Addressing Transition to Practice: Assessing Perceived Effectiveness of a Competency Based Change to On-Call Responsibilities of Senior Cardiology Residents

A. Caddell, Edwin Moses Bamwoya, Andrew D. Moeller
{"title":"Addressing Transition to Practice: Assessing Perceived Effectiveness of a Competency Based Change to On-Call Responsibilities of Senior Cardiology Residents","authors":"A. Caddell, Edwin Moses Bamwoya, Andrew D. Moeller","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-984152/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Background\n\nThere has been a paradigm shift in residency training over the last several years wherein Competency by Design (CBD) is being integrated to replace more traditional time-based models of training. The Residency Program Committee (RPC) for the Cardiology training program at Dalhousie University in Halifax, Canada addressed the Transition to Practice stage by approving a trial of adjusting the resident call responsibilities to reflect the transition to CBD curriculum. The goal of this adjustment was three-fold: i. Gradually increase accountability of the senior cardiology resident as they transition to practice; ii. Address a gap in training that allows the senior resident to have a gradual transition to the role of a practicing cardiologist while on call; iii. Allows further evolution of skills and abilities.\nMethods\n\nA survey was administered to the practitioners involved in this competency-based change to the call responsibilities. Surveys were distributed to the final year Cardiology Residents, Staff Cardiologists, and Senior Internal Medicine residents to assess their experience and opinions of the current, competency-based change of the on-call curriculum. The survey consisted of eleven questions, of which, four were assessed on a Likert scale and 3 were yes/no questions.\nResults\n\nFour PGY6 cardiology residents, five senior internal medicine residents and eleven staff cardiologists completed the survey. Amongst those who completed the survey there was agreement that the change to the on-call responsibilities improved cardiology residents’ skills, accountability and preparedness to practice. All groups felt the changes were useful for the cardiology training program. There was mild negative effect of perceived accountability by the internal medicine residents.\nConclusion\n\nOverall the change in call structure led to improved perceived preparedness to practice amongst the cardiology residents and addressed a gap in the Transition to Practice phase of CBD training. This study provides some evidence to the potential benefit of CBD and specifically in the benefits towards transitioning to practice.","PeriodicalId":72523,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology and cardiovascular medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology and cardiovascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-984152/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background There has been a paradigm shift in residency training over the last several years wherein Competency by Design (CBD) is being integrated to replace more traditional time-based models of training. The Residency Program Committee (RPC) for the Cardiology training program at Dalhousie University in Halifax, Canada addressed the Transition to Practice stage by approving a trial of adjusting the resident call responsibilities to reflect the transition to CBD curriculum. The goal of this adjustment was three-fold: i. Gradually increase accountability of the senior cardiology resident as they transition to practice; ii. Address a gap in training that allows the senior resident to have a gradual transition to the role of a practicing cardiologist while on call; iii. Allows further evolution of skills and abilities. Methods A survey was administered to the practitioners involved in this competency-based change to the call responsibilities. Surveys were distributed to the final year Cardiology Residents, Staff Cardiologists, and Senior Internal Medicine residents to assess their experience and opinions of the current, competency-based change of the on-call curriculum. The survey consisted of eleven questions, of which, four were assessed on a Likert scale and 3 were yes/no questions. Results Four PGY6 cardiology residents, five senior internal medicine residents and eleven staff cardiologists completed the survey. Amongst those who completed the survey there was agreement that the change to the on-call responsibilities improved cardiology residents’ skills, accountability and preparedness to practice. All groups felt the changes were useful for the cardiology training program. There was mild negative effect of perceived accountability by the internal medicine residents. Conclusion Overall the change in call structure led to improved perceived preparedness to practice amongst the cardiology residents and addressed a gap in the Transition to Practice phase of CBD training. This study provides some evidence to the potential benefit of CBD and specifically in the benefits towards transitioning to practice.
应对向实践的转变:评估基于能力的老年心脏病学住院医师随叫随到职责转变的感知有效性
在过去的几年里,住院医师培训的模式发生了转变,设计能力(CBD)正在被整合,以取代传统的基于时间的培训模式。加拿大哈利法克斯达尔豪斯大学心脏病学培训项目的住院医师计划委员会(RPC)通过批准调整住院医师call职责的试验,以反映向CBD课程的过渡,解决了向实践阶段的过渡。这一调整的目标有三个方面:1 .逐渐增加老年心脏病住院医师的责任,因为他们过渡到实践;2解决培训上的差距,使高级住院医师能够在随叫随到的情况下逐步过渡到执业心脏病专家的角色;3允许技能和能力的进一步发展。方法对参与这一基于能力的呼叫责任变更的从业人员进行调查。调查被分发给最后一年的心脏病住院医师、工作人员心脏病专家和高级内科住院医师,以评估他们对当前基于能力的随叫随到课程变化的经验和意见。该调查包括11个问题,其中4个用李克特量表进行评估,3个是/否问题。结果4名PGY6心脏科住院医师、5名高级内科住院医师和11名工作人员心脏科医师完成调查。在那些完成调查的人中,有一个共识,即值班责任的改变提高了心脏病学住院医生的技能,问责制和实践准备。所有的小组都认为这些改变对心脏病学培训项目是有用的。内科住院医师的问责感有轻微的负向影响。总体而言,呼叫结构的变化导致心脏病学住院医师对实践的感知准备得到改善,并解决了CBD培训过渡到实践阶段的差距。这项研究为CBD的潜在益处提供了一些证据,特别是在向实践过渡的益处方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信