Comparison of oral health characteristics in pediatric cancer and cancer free patients: A multicenter study

IF 0.6 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Chantal Kerbage , Anthony T. Macari , Anthony Kerbage , Nada Chedid
{"title":"Comparison of oral health characteristics in pediatric cancer and cancer free patients: A multicenter study","authors":"Chantal Kerbage ,&nbsp;Anthony T. Macari ,&nbsp;Anthony Kerbage ,&nbsp;Nada Chedid","doi":"10.1016/j.pdj.2023.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Comparing oral health of cancer to non-cancer children proves that cancer and its treatment can cause oral complications.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Two groups of children, 50 treated for cancer, and 51 cancer-free, at two different centers, signed informed consent<span> forms. Both the examination of teeth, oral functions and soft tissue with a questionnaire including the patients’ demographic characteristics, medical history, dietary and oral hygiene, and changes due to the oncologic treatment allowed gathering data.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The two groups had no demographic nor socio-economic differences. Dietary habits were not significantly different. Daily brushing was more frequent in cancer-free (96.1%) versus sick (76%) children. Oral hygiene was poor (34%) or very poor (24%) in cancer patients and average for non-cancer subjects (68.6%). Cancer patients had more caries, without significant differences between groups. Gingiva<span><span> was healthy in 96.1% of non-cancer and 76% of cancer patients (p = 0.044). In cancer patients, intra-oral soft tissue lesions were aphtous ulcers (52.9%), </span>candidiasis<span> (23.5%), and herpes (17.6%). Xerostomia was significantly different (p = 0.001) between cancer (32%) and non-cancer subjects (3.9%). Chemotherapy alone is an independent predictor of poor oral health (HR 17.7, 95% CI [5.2–60.9], p &lt; 0.001).</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Cancer patients had poor oral health compared to non-cancer children, with insufficient knowledge concerning the relationship between oral and general health. Education programs, screenings and treatment at cancer centers may help reduce risks of complications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19977,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Dental Journal","volume":"33 2","pages":"Pages 139-146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0917239423000253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Comparing oral health of cancer to non-cancer children proves that cancer and its treatment can cause oral complications.

Design

Two groups of children, 50 treated for cancer, and 51 cancer-free, at two different centers, signed informed consent forms. Both the examination of teeth, oral functions and soft tissue with a questionnaire including the patients’ demographic characteristics, medical history, dietary and oral hygiene, and changes due to the oncologic treatment allowed gathering data.

Results

The two groups had no demographic nor socio-economic differences. Dietary habits were not significantly different. Daily brushing was more frequent in cancer-free (96.1%) versus sick (76%) children. Oral hygiene was poor (34%) or very poor (24%) in cancer patients and average for non-cancer subjects (68.6%). Cancer patients had more caries, without significant differences between groups. Gingiva was healthy in 96.1% of non-cancer and 76% of cancer patients (p = 0.044). In cancer patients, intra-oral soft tissue lesions were aphtous ulcers (52.9%), candidiasis (23.5%), and herpes (17.6%). Xerostomia was significantly different (p = 0.001) between cancer (32%) and non-cancer subjects (3.9%). Chemotherapy alone is an independent predictor of poor oral health (HR 17.7, 95% CI [5.2–60.9], p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Cancer patients had poor oral health compared to non-cancer children, with insufficient knowledge concerning the relationship between oral and general health. Education programs, screenings and treatment at cancer centers may help reduce risks of complications.

儿童癌症患者与非癌症患者口腔健康特征的比较:一项多中心研究
将癌症儿童与非癌症儿童的口腔健康状况进行比较,证明癌症及其治疗可引起口腔并发症。设计两组儿童,50名接受癌症治疗,51名未患癌症,在两个不同的中心签署知情同意书。通过对牙齿、口腔功能和软组织的检查和问卷调查,包括患者的人口统计学特征、病史、饮食和口腔卫生以及肿瘤治疗引起的变化,可以收集数据。结果两组没有人口统计学和社会经济差异。饮食习惯差异不显著。无癌儿童(96.1%)每天刷牙的频率高于患病儿童(76%)。癌症患者的口腔卫生差(34%)或非常差(24%),非癌症受试者的平均水平(68.6%)。癌症患者有更多的龋齿,组间无显著差异。96.1%的非癌症患者牙龈健康,76%的癌症患者牙龈健康(p = 0.044)。在癌症患者中,口腔内软组织病变主要为无孔溃疡(52.9%)、念珠菌病(23.5%)和疱疹(17.6%)。癌症患者(32%)和非癌症患者(3.9%)的口干性差异有统计学意义(p = 0.001)。单独化疗是口腔健康状况不佳的独立预测因子(HR 17.7, 95% CI [5.2-60.9], p <0.001)。结论癌症患儿口腔健康状况较非癌症患儿差,对口腔与整体健康的关系认识不足。癌症中心的教育项目、筛查和治疗可能有助于降低并发症的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Dental Journal
Pediatric Dental Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
26 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信