Analisis Butir Soal pada Instrumen Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum Literasi Membaca di SMP IT Insan Utama Pekanbaru

Della Putri Andini, M. Mukhlis
{"title":"Analisis Butir Soal pada Instrumen Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum Literasi Membaca di SMP IT Insan Utama Pekanbaru","authors":"Della Putri Andini, M. Mukhlis","doi":"10.30872/diglosia.v6i2.658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Minimum Competency Assessment (AKM) assesses fundamental skills required for all students to help them improve their skills and participate actively in society. The AKM aims to identify assessment data or reports on students' understanding of the material. The AKM is very important for teachers because it provides an objective measure of learning performance, and for students, the results of this assessment indicate their level of learning achievement. This study aims to describe the results of the analysis of the AKM reading literacy items at SMP IT Insan Utama Pekanbaru. The research method used is a descriptive qualitative method with content analysis. Based on the study's results, the percentage results of the difficulty level analysis of the guiding items were that 70% of the questions were categorized as difficult, 25% were moderate, and 5% were easy. It means that too many questions are difficult. The results of the calculation of differentiating power show that 40% of the questions are very good, 20% are good, 10% are sufficient, and 30% are bad. The analysis of the effectiveness of the checkers shows that 5% of the questions are very good, 15% good, 10% not good enough, 20% bad, 15% very bad.","PeriodicalId":33926,"journal":{"name":"Diglosia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diglosia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v6i2.658","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Minimum Competency Assessment (AKM) assesses fundamental skills required for all students to help them improve their skills and participate actively in society. The AKM aims to identify assessment data or reports on students' understanding of the material. The AKM is very important for teachers because it provides an objective measure of learning performance, and for students, the results of this assessment indicate their level of learning achievement. This study aims to describe the results of the analysis of the AKM reading literacy items at SMP IT Insan Utama Pekanbaru. The research method used is a descriptive qualitative method with content analysis. Based on the study's results, the percentage results of the difficulty level analysis of the guiding items were that 70% of the questions were categorized as difficult, 25% were moderate, and 5% were easy. It means that too many questions are difficult. The results of the calculation of differentiating power show that 40% of the questions are very good, 20% are good, 10% are sufficient, and 30% are bad. The analysis of the effectiveness of the checkers shows that 5% of the questions are very good, 15% good, 10% not good enough, 20% bad, 15% very bad.
SMP IT专业学生仪表最低能力文献阅读项目分析
最低能力评估(AKM)评估所有学生所需的基本技能,以帮助他们提高技能并积极参与社会。AKM旨在确定学生对材料理解的评估数据或报告。AKM对教师来说非常重要,因为它为学习表现提供了一个客观的衡量标准,对学生来说,这个评估的结果表明了他们的学习成就水平。本研究的目的是描述在SMP IT Insan Utama Pekanbaru阅读素养项目的分析结果。研究方法采用描述性定性方法,并结合内容分析。根据研究结果,指导题难度等级分析的百分比结果为:70%的问题为困难,25%为中等,5%为容易。这意味着太多的问题是困难的。微分幂的计算结果表明,40%的问题很好,20%的问题很好,10%的问题很好,30%的问题很差。对检查者的有效性分析表明,5%的问题非常好,15%的问题很好,10%的问题不够好,20%的问题不好,15%的问题很差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书