Dapoxetine versus glans penis injection with hyaluronic acid gel in treatment of premature ejaculation.

IF 1.3 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Arab Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2023-08-11 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1080/2090598X.2023.2245598
Ibrahim M Ibrahim, Moustafa Mohamed, Mostafa Kamel, Lotfy Elbendary, Almaqtouf Mohamed, Mohamed S Elderey
{"title":"Dapoxetine versus glans penis injection with hyaluronic acid gel in treatment of premature ejaculation.","authors":"Ibrahim M Ibrahim, Moustafa Mohamed, Mostafa Kamel, Lotfy Elbendary, Almaqtouf Mohamed, Mohamed S Elderey","doi":"10.1080/2090598X.2023.2245598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>to compare the results of using Dapoxetine and HA (hyaluronic acid) gel injection by Five puncture technique in the treatment of premature ejaculation (PE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>100 sexually active heterosexuals circumcised males with lifelong PE were included in the study. Group A patients were treated with on-demand Dapoxetine, while group B was treated with HA gel glans penis injection using a five-puncture technique. Both groups were evaluated at 1<sup>st</sup>,3<sup>rd</sup> and 6<sup>th</sup> months post-treatment using IELT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences between both groups regarding patient demographic. Mean pretreatment IELT in groups A and B were 45.82 ± 7.44 and 46.18 ± 7.82 receptively. There was no significant difference between both groups. After treatment, both groups show significant ILET improvement during the 1<sup>st</sup>,3<sup>rd</sup>, and 6<sup>th</sup> months follow-up with a <i>P</i> value < 0.001. However, when comparing the improvement of ILET in group A (Dapoxetine) and group B (HA injection), there were high significance differences in favor of group B in the 1st,3rd, and 6th-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although both treatment modalities have improved IELT and premature ejaculation, but HA injection with five punctures technique was significantly better than oral Dapoxetine with self-limited side effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":8113,"journal":{"name":"Arab Journal of Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10929674/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arab Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2023.2245598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: to compare the results of using Dapoxetine and HA (hyaluronic acid) gel injection by Five puncture technique in the treatment of premature ejaculation (PE).

Methods: 100 sexually active heterosexuals circumcised males with lifelong PE were included in the study. Group A patients were treated with on-demand Dapoxetine, while group B was treated with HA gel glans penis injection using a five-puncture technique. Both groups were evaluated at 1st,3rd and 6th months post-treatment using IELT.

Results: There were no significant differences between both groups regarding patient demographic. Mean pretreatment IELT in groups A and B were 45.82 ± 7.44 and 46.18 ± 7.82 receptively. There was no significant difference between both groups. After treatment, both groups show significant ILET improvement during the 1st,3rd, and 6th months follow-up with a P value < 0.001. However, when comparing the improvement of ILET in group A (Dapoxetine) and group B (HA injection), there were high significance differences in favor of group B in the 1st,3rd, and 6th-month follow-up.

Conclusion: Although both treatment modalities have improved IELT and premature ejaculation, but HA injection with five punctures technique was significantly better than oral Dapoxetine with self-limited side effects.

达泊西汀与透明质酸凝胶阴茎头注射治疗早泄
目的:比较使用达泊西汀和五点穿刺法注射HA(透明质酸)凝胶治疗早泄(PE)的效果。方法:研究对象包括100名患有终身早泄的包皮环切异性恋男性。A组患者按需使用达泊西汀治疗,B组患者使用HA凝胶龟头阴茎注射,采用五点穿刺技术。两组患者均在治疗后的第 1、3 和 6 个月接受 IELT 评估:结果:两组患者在人口统计学方面无明显差异。A 组和 B 组治疗前 IELT 平均值分别为(45.82 ± 7.44)和(46.18 ± 7.82)。两组之间无明显差异。治疗后,两组患者在第 1、3 和 6 个月的随访中 ILET 均有明显改善,P 值均为 结论:虽然两种治疗方法都能改善IELT和早泄,但采用五次穿刺技术注射HA的效果明显优于口服达泊西汀,且副作用小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arab Journal of Urology
Arab Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The Arab Journal of Urology is a peer-reviewed journal that strives to provide a high standard of research and clinical material to the widest possible urological community worldwide. The journal encompasses all aspects of urology including: urological oncology, urological reconstructive surgery, urodynamics, female urology, pediatric urology, endourology, transplantation, erectile dysfunction, and urinary infections and inflammations. The journal provides reviews, original articles, editorials, surgical techniques, cases reports and correspondence. Urologists, oncologists, pathologists, radiologists and scientists are invited to submit their contributions to make the Arab Journal of Urology a viable international forum for the practical, timely and state-of-the-art clinical urology and basic urological research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信