Genomic Differences Between Carbapenem-susceptible and Carbapenem-resistant Escherichia Coli Analyzed by Whole-genome Sequencing

Qiong Wu, Jun Hu, Jianqiang Wang, Yungai Li, Yu-Jiao Pan, Ronglian Chen, Jin Tang
{"title":"Genomic Differences Between Carbapenem-susceptible and Carbapenem-resistant Escherichia Coli Analyzed by Whole-genome Sequencing","authors":"Qiong Wu, Jun Hu, Jianqiang Wang, Yungai Li, Yu-Jiao Pan, Ronglian Chen, Jin Tang","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-113332/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Background The widespread resistance to carbapenem via Enterobacteriaceae is a major public health concern. To investigate the reason for the change of Escherichia coli from carbapenem-susceptible to carbapenem-resistant status after antibiotic therapy, whole-genome sequencing was applied for the analysis of genetic difference between the two isolates. The genome of the two isolates of Escherichia coli with distinct resistant phenotypes recovered from one patient was sequenced and compared. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms and insertions/deletions were analyzed using software MUMmer (http://mummer.sourceforge.net/). Results The homology of chromosomes, plasmid 1, and plasmid 2 between the two isolates was very high (>99.5%). However, the coverage ratio of plasmid 3 was only 7.13%. This plasmid harbored the IMP-4 carbapenemase-coding gene. The upstream of blaIMP-4 was the plasmid mobilization relaxosome protein Mobe gene and the downstream were class 1 integrom integrase IntI1 and IS6 family transposase IS15DIV, which may be related to carbapenemase gene capture. Conclusions Single-nucleotide mutation, insertion, and deletion could not result in the development of resistance to carbapenem, whereas acquisition of the IMP-4-encoding gene may be the reason for changes in resistance to carbapenem.","PeriodicalId":92491,"journal":{"name":"Clinical microbiology and infectious diseases","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical microbiology and infectious diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-113332/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background The widespread resistance to carbapenem via Enterobacteriaceae is a major public health concern. To investigate the reason for the change of Escherichia coli from carbapenem-susceptible to carbapenem-resistant status after antibiotic therapy, whole-genome sequencing was applied for the analysis of genetic difference between the two isolates. The genome of the two isolates of Escherichia coli with distinct resistant phenotypes recovered from one patient was sequenced and compared. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms and insertions/deletions were analyzed using software MUMmer (http://mummer.sourceforge.net/). Results The homology of chromosomes, plasmid 1, and plasmid 2 between the two isolates was very high (>99.5%). However, the coverage ratio of plasmid 3 was only 7.13%. This plasmid harbored the IMP-4 carbapenemase-coding gene. The upstream of blaIMP-4 was the plasmid mobilization relaxosome protein Mobe gene and the downstream were class 1 integrom integrase IntI1 and IS6 family transposase IS15DIV, which may be related to carbapenemase gene capture. Conclusions Single-nucleotide mutation, insertion, and deletion could not result in the development of resistance to carbapenem, whereas acquisition of the IMP-4-encoding gene may be the reason for changes in resistance to carbapenem.
应用全基因组测序技术分析碳青霉烯敏感和碳青霉烯抗性大肠杆菌的基因组差异
背景通过肠杆菌科对碳青霉烯的广泛耐药性是一个主要的公共卫生问题。为了探讨抗生素治疗后大肠杆菌由碳青霉烯敏感状态转变为碳青霉烯耐药状态的原因,应用全基因组测序方法分析了两个分离株的遗传差异。对从一名患者身上回收的具有不同抗性表型的两个大肠杆菌分离株的基因组进行测序和比较。使用MUMmer软件分析单核苷酸多态性和插入/缺失(http://mummer.sourceforge.net/)。结果两株分离株的染色体、质粒1和质粒2的同源性很高(>99.5%),但质粒3的覆盖率仅为7.13%,该质粒携带IMP-4碳青霉烯酶编码基因。blaIMP-4的上游是质粒动员松弛体蛋白Mobe基因,下游是1类整合子整合酶IntI1和IS6家族转座酶IS15DIV,这可能与碳青霉烯酶基因捕获有关。结论单核苷酸突变、插入和缺失不可能导致对碳青霉烯类药物耐药性的发展,而IMP-4编码基因的获得可能是导致耐药性变化的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书