Literature Review Using Think Talk Write (TTW) Cooperative Learning Model in Students' Mathematical Reasoning Ability

Evi Widianingrum, Dewi Netta Febrianti, Savitri Wanabuliandari
{"title":"Literature Review Using Think Talk Write (TTW) Cooperative Learning Model in Students' Mathematical Reasoning Ability","authors":"Evi Widianingrum, Dewi Netta Febrianti, Savitri Wanabuliandari","doi":"10.22219/mej.v6i2.22678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research is to analyze Think Talk Write (TTW) learning whether this model is effective in improving students' mathematical reasoning abilities. This type of research is a literature review related to the theory of the Think Talk Write (TTW) type cooperative learning model and mathematical reasoning abilities. This research uses library materials as the main data source that discusses the effectiveness of using cooperative learning models to improve students' mathematical reasoning abilities. The selection of sources from the literature review is chosen according to the development of the journal for the last 5 years, namely 2018 to 2022. Reasoning ability is the ability to draw conclusions or make new statements based on previous statements. For cooperative learning model type Think Talk Write (TTW) is an activity to think about reading material by listening, criticizing, and providing solutions. The results of this study indicate that increasing mathematical reasoning ability is more effective using Think Talk Write (TTW) compared to conventional learning, because the use of Think Talk Write (TTW) type learning model will make students understand the material better because they learn from thinking, compiling, testing. , reflect, and write down ideas.","PeriodicalId":33634,"journal":{"name":"MEJ Mathematics Education Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MEJ Mathematics Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22219/mej.v6i2.22678","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to analyze Think Talk Write (TTW) learning whether this model is effective in improving students' mathematical reasoning abilities. This type of research is a literature review related to the theory of the Think Talk Write (TTW) type cooperative learning model and mathematical reasoning abilities. This research uses library materials as the main data source that discusses the effectiveness of using cooperative learning models to improve students' mathematical reasoning abilities. The selection of sources from the literature review is chosen according to the development of the journal for the last 5 years, namely 2018 to 2022. Reasoning ability is the ability to draw conclusions or make new statements based on previous statements. For cooperative learning model type Think Talk Write (TTW) is an activity to think about reading material by listening, criticizing, and providing solutions. The results of this study indicate that increasing mathematical reasoning ability is more effective using Think Talk Write (TTW) compared to conventional learning, because the use of Think Talk Write (TTW) type learning model will make students understand the material better because they learn from thinking, compiling, testing. , reflect, and write down ideas.
运用“思说写”合作学习模式培养学生数学推理能力的文献综述
本研究的目的是分析思考、说话、写作(TTW)学习模式对提高学生的数学推理能力是否有效。本研究是对“思说写”(TTW)型合作学习模式与数学推理能力相关理论的文献综述。本研究以图书馆资料为主要数据来源,探讨合作学习模式对提高学生数学推理能力的有效性。文献综述的来源选择是根据期刊近5年,即2018 - 2022年的发展情况来选择的。推理能力是根据先前的陈述得出结论或作出新的陈述的能力。对于合作学习模式来说,思考、说话、写作(TTW)是一种通过听、批评和提供解决方案来思考阅读材料的活动。本研究结果表明,与传统的学习方式相比,采用“思说写”(Think Talk Write,简称TTW)学习方式能更有效地提高数学推理能力,因为使用“思说写”(简称TTW)学习模式会使学生更好地理解材料,因为他们是通过思考、编写、测试来学习的。反思,写下你的想法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信