Discussion of the Relationship between Fairness and Efficiency ——Based on Rawls' “A Theory of Justice”

Wen Feng
{"title":"Discussion of the Relationship between Fairness and Efficiency ——Based on Rawls' “A Theory of Justice”","authors":"Wen Feng","doi":"10.30564/ret.v4i4.3868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since China’s reform and opening up, from the Third Plenary Session of the 14th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China that put forward \"efficiency first and fairness\" to the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, \"first distribution and redistribution must deal with the relationship between fairness and efficiency, and redistribution pays more attention to fairness\" Distribution policy, in 2021, the tenth meeting of the Central Finance and Economics Committee clearly stated that it is necessary to promote common prosperity in stages. The relationship between fairness and efficiency has always been the basic principle and standard for the country to formulate policies, and it is also the core issue discussed by scholars. Both utilitarianism and Rawls' two principles of justice provide us with different perspectives to explore the relationship between fairness and efficiency. This article focuses on Rawls's critique of utilitarianism and the specific content of the two justice principles, and makes a simple discussion on the relationship between fairness and efficiency and its enlightenment on the formulation of distribution policies in our country.","PeriodicalId":69138,"journal":{"name":"教育理论综述(英文)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"教育理论综述(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30564/ret.v4i4.3868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Since China’s reform and opening up, from the Third Plenary Session of the 14th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China that put forward "efficiency first and fairness" to the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, "first distribution and redistribution must deal with the relationship between fairness and efficiency, and redistribution pays more attention to fairness" Distribution policy, in 2021, the tenth meeting of the Central Finance and Economics Committee clearly stated that it is necessary to promote common prosperity in stages. The relationship between fairness and efficiency has always been the basic principle and standard for the country to formulate policies, and it is also the core issue discussed by scholars. Both utilitarianism and Rawls' two principles of justice provide us with different perspectives to explore the relationship between fairness and efficiency. This article focuses on Rawls's critique of utilitarianism and the specific content of the two justice principles, and makes a simple discussion on the relationship between fairness and efficiency and its enlightenment on the formulation of distribution policies in our country.
论公平与效率的关系——基于罗尔斯的“正义论”
改革开放以来,从党的十四届三中全会提出的“效率第一、公平第一”到党的十八大提出的“先分配再分配要处理好公平与效率的关系,再分配更注重公平”的分配政策,2021年中央财经委员会第十次会议明确提出,要分阶段推进共同富裕。公平与效率的关系一直是国家制定政策的基本原则和标准,也是学者们探讨的核心问题。功利主义和罗尔斯的两个正义原则都为我们探讨公平与效率的关系提供了不同的视角。本文围绕罗尔斯对功利主义的批判和两种正义原则的具体内容,简单探讨公平与效率的关系及其对我国分配政策制定的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
145
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信