Limitations of acoustic monitoring at wind turbines to evaluate fatality risk of bats

IF 4.3 2区 生物学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Mammal Review Pub Date : 2021-03-24 DOI:10.1111/mam.12248
Christian C. Voigt, Danilo Russo, Volker Runkel, Holger R. Goerlitz
{"title":"Limitations of acoustic monitoring at wind turbines to evaluate fatality risk of bats","authors":"Christian C. Voigt,&nbsp;Danilo Russo,&nbsp;Volker Runkel,&nbsp;Holger R. Goerlitz","doi":"10.1111/mam.12248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Wind turbines (WTs) frequently kill bats worldwide. During environmental impact assessments, consultant ecologists often use automated ultrasonic detectors (AUDs) to estimate the activity and identity of bats in the zone of highest mortality risk at WTs in order to formulate mitigation schemes, such as increased curtailment speeds to prevent casualties. While acknowledging the potential of acoustic monitoring, we evaluate the limitations of AUDs for monitoring bats at WTs and highlight directions for future research. We show that geometric attenuation and atmospheric attenuation of ultrasonic echolocation calls, in conjunction with limited sensitivity of ultrasonic microphones, severely constrain detection distances of bats at WTs. Taking into account the acoustic shadow produced by the nacelle, AUDs cover only approximately 23% of the risk zone for a bat calling at 20 kHz and 4% for a bat calling at 40 kHz, assuming a 60 m blade length. This percentage will further decrease with increasing blade lengths in modern WTs. Additionally, the directionality of echolocation calls and the dynamic flight behaviour of bats constrain the detectability of bats. If a call can be detected, the low interspecific and high intraspecific variation of echolocation call characteristics may impair species identification, limiting the power to predict population-level effects of fatalities. We conclude that technical, physical, and biological factors severely constrain acoustic monitoring in its current form. We suggest the use of several AUDs, installed at complementary sites at WTs, and the testing of other techniques, such as radar, cameras, and thermal imaging, to inform stakeholders on the mortality risk of bats at WTs.</p>","PeriodicalId":49893,"journal":{"name":"Mammal Review","volume":"51 4","pages":"559-570"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/mam.12248","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mammal Review","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mam.12248","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Wind turbines (WTs) frequently kill bats worldwide. During environmental impact assessments, consultant ecologists often use automated ultrasonic detectors (AUDs) to estimate the activity and identity of bats in the zone of highest mortality risk at WTs in order to formulate mitigation schemes, such as increased curtailment speeds to prevent casualties. While acknowledging the potential of acoustic monitoring, we evaluate the limitations of AUDs for monitoring bats at WTs and highlight directions for future research. We show that geometric attenuation and atmospheric attenuation of ultrasonic echolocation calls, in conjunction with limited sensitivity of ultrasonic microphones, severely constrain detection distances of bats at WTs. Taking into account the acoustic shadow produced by the nacelle, AUDs cover only approximately 23% of the risk zone for a bat calling at 20 kHz and 4% for a bat calling at 40 kHz, assuming a 60 m blade length. This percentage will further decrease with increasing blade lengths in modern WTs. Additionally, the directionality of echolocation calls and the dynamic flight behaviour of bats constrain the detectability of bats. If a call can be detected, the low interspecific and high intraspecific variation of echolocation call characteristics may impair species identification, limiting the power to predict population-level effects of fatalities. We conclude that technical, physical, and biological factors severely constrain acoustic monitoring in its current form. We suggest the use of several AUDs, installed at complementary sites at WTs, and the testing of other techniques, such as radar, cameras, and thermal imaging, to inform stakeholders on the mortality risk of bats at WTs.

Abstract Image

风力涡轮机声学监测评估蝙蝠死亡风险的局限性
风力涡轮机(WTs)经常杀死世界各地的蝙蝠。在环境影响评估期间,顾问生态学家经常使用自动超声波探测器(AUDs)来估计野生动植物保护区死亡风险最高区域内蝙蝠的活动和身份,以便制定缓解方案,例如提高削减速度以防止人员伤亡。在承认声学监测潜力的同时,我们评估了aud在WTs监测蝙蝠的局限性,并强调了未来研究的方向。我们发现超声波回声定位呼叫的几何衰减和大气衰减,加上超声波麦克风的有限灵敏度,严重限制了蝙蝠在WTs的探测距离。考虑到短舱产生的声学阴影,假设叶片长度为60米,对于在20 kHz频率鸣叫的蝙蝠,AUDs仅覆盖约23%的风险区域,对于在40 kHz频率鸣叫的蝙蝠,AUDs仅覆盖4%的风险区域。在现代wt中,这一比例将随着叶片长度的增加而进一步降低。此外,回声定位呼叫的方向性和蝙蝠的动态飞行行为限制了蝙蝠的可探测性。如果一种叫声可以被检测到,回声定位叫声特征的低种间和高种内变化可能会损害物种识别,限制预测种群水平死亡效应的能力。我们的结论是,技术、物理和生物因素严重限制了目前形式的声学监测。我们建议使用几个aud,安装在野生动物保护区的互补地点,并测试其他技术,如雷达、摄像机和热成像,以告知利益相关者野生动物保护区蝙蝠的死亡风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mammal Review
Mammal Review 生物-动物学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
4.10%
发文量
29
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mammal Review is the official scientific periodical of the Mammal Society, and covers all aspects of mammalian biology and ecology, including behavioural ecology, biogeography, conservation, ecology, ethology, evolution, genetics, human ecology, management, morphology, and taxonomy. We publish Reviews drawing together information from various sources in the public domain for a new synthesis or analysis of mammalian biology; Predictive Reviews using quantitative models to provide insights into mammalian biology; Perspectives presenting original views on any aspect of mammalian biology; Comments in response to papers published in Mammal Review; and Short Communications describing new findings or methods in mammalian biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信