Book Review: Labor in the Age of Finance: Pensions, Politics, and Corporations from Deindustrialization to Dodd-Frank by Jacoby, Sanford M

Q2 Arts and Humanities
R. Bruno
{"title":"Book Review: Labor in the Age of Finance: Pensions, Politics, and Corporations from Deindustrialization to Dodd-Frank by Jacoby, Sanford M","authors":"R. Bruno","doi":"10.1177/0160449x231169236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"number of participants who registered as unemployed was deceptively high. Participants were more willing than their counterparts to use public welfare supports while transitioning to the labor force, but the time it took to transition was shorter for participants. One of Jelonek’s more interesting, and less surprising, discoveries is that despite the high student demand for streams which provided signals to employers, follow-up surveys discovered that participants actually found the less tangible competence streams much more useful in their careers. The detailed examination of the theoretical framework and methodological limitations of the CDP make Universities and the Labour Market a valuable tool for building programs designed to help students transition to work after graduating. Her detailed discussion of the sampling techniques used to assess the validity of the CDP should be of particular interest to policy researchers. Jelonek lays the groundwork for a jumping-off point to assess university-based supports for competence development or co-op courses. Understanding that support programs such as CDP are not short-term solutions, and that such programs should aim to develop a broad range of competences, will help those who are developing department-wide employment initiatives.","PeriodicalId":35267,"journal":{"name":"Labor Studies Journal","volume":"48 1","pages":"214 - 216"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labor Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0160449x231169236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

number of participants who registered as unemployed was deceptively high. Participants were more willing than their counterparts to use public welfare supports while transitioning to the labor force, but the time it took to transition was shorter for participants. One of Jelonek’s more interesting, and less surprising, discoveries is that despite the high student demand for streams which provided signals to employers, follow-up surveys discovered that participants actually found the less tangible competence streams much more useful in their careers. The detailed examination of the theoretical framework and methodological limitations of the CDP make Universities and the Labour Market a valuable tool for building programs designed to help students transition to work after graduating. Her detailed discussion of the sampling techniques used to assess the validity of the CDP should be of particular interest to policy researchers. Jelonek lays the groundwork for a jumping-off point to assess university-based supports for competence development or co-op courses. Understanding that support programs such as CDP are not short-term solutions, and that such programs should aim to develop a broad range of competences, will help those who are developing department-wide employment initiatives.
书评:《金融时代的劳工:从去工业化到多德-弗兰克的养老金、政治和公司》,作者:Jacoby,Sanford M
登记失业的参与者人数高得令人难以置信。参与者比他们的同行更愿意在过渡到劳动力队伍时使用公共福利支持,但参与者过渡所需的时间更短。杰洛内克的一个更有趣、也不那么令人惊讶的发现是,尽管学生对流的需求很高,这为雇主提供了信号,但后续调查发现,参与者实际上发现,不太明显的能力流在他们的职业生涯中更有用。对CDP的理论框架和方法局限性的详细审查使大学和劳动力市场成为建立旨在帮助学生毕业后过渡到工作岗位的项目的宝贵工具。她对用于评估CDP有效性的抽样技术的详细讨论应该引起政策研究人员的特别兴趣。Jelonek为评估大学对能力发展或合作课程的支持奠定了基础。了解CDP等支持计划不是短期解决方案,并且此类计划应旨在培养广泛的能力,这将有助于那些正在制定部门范围就业计划的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Labor Studies Journal
Labor Studies Journal Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The Labor Studies Journal is the official journal of the United Association for Labor Education and is a multi-disciplinary journal publishing research on work, workers, labor organizations, and labor studies and worker education in the US and internationally. The Journal is interested in manuscripts using a diversity of research methods, both qualitative and quantitative, directed at a general audience including union, university, and community based labor educators, labor activists and scholars from across the social sciences and humanities. As a multi-disciplinary journal, manuscripts should be directed at a general audience, and care should be taken to make methods, especially highly quantitative ones, accessible to a general reader.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信