Factors influencing truth-telling by healthcare providers to terminally ill cancer patients at Ocean Road Cancer Institute in Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania

IF 0.5 Q4 MEDICAL ETHICS
R. Athanas, F. Gasto, S. J. Renatha
{"title":"Factors influencing truth-telling by healthcare providers to terminally ill cancer patients at Ocean Road Cancer Institute in Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania","authors":"R. Athanas, F. Gasto, S. J. Renatha","doi":"10.7196/SAJBL.2020.V13I2.00706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:  Widely accepted international clinical ethics standards and Tanzania’s national cancer treatments guidelines mandate that healthcare providers give patients the information they want or need in an understandable way. However, adherence to these standards is low particularly in developing countries. In Tanzania, little is known regarding the views and practice of disclosure of diagnosis and prognosis to cancer patients. Objective:  In this study, we aimed at examining the factors influencing truth-telling by healthcare providers to terminally ill cancer patients at Ocean Road Cancer Institute (ORCI) in Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of healthcare providers (n=13) and terminally ill cancer patients (n=8) in English and Swahili. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and translated to English. Results: Study findings show unsatisfactory experience of truth-telling according to international clinical standards. Many healthcare providers emphasized many barriers including: limited communication skills, limited time, a high volume of patients and lack of privacy for communication. Patients’ preferences and readiness to information as well as family collusion were identified as barriers, whereas communalism was identified as facilitator to truth-telling. Conclusion: We identified several barriers and facilitators of truth-telling that may be targeted in order to promote high-quality communication at ORCI. Our results support advocacy for improvements like: training for clinical communication skills and information sharing, space designated to enhance privacy, deliberate efforts to employ enough providers to care for the increasing volume of patients, and need of counselling session with patients and family members prior to clinical information disclosure","PeriodicalId":43498,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Bioethics and Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Bioethics and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJBL.2020.V13I2.00706","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background:  Widely accepted international clinical ethics standards and Tanzania’s national cancer treatments guidelines mandate that healthcare providers give patients the information they want or need in an understandable way. However, adherence to these standards is low particularly in developing countries. In Tanzania, little is known regarding the views and practice of disclosure of diagnosis and prognosis to cancer patients. Objective:  In this study, we aimed at examining the factors influencing truth-telling by healthcare providers to terminally ill cancer patients at Ocean Road Cancer Institute (ORCI) in Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of healthcare providers (n=13) and terminally ill cancer patients (n=8) in English and Swahili. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and translated to English. Results: Study findings show unsatisfactory experience of truth-telling according to international clinical standards. Many healthcare providers emphasized many barriers including: limited communication skills, limited time, a high volume of patients and lack of privacy for communication. Patients’ preferences and readiness to information as well as family collusion were identified as barriers, whereas communalism was identified as facilitator to truth-telling. Conclusion: We identified several barriers and facilitators of truth-telling that may be targeted in order to promote high-quality communication at ORCI. Our results support advocacy for improvements like: training for clinical communication skills and information sharing, space designated to enhance privacy, deliberate efforts to employ enough providers to care for the increasing volume of patients, and need of counselling session with patients and family members prior to clinical information disclosure
坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆海洋路癌症研究所医疗保健提供者向癌症绝症患者进行真相推销的影响因素
背景:广泛接受的国际临床伦理标准和坦桑尼亚国家癌症治疗指南要求医疗保健提供者以可理解的方式向患者提供他们想要或需要的信息。然而,遵守这些标准的程度很低,特别是在发展中国家。在坦桑尼亚,关于向癌症患者披露诊断和预后的观点和实践知之甚少。目的:在这项研究中,我们旨在检验坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆癌症海洋路研究所(ORCI)医疗保健提供者对癌症绝症患者进行真相推销的影响因素。方法:我们用英语和斯瓦希里语对医疗保健提供者(n=13)和绝症癌症患者(n=8)进行了半结构化访谈。采访被记录下来,逐字逐句转录,并翻译成英文。结果:研究结果显示,根据国际临床标准,讲真话的体验并不令人满意。许多医疗保健提供者强调了许多障碍,包括:沟通技能有限、时间有限、患者人数多以及缺乏沟通隐私。患者的偏好和对信息的准备以及家庭勾结被认为是障碍,而社群主义被认为是讲真话的促进者。结论:为了促进ORCI的高质量沟通,我们确定了讲真话的几个障碍和推动者。我们的研究结果支持了对改进的倡导,如:临床沟通技能和信息共享的培训,指定用于增强隐私的空间,有意雇佣足够的提供者来照顾不断增加的患者数量,以及在临床信息披露之前需要与患者和家人进行咨询
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
18
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信