Educational Attainment and Tobacco Harm Knowledge Among American Adults: Diminished Returns of African Americans and Hispanics.

S. Assari, M. Bazargan
{"title":"Educational Attainment and Tobacco Harm Knowledge Among American Adults: Diminished Returns of African Americans and Hispanics.","authors":"S. Assari, M. Bazargan","doi":"10.34172/ijer.2020.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objectives\nMinorities' Diminished Returns (MDRs) refer to the smaller effects of educational attainment for ethnic minorities compared to the majority group. As a result of MDRs, research has documented more than expected tobacco use among Hispanics and African Americans (AAs) with high educational attainment. In theory, some of this increased risk may be due to lower tobacco harm knowledge. Accordingly, the present study compared ethnic groups for the association between educational attainment and tobacco harm knowledge among American adults in order to better understand a potential mechanism behind MDRs of educational attainment on tobacco use of Hispanics and AAs.\n\n\nMethods\nThe current cross-sectional study used baseline data of 27,405 adults, which were obtained from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (2013) study, a nationally representative survey in the U.S. The independent and dependent variables were educational attainment and tobacco harm knowledge, respectively. In addition, age, gender, employment, and poverty status were the covariates, and ethnicity was the moderator. Finally, linear regression was used to analyze the data.\n\n\nResults\nEducational attainment was inversely associated with tobacco harm knowledge in the pooled sample (b = 0.11, 95% CI = 0.09 - 0.13). Ethnicity showed a statistically significant interaction with educational attainment (b = -0.05, 95% CI = -0.10 - 0.00 for AAs and b = -0.14, 95% CI = -0.19 - -0.09 for Hispanics versus non-Hispanics), suggesting that the effect of educational attainment on tobacco harm knowledge was smaller for Hispanics and AAs compared to non-Hispanics and Whites.\n\n\nConclusion\nIn general, although high educational attainment increases tobacco harm knowledge, highly educated Hispanics and AAs still report a disproportionately low level of tobacco harm knowledge. Eventually, the MDRs of educational attainment on tobacco harm knowledge may explain why highly educated Hispanics remain at high risk of tobacco use.","PeriodicalId":73448,"journal":{"name":"International journal of epidemiologic research","volume":"7 1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of epidemiologic research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/ijer.2020.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Background and Objectives Minorities' Diminished Returns (MDRs) refer to the smaller effects of educational attainment for ethnic minorities compared to the majority group. As a result of MDRs, research has documented more than expected tobacco use among Hispanics and African Americans (AAs) with high educational attainment. In theory, some of this increased risk may be due to lower tobacco harm knowledge. Accordingly, the present study compared ethnic groups for the association between educational attainment and tobacco harm knowledge among American adults in order to better understand a potential mechanism behind MDRs of educational attainment on tobacco use of Hispanics and AAs. Methods The current cross-sectional study used baseline data of 27,405 adults, which were obtained from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (2013) study, a nationally representative survey in the U.S. The independent and dependent variables were educational attainment and tobacco harm knowledge, respectively. In addition, age, gender, employment, and poverty status were the covariates, and ethnicity was the moderator. Finally, linear regression was used to analyze the data. Results Educational attainment was inversely associated with tobacco harm knowledge in the pooled sample (b = 0.11, 95% CI = 0.09 - 0.13). Ethnicity showed a statistically significant interaction with educational attainment (b = -0.05, 95% CI = -0.10 - 0.00 for AAs and b = -0.14, 95% CI = -0.19 - -0.09 for Hispanics versus non-Hispanics), suggesting that the effect of educational attainment on tobacco harm knowledge was smaller for Hispanics and AAs compared to non-Hispanics and Whites. Conclusion In general, although high educational attainment increases tobacco harm knowledge, highly educated Hispanics and AAs still report a disproportionately low level of tobacco harm knowledge. Eventually, the MDRs of educational attainment on tobacco harm knowledge may explain why highly educated Hispanics remain at high risk of tobacco use.
美国成年人的教育程度和烟草危害知识:非裔美国人和西班牙裔的回报率下降。
背景与目的少数民族的收益递减(mdr)是指少数民族受教育程度的影响小于多数民族。作为mdr的结果,研究表明,受过高等教育的西班牙裔和非洲裔美国人(AAs)的烟草使用情况超出预期。从理论上讲,这种风险增加的部分原因可能是烟草危害知识较低。因此,本研究比较了美国成年人受教育程度与烟草危害知识之间的关系,以便更好地了解西班牙裔和美国裔美国人受教育程度对烟草使用影响的潜在机制。方法当前的横断面研究使用了27,405名成年人的基线数据,这些数据来自于2013年美国全国代表性调查《烟草与健康人口评估》(Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health, 2013),自变量和因变量分别是受教育程度和烟草危害知识。此外,年龄、性别、就业和贫困状况是协变量,种族是调节变量。最后,采用线性回归对数据进行分析。结果合并样本中,受教育程度与烟草危害知识呈负相关(b = 0.11, 95% CI = 0.09 ~ 0.13)。种族与受教育程度的交互作用在统计上具有显著意义(西班牙裔与非西班牙裔的b = -0.05, 95% CI = -0.10 - 0.00,西班牙裔与非西班牙裔的b = -0.14, 95% CI = -0.19 - -0.09),表明受教育程度对西班牙裔和美国裔烟草危害知识的影响小于非西班牙裔和白人。结论总体而言,虽然高学历增加了烟草危害知识,但高学历的西班牙裔美国人和美国裔美国人报告的烟草危害知识水平仍然低得不成比例。最终,受教育程度对烟草危害知识的影响程度可以解释为什么受过高等教育的西班牙裔人仍然处于烟草使用的高风险中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信