Claiming the Lineage of Northeast Asian Civilization: The Discovery of Hongshan and the "Hongshan Turn" in Popular Korean Pseudohistory

IF 0.2 Q4 AREA STUDIES
A. Logie
{"title":"Claiming the Lineage of Northeast Asian Civilization: The Discovery of Hongshan and the \"Hongshan Turn\" in Popular Korean Pseudohistory","authors":"A. Logie","doi":"10.1353/seo.2020.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Hongshan is the name of a material culture straddling Inner Mongolia and the Liaoning provinces—the Liaoxi region—China, dating ca. 4500–3000 BCE. Known for enigmatically carved jades, Hongshan rose to popular prominence in the 1980s following the discovery of two significant ritual sites. Since then, some Chinese archaeologists have proposed Liaoxi as a source of either regional or greater Central Plain civilization. Heralding public knowledge in South Korea, meanwhile, Korean scholars active on the \"inner fringe\" of professional scholarship sought to contest Hongshan's \"Chinese\" identification, instead asserting it to be the origin of a civilization directly ancestral to the early polities of Korean history. Leading the popular discourse, they incorporated Hongshan into preexisting paradigms asserting continental origins of the Korean people and connected to aggrandizing schemes of Old Chosŏn (trad. 2333–108 BCE). From the latter half of the 2000s and against the context of national-level history disputes with China, a second generation of inner-fringe and unequivocal pseudohistorians has promoted Hongshan, establishing it as a seemingly core topic of \"Korean\" prehistory. Their emergence signals the \"Hongshan turn\" in Korean pseudohistory, a turn that has been further bolstered through Hongshan's incorporation into South Korean new religions. This article narrates the recent trajectory of the Hongshan discourse, critically analyzing its functions and framing.","PeriodicalId":41678,"journal":{"name":"Seoul Journal of Korean Studies","volume":"33 1","pages":"279 - 322"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/seo.2020.0012","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seoul Journal of Korean Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/seo.2020.0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Hongshan is the name of a material culture straddling Inner Mongolia and the Liaoning provinces—the Liaoxi region—China, dating ca. 4500–3000 BCE. Known for enigmatically carved jades, Hongshan rose to popular prominence in the 1980s following the discovery of two significant ritual sites. Since then, some Chinese archaeologists have proposed Liaoxi as a source of either regional or greater Central Plain civilization. Heralding public knowledge in South Korea, meanwhile, Korean scholars active on the "inner fringe" of professional scholarship sought to contest Hongshan's "Chinese" identification, instead asserting it to be the origin of a civilization directly ancestral to the early polities of Korean history. Leading the popular discourse, they incorporated Hongshan into preexisting paradigms asserting continental origins of the Korean people and connected to aggrandizing schemes of Old Chosŏn (trad. 2333–108 BCE). From the latter half of the 2000s and against the context of national-level history disputes with China, a second generation of inner-fringe and unequivocal pseudohistorians has promoted Hongshan, establishing it as a seemingly core topic of "Korean" prehistory. Their emergence signals the "Hongshan turn" in Korean pseudohistory, a turn that has been further bolstered through Hongshan's incorporation into South Korean new religions. This article narrates the recent trajectory of the Hongshan discourse, critically analyzing its functions and framing.
声称东北亚文明的世系:红山的发现与朝鲜伪历史的“红山转向”
摘要:红山是一个横跨内蒙古和辽宁省(中国辽西地区)的物质文化的名字,大约可以追溯到公元前4500年至3000年。红山以神秘的玉石雕刻而闻名,在20世纪80年代发现了两个重要的仪式遗址后,红山声名鹊起。从那时起,一些中国考古学家提出辽西是区域文明或大中原文明的源头。与此同时,活跃在专业学术“内部边缘”的韩国学者在韩国宣传公共知识,试图质疑洪山的“中国人”身份,而不是声称它是韩国历史早期政治直接祖先的文明的起源。在大众话语的主导下,他们将红山纳入了先前存在的范式中,主张朝鲜人的大陆起源,并与旧朝鲜人(trad.2333–108 BCE)的扩张计划联系在一起。从2000年代后半叶开始,在与中国国家级历史争端的背景下,第二代内部边缘和明确的伪历史学家对红山进行了宣传,将其确立为“朝鲜”史前史的一个看似核心的话题。它们的出现标志着韩国伪历史的“红山转向”,红山融入韩国新宗教进一步推动了这一转向。本文叙述了洪山话语的近代轨迹,并对其功能和框架进行了批判性分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Published twice a year under the auspices of the Kyujanggak Institute for Korean Studies at Seoul National University, the Seoul Journal of Korean Studies (SJKS) publishes original, state of the field research on Korea''s past and present. A peer-refereed journal, the Seoul Journal of Korean Studies is distributed to institutions and scholars both internationally and domestically. Work published by SJKS comprise in-depth research on established topics as well as new areas of concern, including transnational studies, that reconfigure scholarship devoted to Korean culture, history, literature, religion, and the arts. Unique features of this journal include the explicit aim of providing an English language forum to shape the field of Korean studies both in and outside of Korea. In addition to articles that represent state of the field research, the Seoul Journal of Korean Studies publishes an extensive "Book Notes" section that places particular emphasis on introducing the very best in Korean language scholarship to scholars around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信