The development of institutional repositories in East Africa countries: A comparative analysis of Tanzania, Kenya, and Uganda

IASSIST quarterly Pub Date : 2021-12-26 DOI:10.29173/iq1012
Joseph Mwalubanda
{"title":"The development of institutional repositories in East Africa countries: A comparative analysis of Tanzania, Kenya, and Uganda","authors":"Joseph Mwalubanda","doi":"10.29173/iq1012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to examine the growth of IR in the East Africa region (Tanzania, Kenya, and Uganda) from 2010-2020. This study adopted a content analysis methodology. Data for this study was extracted from OpenDOAR (Directory of Open Access Repository), ROAR (Registry of Open Access Repository) and repositories websites to identify the language used, subject covered, software used and types of content that are found in East African repositories. The findings of this study reveal that East Africa region had a total number of 66 repositories, which are registered in OpenDOAR. Kenya is a leading country in the region by having 42 repositories, followed by Tanzania with 14 repositories and Uganda have 10 repositories. The findings show that there is an increase number in the of repositories in the region from 4 in 2010 to 66 in 2020, however the growth is low compared to other parts of the world like Europe, Asia, and America. The study shows the need of librarians, researchers, stakeholders, and East Africa governments to come together to overcome the challenges that hinder the growth of repositories in the region. Mandate policies formulation, training, fund support, OA awareness and technical support are needed in overcoming those challenges.\nKeywords: Institutional Repository, Open Access, Content growth, Institutional Repository software, Items types, Institutional Repository language, and subject covered in repository, East Africa region.","PeriodicalId":84870,"journal":{"name":"IASSIST quarterly","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IASSIST quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29173/iq1012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to examine the growth of IR in the East Africa region (Tanzania, Kenya, and Uganda) from 2010-2020. This study adopted a content analysis methodology. Data for this study was extracted from OpenDOAR (Directory of Open Access Repository), ROAR (Registry of Open Access Repository) and repositories websites to identify the language used, subject covered, software used and types of content that are found in East African repositories. The findings of this study reveal that East Africa region had a total number of 66 repositories, which are registered in OpenDOAR. Kenya is a leading country in the region by having 42 repositories, followed by Tanzania with 14 repositories and Uganda have 10 repositories. The findings show that there is an increase number in the of repositories in the region from 4 in 2010 to 66 in 2020, however the growth is low compared to other parts of the world like Europe, Asia, and America. The study shows the need of librarians, researchers, stakeholders, and East Africa governments to come together to overcome the challenges that hinder the growth of repositories in the region. Mandate policies formulation, training, fund support, OA awareness and technical support are needed in overcoming those challenges. Keywords: Institutional Repository, Open Access, Content growth, Institutional Repository software, Items types, Institutional Repository language, and subject covered in repository, East Africa region.
东非国家机构资料库的发展:坦桑尼亚、肯尼亚和乌干达的比较分析
本文旨在研究2010-2020年东非地区(坦桑尼亚、肯尼亚和乌干达)国际投资的增长情况。本研究采用内容分析法。本研究的数据是从开放存取资料库目录(OpenDOAR)、开放存取资料库注册表(ROAR)和资料库网站中提取的,以确定使用的语言、涵盖的主题、使用的软件和在东非资料库中发现的内容类型。本研究的结果表明,东非地区共有66个知识库,这些知识库在OpenDOAR中注册。肯尼亚是该地区领先的国家,有42个知识库,其次是坦桑尼亚,有14个知识库,乌干达有10个知识库。研究结果表明,该地区的储存库数量从2010年的4个增加到2020年的66个,但与欧洲、亚洲和美洲等世界其他地区相比,增长速度较低。该研究表明,图书馆员、研究人员、利益相关者和东非政府需要团结起来,克服阻碍该地区知识库增长的挑战。克服这些挑战需要任务规定政策的制定、培训、资金支助、对OA的认识和技术支助。关键词:机构知识库,开放获取,内容增长,机构知识库软件,项目类型,机构知识库语言,知识库涵盖的主题,东非地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信