Examination of the Shear Force Resistance of Laminate Veneers Adhered with Different Resin Cements

Q3 Dentistry
Zeynep Yeşil Duymuş, Emel Arslan
{"title":"Examination of the Shear Force Resistance of Laminate Veneers Adhered with Different Resin Cements","authors":"Zeynep Yeşil Duymuş, Emel Arslan","doi":"10.7126/cumudj.1187835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the mechanical properties of laminate veneers to determine their resistance to the shear force of three different types of cement used in the restorations. \nMATERIAL and METHODS: Laminate veneers were prepared using the standard tooth preparation methods for 30 extracted maxillary central incisors. To standardize the depth, guide burs were used to prepare a depth of 0.5 mm from the buccal angle. The samples were allocated into three randomized groups (n = 10): Group A (resin using the total etch method and Variolink Esthetic DC resin cement; Group B (resin using the PANAVIA F2.0 self-etch method; and Group C (self-adhesion bonded with Rely X U200 resin cement). The prepared specimens were stored in distilled water for one week before a shear test was used to determine the resistance of the veneers to the bonding. The obtained data were evaluated statistically. \nRESULTS: The values of the shear bond strength were statistically significant depending on the type of resin cement that was applied (p ˂ 0.05). The specimens that were cemented using the total-etch method (18.79±4.48 MPa) had the lowest shear force value. The obtained data were evaluated statistically by Tukey multiple comparison test (p > 0.05). \nCONCLUSIONS: The cement is a highly effective factor in the bonding between fixed prosthetic restorations and the abutment tooth, and the cement used must have sufficient resistance to shear forces.","PeriodicalId":10781,"journal":{"name":"Cumhuriyet Dental Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cumhuriyet Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1187835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the mechanical properties of laminate veneers to determine their resistance to the shear force of three different types of cement used in the restorations. MATERIAL and METHODS: Laminate veneers were prepared using the standard tooth preparation methods for 30 extracted maxillary central incisors. To standardize the depth, guide burs were used to prepare a depth of 0.5 mm from the buccal angle. The samples were allocated into three randomized groups (n = 10): Group A (resin using the total etch method and Variolink Esthetic DC resin cement; Group B (resin using the PANAVIA F2.0 self-etch method; and Group C (self-adhesion bonded with Rely X U200 resin cement). The prepared specimens were stored in distilled water for one week before a shear test was used to determine the resistance of the veneers to the bonding. The obtained data were evaluated statistically. RESULTS: The values of the shear bond strength were statistically significant depending on the type of resin cement that was applied (p ˂ 0.05). The specimens that were cemented using the total-etch method (18.79±4.48 MPa) had the lowest shear force value. The obtained data were evaluated statistically by Tukey multiple comparison test (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The cement is a highly effective factor in the bonding between fixed prosthetic restorations and the abutment tooth, and the cement used must have sufficient resistance to shear forces.
不同树脂胶结剂粘结层压单板的抗剪切性能研究
目的:本研究探讨了层压贴面的力学性能,以确定其对三种不同类型的水泥在修复中使用的剪切力的抵抗。材料与方法:对30例拔除的上颌中切牙,采用标准制牙方法制备层压贴面。为了使深度标准化,使用导毛刺从颊角处准备0.5 mm的深度。将样本随机分为3组(n = 10): A组(树脂采用全蚀刻法和Variolink aesthetic DC树脂水泥;B组树脂采用PANAVIA F2.0自蚀刻法;C组(以Rely X U200树脂水泥自粘接)。将制备好的试件在蒸馏水中保存一周,然后进行剪切试验,以确定贴面对粘结的阻力。对所得数据进行统计学评价。结果:抗剪粘结强度值根据所应用的树脂水泥的类型有统计学意义(p小于0.05)。采用全蚀刻法胶结的试件剪切力值(18.79±4.48 MPa)最小。所得资料采用Tukey多重比较检验进行统计学评价(p < 0.05)。结论:骨水泥是固定修复体与基牙粘结的有效因素,所使用的骨水泥必须具有足够的抗剪切力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信