Unveiling the hidden economic toll of biological invasions in the European Union

IF 5.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 Environmental Science
Morgane Henry, Brian Leung, Ross N. Cuthbert, Thomas W. Bodey, Danish A. Ahmed, Elena Angulo, Paride Balzani, Elizabeta Briski, Franck Courchamp, Philip E. Hulme, Antonín Kouba, Melina Kourantidou, Chunlong Liu, Rafael L. Macêdo, Francisco J. Oficialdegui, David Renault, Ismael Soto, Ali Serhan Tarkan, Anna J. Turbelin, Corey J. A. Bradshaw, Phillip J. Haubrock
{"title":"Unveiling the hidden economic toll of biological invasions in the European Union","authors":"Morgane Henry,&nbsp;Brian Leung,&nbsp;Ross N. Cuthbert,&nbsp;Thomas W. Bodey,&nbsp;Danish A. Ahmed,&nbsp;Elena Angulo,&nbsp;Paride Balzani,&nbsp;Elizabeta Briski,&nbsp;Franck Courchamp,&nbsp;Philip E. Hulme,&nbsp;Antonín Kouba,&nbsp;Melina Kourantidou,&nbsp;Chunlong Liu,&nbsp;Rafael L. Macêdo,&nbsp;Francisco J. Oficialdegui,&nbsp;David Renault,&nbsp;Ismael Soto,&nbsp;Ali Serhan Tarkan,&nbsp;Anna J. Turbelin,&nbsp;Corey J. A. Bradshaw,&nbsp;Phillip J. Haubrock","doi":"10.1186/s12302-023-00750-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Biological invasions threaten the functioning of ecosystems, biodiversity, and human well-being by degrading ecosystem services and eliciting massive economic costs. The European Union has historically been a hub for cultural development and global trade, and thus, has extensive opportunities for the introduction and spread of alien species. While reported costs of biological invasions to some member states have been recently assessed, ongoing knowledge gaps in taxonomic and spatio-temporal data suggest that these costs were considerably underestimated.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>We used the latest available cost data in <i>InvaCost</i> (v4.1)—the most comprehensive database on the costs of biological invasions—to assess the magnitude of this underestimation within the European Union via projections of current and future invasion costs. We used macroeconomic scaling and temporal modelling approaches to project available cost information over gaps in taxa, space, and time, thereby producing a more complete estimate for the European Union economy. We identified that only 259 out of 13,331 (~ 1%) known invasive alien species have reported costs in the European Union. Using a conservative subset of highly reliable, observed, country-level cost entries from 49 species (totalling US$4.7 billion; 2017 value), combined with the establishment data of alien species within European Union member states, we projected unreported cost data for all member states.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our corrected estimate of observed costs was potentially 501% higher (US$28.0 billion) than currently recorded. Using future projections of current estimates, we also identified a substantial increase in costs and costly species (US$148.2 billion) by 2040. We urge that cost reporting be improved to clarify the economic impacts of greatest concern, concomitant with coordinated international action to prevent and mitigate the impacts of invasive alien species in the European Union and globally.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54293,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Sciences Europe","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://enveurope.springeropen.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s12302-023-00750-3","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Sciences Europe","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12302-023-00750-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background

Biological invasions threaten the functioning of ecosystems, biodiversity, and human well-being by degrading ecosystem services and eliciting massive economic costs. The European Union has historically been a hub for cultural development and global trade, and thus, has extensive opportunities for the introduction and spread of alien species. While reported costs of biological invasions to some member states have been recently assessed, ongoing knowledge gaps in taxonomic and spatio-temporal data suggest that these costs were considerably underestimated.

Results

We used the latest available cost data in InvaCost (v4.1)—the most comprehensive database on the costs of biological invasions—to assess the magnitude of this underestimation within the European Union via projections of current and future invasion costs. We used macroeconomic scaling and temporal modelling approaches to project available cost information over gaps in taxa, space, and time, thereby producing a more complete estimate for the European Union economy. We identified that only 259 out of 13,331 (~ 1%) known invasive alien species have reported costs in the European Union. Using a conservative subset of highly reliable, observed, country-level cost entries from 49 species (totalling US$4.7 billion; 2017 value), combined with the establishment data of alien species within European Union member states, we projected unreported cost data for all member states.

Conclusions

Our corrected estimate of observed costs was potentially 501% higher (US$28.0 billion) than currently recorded. Using future projections of current estimates, we also identified a substantial increase in costs and costly species (US$148.2 billion) by 2040. We urge that cost reporting be improved to clarify the economic impacts of greatest concern, concomitant with coordinated international action to prevent and mitigate the impacts of invasive alien species in the European Union and globally.

Abstract Image

揭露欧盟生物入侵的隐性经济代价
生物入侵通过降低生态系统服务并引发巨大的经济成本,威胁着生态系统的功能、生物多样性和人类福祉。欧洲联盟在历史上一直是文化发展和全球贸易的中心,因此为外来物种的引进和传播提供了广泛的机会。虽然最近对一些成员国报告的生物入侵成本进行了评估,但分类学和时空数据方面的知识差距表明,这些成本被大大低估了。结果:我们使用InvaCost (v4.1)中最新的可用成本数据——最全面的生物入侵成本数据库——通过对当前和未来入侵成本的预测,来评估欧盟内部这种低估的程度。我们使用宏观经济尺度和时间建模方法来项目在分类群、空间和时间上的差距的可用成本信息,从而对欧盟经济产生更完整的估计。我们发现,在13331种已知的外来入侵物种中,只有259种(约1%)在欧盟报告了成本。使用来自49个物种的高度可靠的、观察到的国家一级成本条目的保守子集(总计47亿美元;2017年的价值),结合欧盟成员国外来物种的建立数据,我们预测了所有成员国未报告的成本数据。我们对观察到的成本的修正估计可能比目前记录的高501%(280亿美元)。根据目前估计的未来预测,我们还确定到2040年成本和昂贵物种将大幅增加(1482亿美元)。我们敦促改进成本报告,以澄清最令人关切的经济影响,同时采取协调一致的国际行动,防止和减轻欧洲联盟和全球外来入侵物种的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Sciences Europe
Environmental Sciences Europe Environmental Science-Pollution
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
1.70%
发文量
110
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: ESEU is an international journal, focusing primarily on Europe, with a broad scope covering all aspects of environmental sciences, including the main topic regulation. ESEU will discuss the entanglement between environmental sciences and regulation because, in recent years, there have been misunderstandings and even disagreement between stakeholders in these two areas. ESEU will help to improve the comprehension of issues between environmental sciences and regulation. ESEU will be an outlet from the German-speaking (DACH) countries to Europe and an inlet from Europe to the DACH countries regarding environmental sciences and regulation. Moreover, ESEU will facilitate the exchange of ideas and interaction between Europe and the DACH countries regarding environmental regulatory issues. Although Europe is at the center of ESEU, the journal will not exclude the rest of the world, because regulatory issues pertaining to environmental sciences can be fully seen only from a global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信