A Few More Words for a Few More Cents: The Roles of Beneficiary and Message Frames during a Door-to-Door Donation Collection

IF 1.3 Q3 BUSINESS
A. Beldad, Ismay L. Bax, Joris J. van Hoof
{"title":"A Few More Words for a Few More Cents: The Roles of Beneficiary and Message Frames during a Door-to-Door Donation Collection","authors":"A. Beldad, Ismay L. Bax, Joris J. van Hoof","doi":"10.1080/10495142.2022.2130494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Door-to-door collections provide an essential source of income for charitable organizations. Unfortunately, the effectiveness of a door-to-door donation collection technique has been waning in recent years. Previous studies have shown that framing can improve the effectiveness of charitable appeals. Hence, this research aims at gaining insights into the possible effects of framing charitable appeals on donation behavior in a door-to-door collection context. A field experiment, employing a door-to-door collection for a Dutch charitable organization, using a 2x3 between-subjects design, was conducted with 528 households in a Dutch municipality. Results show that of the two framing types (beneficiary frame and message frame) used for the door-to-door collection technique, only message frame influences the amount donated to the charitable organization, as the use of a loss frame appeal resulted in a higher amount of money donated than the use of a gain frame appeal. Moreover, when compared to the current practice of just requesting for a small donation without any message element (the control condition), including message elements to the door-to-door collection script did not improve people’s donation behavior and increase the amount donated. These findings have important implications for how door-to-door collections must be performed.","PeriodicalId":46735,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing","volume":"35 1","pages":"414 - 437"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2022.2130494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Door-to-door collections provide an essential source of income for charitable organizations. Unfortunately, the effectiveness of a door-to-door donation collection technique has been waning in recent years. Previous studies have shown that framing can improve the effectiveness of charitable appeals. Hence, this research aims at gaining insights into the possible effects of framing charitable appeals on donation behavior in a door-to-door collection context. A field experiment, employing a door-to-door collection for a Dutch charitable organization, using a 2x3 between-subjects design, was conducted with 528 households in a Dutch municipality. Results show that of the two framing types (beneficiary frame and message frame) used for the door-to-door collection technique, only message frame influences the amount donated to the charitable organization, as the use of a loss frame appeal resulted in a higher amount of money donated than the use of a gain frame appeal. Moreover, when compared to the current practice of just requesting for a small donation without any message element (the control condition), including message elements to the door-to-door collection script did not improve people’s donation behavior and increase the amount donated. These findings have important implications for how door-to-door collections must be performed.
多说几句话,多赚几分钱:在挨家挨户的捐赠收集中,受益人和信息框架的角色
上门募捐是慈善组织重要的收入来源。不幸的是,近年来,这种挨家挨户的捐赠收集技术的有效性一直在下降。先前的研究表明,框架可以提高慈善呼吁的有效性。因此,本研究旨在深入了解在挨家挨户募捐的背景下,制定慈善呼吁对捐赠行为的可能影响。一项现场实验,采用荷兰慈善组织的挨家挨户收集,采用2x3受试者之间的设计,在荷兰市政当局的528个家庭中进行。结果表明,在上门募捐技术中使用的两种框架类型(受益人框架和信息框架)中,只有信息框架影响慈善组织的捐款数额,因为使用损失框架申诉导致的捐款数额高于使用收益框架申诉。此外,与目前只要求小额捐赠而没有任何消息元素(控制条件)的做法相比,在上门募捐脚本中加入消息元素并没有改善人们的捐赠行为,也没有增加捐赠金额。这些发现对于如何进行挨家挨户的收集具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信