Why London is Labour: A History of Metropolitan Politics, 1900–2020

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 Q4 AREA STUDIES
Pippa Catterall
{"title":"Why London is Labour: A History of Metropolitan Politics, 1900–2020","authors":"Pippa Catterall","doi":"10.1080/03058034.2022.2106401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"space for solidarity with other black immigrants. Abrahams’s relationship and subsequent rift with George Padmore, for instance, is traced through the response to his book Return to Goli, which emphasises the liberal humanism he formed in progressive and ‘tolerant’ 1950s London. In Matshikiza’s accounts of early 1960s London, Thorpe locates ‘a meaningful engagement with the interplay between London, South Africa and a wider global black imaginary’ (97). Thorpe draws on work by scholars including Leslie James; this book might also usefully be read in conversation with Marc Matera, Kennetta Hammond Perry, and Rob Waters to expand the historical frame of Black diasporic politics, geographies, and reading cultures in London. The chapters deal with the writing and experiences of male writers in the metropolis as their case studies, distinguished by intersections of race, class, and sexuality. Thorpe details the reasons of structure and genre as to why this is the case, including the masculinity of South African urban writing. The book also includes two ‘detours’, where Thorpe explores the work of Noni Jabavu, including her time as the first black woman editor of the New Strand magazine, and Lauretta Ngcobo, a ‘forger of alliances between Black British writers’ (184), including the edited collection Let It Be Told: Black Women Writers in Britain (1987). The detours are named as such because they represent ‘intriguing diversions into the cartography of the South African writer in London’ (12). This is perhaps most evident in Thorpe’s location of Ncgobo within wider London networks of black British activism and feminism, where she challenged the limits placed on black South African women writers and shaped the direction of intersectional, anti-racist politics. But Jabavu’s earlier experiences of gendered expectations and sexism and the negotiation of racism through her proximity to the upper middle class in Britain and the longevity of her time in London are also drawn out with finesse to offer a different story than the ‘well-worn tropes of masculine apartheid-era exile’ (91). These detours are fascinating but frustratingly brief, offering a tantalising glimpse into the alternative maps of South African London that might be further pursued. Nevertheless, there is much in Thorpe’s work for scholars of South African history and writing, London and urban histories, exile, modernity, and transnational movements.","PeriodicalId":43904,"journal":{"name":"London Journal","volume":"48 1","pages":"94 - 96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"London Journal","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03058034.2022.2106401","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

space for solidarity with other black immigrants. Abrahams’s relationship and subsequent rift with George Padmore, for instance, is traced through the response to his book Return to Goli, which emphasises the liberal humanism he formed in progressive and ‘tolerant’ 1950s London. In Matshikiza’s accounts of early 1960s London, Thorpe locates ‘a meaningful engagement with the interplay between London, South Africa and a wider global black imaginary’ (97). Thorpe draws on work by scholars including Leslie James; this book might also usefully be read in conversation with Marc Matera, Kennetta Hammond Perry, and Rob Waters to expand the historical frame of Black diasporic politics, geographies, and reading cultures in London. The chapters deal with the writing and experiences of male writers in the metropolis as their case studies, distinguished by intersections of race, class, and sexuality. Thorpe details the reasons of structure and genre as to why this is the case, including the masculinity of South African urban writing. The book also includes two ‘detours’, where Thorpe explores the work of Noni Jabavu, including her time as the first black woman editor of the New Strand magazine, and Lauretta Ngcobo, a ‘forger of alliances between Black British writers’ (184), including the edited collection Let It Be Told: Black Women Writers in Britain (1987). The detours are named as such because they represent ‘intriguing diversions into the cartography of the South African writer in London’ (12). This is perhaps most evident in Thorpe’s location of Ncgobo within wider London networks of black British activism and feminism, where she challenged the limits placed on black South African women writers and shaped the direction of intersectional, anti-racist politics. But Jabavu’s earlier experiences of gendered expectations and sexism and the negotiation of racism through her proximity to the upper middle class in Britain and the longevity of her time in London are also drawn out with finesse to offer a different story than the ‘well-worn tropes of masculine apartheid-era exile’ (91). These detours are fascinating but frustratingly brief, offering a tantalising glimpse into the alternative maps of South African London that might be further pursued. Nevertheless, there is much in Thorpe’s work for scholars of South African history and writing, London and urban histories, exile, modernity, and transnational movements.
为什么伦敦是工党:1900-2020年的都市政治史
与其他黑人移民团结一致的空间。例如,亚伯拉罕与乔治·帕德摩尔的关系以及随后的裂痕,可以追溯到他对《回到戈利》一书的回应,该书强调了他在20世纪50年代进步和“宽容”的伦敦形成的自由人文主义。在Matshikiza对20世纪60年代初伦敦的描述中,Thorpe定位了“伦敦、南非和更广泛的全球黑人想象之间的相互作用的有意义的参与”(97)。索普借鉴了包括莱斯利·詹姆斯在内的学者的作品;这本书还可以与马克·马特拉、肯尼塔·哈蒙德·佩里和罗布·沃特斯进行对话,以扩展伦敦黑人散居政治、地理和阅读文化的历史框架。这些章节以大都市男性作家的写作和经历为个案研究,以种族、阶级和性的交叉点为特色。索普详细说明了结构和类型的原因,包括南非城市写作的男子气概。这本书还包括两条“弯路”,索普探索了诺尼·贾巴武的作品,包括她担任《新斯特兰德》杂志首位黑人女编辑的时间,以及“英国黑人作家联盟的伪造者”劳蕾塔·恩科博(184),包括编辑集《顺其自然:英国黑人女作家》(1987)。这些弯路之所以如此命名,是因为它们代表了“南非作家在伦敦绘制地图的有趣消遣”(12)。这一点可能在索普将Ncgobo置于更广泛的英国黑人激进主义和女权主义伦敦网络中最为明显,在那里,她挑战了对南非黑人女作家的限制,并塑造了跨部门、反种族主义政治的方向。但是,贾巴武早期的性别期望和性别歧视经历,以及她与英国中上层阶级的亲密关系,以及她在伦敦的长期生活,也巧妙地描绘了一个不同于“种族隔离时代男性流亡的陈词滥调”(91)的故事。这些弯路引人入胜,但令人沮丧的是,它的短暂性,让我们得以一窥南非伦敦的其他地图,这些地图可能会被进一步探索。尽管如此,索普为南非历史和写作、伦敦和城市历史、流亡、现代性和跨国运动的学者们所做的工作还是很多的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
London Journal
London Journal Multiple-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The scope of The London Journal is broad, embracing all aspects of metropolitan society past and present, including comparative studies. The Journal is multi-disciplinary and is intended to interest all concerned with the understanding and enrichment of London and Londoners: historians, geographers, economists, sociologists, social workers, political scientists, planners, educationalist, archaeologists, conservationists, architects, and all those taking an interest in the fine and performing arts, the natural environment and in commentaries on metropolitan life in fiction as in fact
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信