Psychosocial Determinants of the Need for Cognition in Individuals with High Academic Achievements

Q4 Psychology

Roczniki Psychologiczne Pub Date : 2023-02-21 DOI:10.18290/rpsych2023.0004

Agnieszka Żmuda

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the research was to verify what factors determine the level of the need for cognition (NFC) in students and doctoral students with high academic achievements. The project involved 207 participants: 102 individuals with high achievements and 105 without great scientific successes. The following tools were used: the Questionnaire of the Need for Cognition (in Polish adaptation), the Formal Characteristics of Behavior – Temperament Questionnaire Revised Version, the Popular Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire and the Questionnaire of Retrospectively Perceived Parental Attitudes. Research results indicate that in people with high academic achievement, emotional intelligence, activity and perceived mother’s inconsistency positively influence the need for cognition. In the comparison group, emotional intelligence is a positive predictor of NFC and the perceived attitude of father’s inconsistency is a negative predictor of NFC.

查看原文本刊更多论文

高学术成就个体认知需求的社会心理决定因素

本研究的目的是验证哪些因素决定了高学术成就的学生和博士生的认知需求(NFC)水平。该项目涉及207名参与者:102名有很高成就的人，105名没有重大科学成就的人。使用的工具有:《认知需求问卷》(波兰语版)、《行为气质形式特征问卷修订版》、《大众情绪智力问卷》和《父母态度回顾性感知问卷》。研究结果表明，在学业成绩较高的人群中，情绪智力、活动度和感知到的母亲不一致正向影响认知需求。在对照组中，情绪智力是NFC的正向预测因子，而父亲不一致的感知态度是NFC的负向预测因子。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Roczniki Psychologiczne Psychology-Psychology (all)

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Roczniki Psychologiczne / Annals of Psychology, the continuation of Annals of Philosophy: Psychology, is an academic journal edited by The Scientific Society of the John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin [Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL]. It aims to present up-to-date and original empirical results and influential theoretical considerations in various areas of psychology as well as to promote new and creative ideas in research and psychological methods. The Journal accepts contributions of three kinds: 1) original peer reviewed articles on both empirical and conceptual topics, 2) short communications, and 3) polemics, which consist of a focus article followed by peer commentaries and a response by the author of the focus article.