When the Category of “形(Natural Shape)” Encounters the Concept of “Affordance”: the Illumination on Philosophy of Technology

Dongming Cao, XiaoHui Jiang, JunJie Wu
{"title":"When the Category of “形(Natural Shape)” Encounters the Concept of “Affordance”: the Illumination on Philosophy of Technology","authors":"Dongming Cao, XiaoHui Jiang, JunJie Wu","doi":"10.3724/j.issn.1674-4969.21120601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Chinese philosophy rarely discusses the origin of technology except the phrase “what beyond (natural shape) is Tao ( 道 ), what beneath 形 (natural shape) is (artifacts).” Traditional philosophy uses 形 as a medium and demonstrates the essence and relationship between intangible Tao and visible 器 . However, the philosophy of 形 itself and using it as a connection to Tao and 器 are not explicitly discussed. In the early 20th century, at the human-nature interface, where technology originated, the category “affordance” emerged. Affordance refers to the possibility contained in the environment for action and indicates the complimentary relationship between a living being and its environment, which also manifests profound connotations to 形 . If we assume 形 as the logical starting point to study the origin of technology, technological ethics, and other issue, it is possible to open the dialogue between China and the West about technology by breaking the boundaries of various disciplines and transcending different kinds of philosophical traditions.","PeriodicalId":70314,"journal":{"name":"工程研究-跨学科视野中的工程","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"工程研究-跨学科视野中的工程","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3724/j.issn.1674-4969.21120601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Chinese philosophy rarely discusses the origin of technology except the phrase “what beyond (natural shape) is Tao ( 道 ), what beneath 形 (natural shape) is (artifacts).” Traditional philosophy uses 形 as a medium and demonstrates the essence and relationship between intangible Tao and visible 器 . However, the philosophy of 形 itself and using it as a connection to Tao and 器 are not explicitly discussed. In the early 20th century, at the human-nature interface, where technology originated, the category “affordance” emerged. Affordance refers to the possibility contained in the environment for action and indicates the complimentary relationship between a living being and its environment, which also manifests profound connotations to 形 . If we assume 形 as the logical starting point to study the origin of technology, technological ethics, and other issue, it is possible to open the dialogue between China and the West about technology by breaking the boundaries of various disciplines and transcending different kinds of philosophical traditions.
当“自然形态”范畴遇到“赋能”概念:对技术哲学的启示
中国哲学很少讨论技术的起源,除了“在(自然形态)之上的是道,在(自然形态)之下的是物”。传统哲学以“道”为媒介,展示无形道与有形道的本质与关系。然而,《道》本身的哲学以及将其作为与道和《道》的联系并没有被明确地讨论。20世纪初,在人类与自然的交互界面,也就是科技的发源地,出现了“供给”这个范畴。能动性是指环境中所包含的行动的可能性,是指生物与其环境之间的互补关系,也表现出深刻的内涵。如果我们把“技术”作为研究技术起源、技术伦理等问题的逻辑起点,就有可能突破不同学科的界限,超越不同的哲学传统,开启中西方关于技术的对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
998
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书