Using Qualitative Data Analysis Software to Support Digital Research Workflows

IF 4.6 3区管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT

Human Resource Development Review Pub Date : 2022-11-04 DOI:10.1177/15344843221138381

T. Paulus

引用次数: 6

Abstract

While software packages such as NVivo are typically considered useful for qualitative data analysis, in actuality they are powerful and flexible enough to serve as the central component of a robust digital research workflow. Various features of these packages can be used across the entire research process from reviewing the literature to writing up the study’s findings. This article provides an overview of available qualitative data analysis software (QDAS) packages, including how to: use software tactics to enact research design strategies; select an appropriate QDAS package; report the use of software in the research report; and consider implications of QDAS use for human resource development scholars.

查看原文本刊更多论文

使用定性数据分析软件支持数字研究工作流程

虽然NVivo等软件包通常被认为对定性数据分析有用，但事实上，它们足够强大和灵活，可以作为稳健的数字研究工作流程的核心组成部分。这些软件包的各种功能可以在整个研究过程中使用，从查阅文献到撰写研究结果。本文概述了可用的定性数据分析软件包，包括如何：使用软件策略制定研究设计策略；选择合适的QDAS包；在研究报告中报告软件的使用情况；并考虑QDAS的使用对人力资源开发学者的影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Human Resource Development Review MANAGEMENT-

CiteScore

9.60

自引率

17.20%

发文量

期刊介绍： As described elsewhere, Human Resource Development Review is a theory development journal for scholars of human resource development and related disciplines. Human Resource Development Review publishes articles that make theoretical contributions on theory development, foundations of HRD, theory building methods, and integrative reviews of the relevant literature. Papers whose central focus is empirical findings, including empirical method and design are not considered for publication in Human Resource Development Review. This journal encourages submissions that provide new theoretical insights to advance our understanding of human resource development and related disciplines. Such papers may include syntheses of existing bodies of theory, new substantive theories, exploratory conceptual models, taxonomies and typology developed as foundations for theory, treatises in formal theory construction, papers on the history of theory, critique of theory that includes alternative research propositions, metatheory, and integrative literature reviews with strong theoretical implications. Papers addressing foundations of HRD might address philosophies of HRD, historical foundations, definitions of the field, conceptual organization of the field, and ethical foundations. Human Resource Development Review takes a multi-paradigm view of theory building so submissions from different paradigms are encouraged.