Mina Park, Eun Kyoung Choi, H. Lee, Hyeon Eun Park, Altantuya Chinbayar
{"title":"Resilience-Promoting Programs in Families of Children With Cancer: A Systematic Review","authors":"Mina Park, Eun Kyoung Choi, H. Lee, Hyeon Eun Park, Altantuya Chinbayar","doi":"10.1177/27527530211055997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Pediatric cancer is a difficult experience for children and their families. It is thus necessary to promote family resilience for the effective treatment and quality of life improvement among children with cancer. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the components of a resilience-promoting program for children with cancer and their families and to synthesize the literature findings on the outcomes of the resilience-promoting program. Method: A systematic search of the literature was conducted using five databases (PubMed, CHIAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Research Information Sharing Service) up to July 22, 2020. The search was limited to studies published in English and Korean, and to grey literature published in Korea. Studies were critically appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Extracted data were summarized as tables. Results: Eight studies were selected. The main components of the resilience-promoting program were providing information (on strategies, medical and psychoeducation, and community resources) and emotional coping (expressing feeling, reappraising cognition about adversity, and stress management). The main outcomes of these programs were reinforced outcomes (resilience, benefit finding, coping, positive affect, problem-solving skills, family adaptation, and self-concept) and improved outcomes (in depression, posttraumatic stress, anxiety, impact of illness of the family, and mood). Conclusion: As the components and outcomes of family resilience-promoting programs vary, it is necessary to consistently use valid tools to effectively identify interventions. Additionally, various methodological studies are required to further analyze the effect of these programs.","PeriodicalId":29692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27527530211055997","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Purpose: Pediatric cancer is a difficult experience for children and their families. It is thus necessary to promote family resilience for the effective treatment and quality of life improvement among children with cancer. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the components of a resilience-promoting program for children with cancer and their families and to synthesize the literature findings on the outcomes of the resilience-promoting program. Method: A systematic search of the literature was conducted using five databases (PubMed, CHIAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Research Information Sharing Service) up to July 22, 2020. The search was limited to studies published in English and Korean, and to grey literature published in Korea. Studies were critically appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Extracted data were summarized as tables. Results: Eight studies were selected. The main components of the resilience-promoting program were providing information (on strategies, medical and psychoeducation, and community resources) and emotional coping (expressing feeling, reappraising cognition about adversity, and stress management). The main outcomes of these programs were reinforced outcomes (resilience, benefit finding, coping, positive affect, problem-solving skills, family adaptation, and self-concept) and improved outcomes (in depression, posttraumatic stress, anxiety, impact of illness of the family, and mood). Conclusion: As the components and outcomes of family resilience-promoting programs vary, it is necessary to consistently use valid tools to effectively identify interventions. Additionally, various methodological studies are required to further analyze the effect of these programs.
目的:儿童癌症对儿童及其家庭来说是一种艰难的经历。因此,有必要促进家庭复原力,以有效治疗和改善癌症儿童的生活质量。本系统综述的目的是确定癌症儿童及其家庭恢复力促进计划的组成部分,并综合有关恢复力促进计划结果的文献发现。方法:系统检索截至2020年7月22日的5个数据库(PubMed、CHIAHL、PsycINFO、Web of Science和Research Information Sharing Service)的文献。检索仅限于用英语和韩语发表的研究,以及在韩国发表的灰色文献。使用混合方法评估工具和Cochrane偏倚风险工具对研究进行严格评估。提取的数据汇总成表格。结果:入选8项研究。复原力促进计划的主要组成部分是提供信息(关于策略、医疗和心理教育以及社区资源)和情绪应对(表达感受、重新评估对逆境的认知和压力管理)。这些项目的主要结果是强化结果(恢复力、利益发现、应对、积极影响、解决问题的技能、家庭适应和自我概念)和改善结果(抑郁、创伤后应激、焦虑、家庭疾病的影响和情绪)。结论:由于家庭弹性促进项目的组成部分和结果各不相同,因此有必要始终如一地使用有效的工具来有效识别干预措施。此外,还需要进行各种方法学研究来进一步分析这些项目的效果。