6 mg melatonin following 7 h night sleep. Three separate EEG tracings of the patients were compared for EA. The d-EEG and m-EEG methods were examined for their ability to achieve sleep, total sleep time (ST), and sleep latency (SL). Results: When the detection rate of EA in d-EEG and m-EEG was compared with that of r-EEG, it was found to be significantly higher (P < 0.001) (73.3% with d-EEG, 75.6% with m-EEG, and 35.6% with r-EEG). Sleep was achieved at a rate of 100% after receiving melatonin and at a rate of 97.8% with sleep deprivation. There was no significant difference between d-EEG and m-EEG in terms of mean ST and SL (ST = 58.6 ± 12.6 min and 59.7 ± 8.3 min, respectively; SL = 287.6 ± 484.3 s and 152.2 ± 178.7 s after the start of the EEG, respectively). Conclusions: Sleep EEG is superior to awake EEG in terms of detecting EA. In an EEG study, where melatonin was used to induce sleep, the sleep rate and SL were similar to those of d-EEG, and melatonin did not have an EA increasing or suppressing effect on EEG. Given the ease of application and low side effect profile, it is thought that m-EEG may be an applicable method in the diagnosis of epilepsy.","PeriodicalId":48555,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology","volume":"39 1","pages":"195 - 199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/nsn.nsn_101_22","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare routine awake electroencephalography (r-EEG), melatonin-induced sleep EEG (m-EEG) and EEG (d-EEG) after sleep deprivation studies in terms of epileptiform anomalies (EA), and to compare d-EEG and m-EEG studies in terms of sleep induction in patients requiring differential diagnosis of epileptic seizure/nonepileptic seizure. Methods: The study included 45 patients aged 18–45 years who had at least one seizure suspected to be epileptic but could not be diagnosed with epilepsy with clinical and laboratory findings. Each patient underwent r-EEG on the 1st day, d-EEG on the 2nd day after 24 h of sleeplessness, and m-EEG on the 3rd day after the administration of 6 mg melatonin following 7 h night sleep. Three separate EEG tracings of the patients were compared for EA. The d-EEG and m-EEG methods were examined for their ability to achieve sleep, total sleep time (ST), and sleep latency (SL). Results: When the detection rate of EA in d-EEG and m-EEG was compared with that of r-EEG, it was found to be significantly higher (P < 0.001) (73.3% with d-EEG, 75.6% with m-EEG, and 35.6% with r-EEG). Sleep was achieved at a rate of 100% after receiving melatonin and at a rate of 97.8% with sleep deprivation. There was no significant difference between d-EEG and m-EEG in terms of mean ST and SL (ST = 58.6 ± 12.6 min and 59.7 ± 8.3 min, respectively; SL = 287.6 ± 484.3 s and 152.2 ± 178.7 s after the start of the EEG, respectively). Conclusions: Sleep EEG is superior to awake EEG in terms of detecting EA. In an EEG study, where melatonin was used to induce sleep, the sleep rate and SL were similar to those of d-EEG, and melatonin did not have an EA increasing or suppressing effect on EEG. Given the ease of application and low side effect profile, it is thought that m-EEG may be an applicable method in the diagnosis of epilepsy.
清醒脑电图、睡眠剥夺后脑电图及褪黑素诱发的睡眠脑电图敏感性在成人癫痫诊断中的比较
引言:本研究的目的是比较癫痫样异常(EA)睡眠剥夺研究后的常规清醒脑电图(r-EEG)、褪黑素诱导的睡眠脑电图(m-EEG)和脑电图(d-EEG),并比较需要鉴别诊断癫痫发作/非癫痫发作的患者在睡眠诱导方面的d-EEG和m-EEG研究。方法:该研究包括45名年龄在18-45岁之间的患者,他们至少有一次癫痫发作被怀疑是癫痫,但根据临床和实验室结果无法诊断为癫痫。每位患者在失眠24小时后的第1天接受r-EEG,第2天接受d-EEG,在夜间睡眠7小时后给予6mg褪黑素后的第3天接受m-EEG。比较了三个独立的患者脑电图描记的EA。检查d-EEG和m-EEG方法实现睡眠的能力、总睡眠时间(ST)和睡眠潜伏期(SL)。结果:d-EEG和m-EEG的EA检出率与r-EEG相比,有显著性差异(P<0.001)(d-EEG为73.3%,m-EEG为75.6%,r-EEG为35.6%)。接受褪黑激素治疗后,睡眠率为100%,睡眠不足时睡眠率为97.8%。在平均ST和SL方面,d-EEG和m-EEG之间没有显著差异(ST=58.6±12.6分钟和59.7±8.3分钟;SL=287.6±484.3秒和152.2±178.7秒)。结论:睡眠脑电图在检测电针方面优于清醒脑电图。在一项使用褪黑素诱导睡眠的脑电图研究中,睡眠率和SL与d-EEG相似,褪黑素对脑电图没有增加或抑制EA的作用。鉴于m-EEG的易用性和低副作用,人们认为m-EEG可能是诊断癫痫的一种适用方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology is the double blind peer-reviewed, open access, international publication organ of Turkish Society of Clinical Neurophysiology EEG-EMG. The journal is a quarterly publication, published in March, June, September and December and the publication language of the journal is English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信