{"title":"Isolated Bilateral Macular Edema due to Le Fort Type 1 and Mandibular Fracture: A Case Report","authors":"K. Zor, Erkut Kucuk, Ç. S. Salbaş, G. Biçer","doi":"10.14744/bej.2022.86548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We report the diagnosis and follow-up process of a case who had bilateral macular edema after blunt facial trauma. A 36-year-old male patient with Le Fort type 1 and mandibular fracture without direct ocular trauma referred to the ophthalmology clinic. Visual acuity was 0.1 in both eyes according to Snellen chart. Ocular examination was normal except bilateral macular edema. The patient did not have any prior systemic or neurological diseases. The patient did not have cotton-wool spots, retinal hemorrhage, or Purtscher flecken in the fundus examination. He used topical 0.1% nepafenac solution for 1 month. Visual acuity returned to normal after complete resolution of the macular edema at 1 month and did not recur in the follow-up. We think that this case may be an isolated macular edema due to facial trauma or an atypical presentation of Purtscher retinopathy. Although facial fractures and trauma may cause Purtscher retinopathy with involvement of different retinal structures, the findings in this case suggest that isolated involvement of macula can also occur in these injuries.","PeriodicalId":8740,"journal":{"name":"Beyoglu Eye Journal","volume":"7 1","pages":"150 - 153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Beyoglu Eye Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/bej.2022.86548","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We report the diagnosis and follow-up process of a case who had bilateral macular edema after blunt facial trauma. A 36-year-old male patient with Le Fort type 1 and mandibular fracture without direct ocular trauma referred to the ophthalmology clinic. Visual acuity was 0.1 in both eyes according to Snellen chart. Ocular examination was normal except bilateral macular edema. The patient did not have any prior systemic or neurological diseases. The patient did not have cotton-wool spots, retinal hemorrhage, or Purtscher flecken in the fundus examination. He used topical 0.1% nepafenac solution for 1 month. Visual acuity returned to normal after complete resolution of the macular edema at 1 month and did not recur in the follow-up. We think that this case may be an isolated macular edema due to facial trauma or an atypical presentation of Purtscher retinopathy. Although facial fractures and trauma may cause Purtscher retinopathy with involvement of different retinal structures, the findings in this case suggest that isolated involvement of macula can also occur in these injuries.
我们报告了一例面部钝性创伤后双侧黄斑水肿的诊断和随访过程。一名36岁的男性患者,患有Le Fort 1型下颌骨骨折,无直接眼部创伤,转诊至眼科诊所。根据Snellen表,双眼的视力为0.1。除双侧黄斑水肿外,眼部检查正常。患者之前没有任何系统或神经系统疾病。患者眼底检查无棉絮斑点、视网膜出血或Purtscher斑点。他使用0.1%奈帕那克局部溶液治疗1个月。黄斑水肿在1个月完全消退后,视力恢复正常,随访中没有复发。我们认为这个病例可能是由于面部创伤引起的孤立性黄斑水肿,或者是Purtscher视网膜病变的非典型表现。尽管面部骨折和创伤可能导致不同视网膜结构的Purtscher视网膜病变,但本例的研究结果表明,这些损伤也可能发生黄斑的孤立受累。