The role of tutor's questioning in mentoring learners' responses to and uptake of feedback on writing

Q1 Arts and Humanities
M. Saeed, A. O. AbuSa’aleek, Huda Suleiman Al Qunayeer
{"title":"The role of tutor's questioning in mentoring learners' responses to and uptake of feedback on writing","authors":"M. Saeed, A. O. AbuSa’aleek, Huda Suleiman Al Qunayeer","doi":"10.17509/ijal.v11i3.34600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How teachers can provide effective feedback that promotes' students' active responses to and use of it is the question of the current debate in research. The need for teachers to formulate/compose their feedback in the form of questioning alleviates their authoritative roles in the process. Therefore, this study explored the role of teacher Google Doc-based feedback given in the form of questions on the assignments of 14 pairs of undergraduates in a Malaysian university in fostering their responses to feedback and uptake of it in writing. The results revealed that the feedback questions fall into single Yes/No questions, single Wh-questions, and a combination of both, which served as eliciting responses, eliciting information, seeking clarifications, requesting, checking certainty, and inviting learners to respond to and interact over the e-feedback before using it in revising their texts. Findings indicate that Google Docs functions as an interactive platform where students diversify their responses to e-feedback, such as commenting on the e-feedback, interacting around the e-feedback issues, seeking further feedback, resolving the e-feedback, and addressing the e-feedback through edits/text revisions. Furthermore, the way e-feedback questioning is formulated influences how students respond to and use e-feedback in revising their assignments. The study provides valuable suggestions for teacher feedback practices in graduate courses in higher educational institutions.","PeriodicalId":38082,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v11i3.34600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How teachers can provide effective feedback that promotes' students' active responses to and use of it is the question of the current debate in research. The need for teachers to formulate/compose their feedback in the form of questioning alleviates their authoritative roles in the process. Therefore, this study explored the role of teacher Google Doc-based feedback given in the form of questions on the assignments of 14 pairs of undergraduates in a Malaysian university in fostering their responses to feedback and uptake of it in writing. The results revealed that the feedback questions fall into single Yes/No questions, single Wh-questions, and a combination of both, which served as eliciting responses, eliciting information, seeking clarifications, requesting, checking certainty, and inviting learners to respond to and interact over the e-feedback before using it in revising their texts. Findings indicate that Google Docs functions as an interactive platform where students diversify their responses to e-feedback, such as commenting on the e-feedback, interacting around the e-feedback issues, seeking further feedback, resolving the e-feedback, and addressing the e-feedback through edits/text revisions. Furthermore, the way e-feedback questioning is formulated influences how students respond to and use e-feedback in revising their assignments. The study provides valuable suggestions for teacher feedback practices in graduate courses in higher educational institutions.
导师提问在指导学习者对写作反馈的反应和吸收中的作用
教师如何提供有效的反馈,以促进“学生”对其的积极反应和使用,是目前研究中争论的问题。教师需要以提问的形式制定/撰写反馈,这减轻了他们在这个过程中的权威角色。因此,本研究探讨了教师谷歌doc为基础的反馈,以问题的形式给予14对马来西亚大学的本科生的作业,在培养他们的反应反馈和吸收它的书面。结果表明,反馈问题分为单一的“是/否”问题、单一的“是/否”问题以及两者的组合,这些问题起到了引出回应、引出信息、寻求澄清、请求、检查确定性以及邀请学习者在使用电子反馈进行修改文本之前对其进行回应和互动的作用。研究结果表明,谷歌Docs是一个互动平台,学生可以在这里对电子反馈进行多样化的回应,例如评论电子反馈,围绕电子反馈问题进行互动,寻求进一步的反馈,解决电子反馈,并通过编辑/文本修订来解决电子反馈。此外,电子反馈问题的制定方式影响学生在修改作业时如何回应和使用电子反馈。本研究为高校研究生课程教师反馈实践提供了有价值的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics
Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of this Journal is to promote a principled approach to research on language and language-related concerns by encouraging enquiry into relationship between theoretical and practical studies. The journal welcomes contributions in such areas of current analysis in: first, second, and foreign language teaching and learning; language in education; language planning, language testing; curriculum design and development; multilingualism and multilingual education; discourse analysis; translation; clinical linguistics; literature and teaching; and. forensic linguistics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信