{"title":"Authorship Candidates for Arden of Faversham: Kyd, Shakespeare, and Thomas Watson","authors":"B. Vickers","doi":"10.1353/sip.2021.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In the first half of the twentieth century, five scholars working in four different languages ascribed the anonymous 1592 tragedy Arden of Faversham to Thomas Kyd. Since 1963, however, attribution studies of Arden have been dominated by the influence of MacDonald P. Jackson, who has repeatedly rejected Kyd while attributing sections of the play to William Shakespeare. Thanks to Jackson, the play was included in The New Oxford Shakespeare, and a new search for potential coauthors has nominated a wide range of candidates. The New Oxford Shakespeare's general editor, Gary Taylor, has published two essays claiming Thomas Watson as coauthor of Arden, one based on stylometric evidence and another arguing from literary and theatrical history. In this essay, I evaluate the methods Taylor has used to reach this conclusion and reconsider the merits of the evidence he has deployed, arguing against Watson's authorship of Arden and offering a renewed case for viewing Kyd as the play's author.","PeriodicalId":45500,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN PHILOLOGY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/sip.2021.0011","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STUDIES IN PHILOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sip.2021.0011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract:In the first half of the twentieth century, five scholars working in four different languages ascribed the anonymous 1592 tragedy Arden of Faversham to Thomas Kyd. Since 1963, however, attribution studies of Arden have been dominated by the influence of MacDonald P. Jackson, who has repeatedly rejected Kyd while attributing sections of the play to William Shakespeare. Thanks to Jackson, the play was included in The New Oxford Shakespeare, and a new search for potential coauthors has nominated a wide range of candidates. The New Oxford Shakespeare's general editor, Gary Taylor, has published two essays claiming Thomas Watson as coauthor of Arden, one based on stylometric evidence and another arguing from literary and theatrical history. In this essay, I evaluate the methods Taylor has used to reach this conclusion and reconsider the merits of the evidence he has deployed, arguing against Watson's authorship of Arden and offering a renewed case for viewing Kyd as the play's author.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1903, Studies in Philology addresses scholars in a wide range of disciplines, though traditionally its strength has been English Medieval and Renaissance studies. SIP publishes articles on British literature before 1900 and on relations between British literature and works in the Classical, Romance, and Germanic Languages.