On the Relationship Between Intuition, Consciousness and Cognition: In Search of a Unified Concept of Mind

Q4 Psychology

Roczniki Psychologiczne Pub Date : 2021-10-13 DOI:10.18290/rpsych21242-1s

C. Nosal

引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper argues that within contemporary neuroscience and cognitive psychology a new theoretical framework is emerging for the integrated consideration of unconscious (intuitive) processing with conscious ones. This framework requires inclusion of new theories of the brain and consciousness dynamics (Baars, Damasio, Dehaene, Friston, Gazzaniga, LeDoux), evolution of the human memory system (Tulving), and theories of procedural, associative and working memory (Baddley, Reber). Evolutionarily old intuitive processing is not unique, and it is an integral component of any cognitive processes. A revolutionary new synthesis combining intuitive and conscious processing may take the form of a mind vector integrating the two.

查看原文本刊更多论文

论直觉、意识与认知的关系:寻找统一的心灵概念

本文认为，在当代神经科学和认知心理学中，一个新的理论框架正在出现，用于综合考虑无意识（直觉）处理和有意识处理。该框架要求纳入大脑和意识动力学的新理论（Baars、Damasio、Dehaene、Friston、Gazzaniga、LeDoux）、人类记忆系统的进化（Tulving）以及程序记忆、联想记忆和工作记忆的理论（Baddley、Reber）。进化论上古老的直觉处理并不是唯一的，它是任何认知过程中不可或缺的组成部分。将直觉和意识处理相结合的革命性的新合成可以采取将两者整合的思维向量的形式。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Roczniki Psychologiczne Psychology-Psychology (all)

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Roczniki Psychologiczne / Annals of Psychology, the continuation of Annals of Philosophy: Psychology, is an academic journal edited by The Scientific Society of the John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin [Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL]. It aims to present up-to-date and original empirical results and influential theoretical considerations in various areas of psychology as well as to promote new and creative ideas in research and psychological methods. The Journal accepts contributions of three kinds: 1) original peer reviewed articles on both empirical and conceptual topics, 2) short communications, and 3) polemics, which consist of a focus article followed by peer commentaries and a response by the author of the focus article.