A Policy of Potential Problems: the Buffering Effects of the Perceptions of Pay Secrecy and Cynicism on Workplace Ostracism.

IF 2.3 Q3 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
Matthew J Aplin-Houtz, Mark Sanders, Emily K Lane
{"title":"A Policy of Potential Problems: the Buffering Effects of the Perceptions of Pay Secrecy and Cynicism on Workplace Ostracism.","authors":"Matthew J Aplin-Houtz, Mark Sanders, Emily K Lane","doi":"10.1007/s10672-022-09425-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the unstable work environment brought about by high levels of turnover and employee burnout, many firms have sought fresh human capital to fill critical roles. The strain of having to complete job duties in an understaffed environment made remaining employees feel as though they are not being paid enough to do more work for the same pay. However, incoming workers required higher wages to match market demands. Owing to the existence of pay secrecy policies having the potential of making existing workers feel ostracized because elements of seniority, loyalty, and distrust of their employers, a cycle of cynicism and deeper senses of ostracism likely are occurring. With the support of the literature surrounding workplace ostracism, pay secrecy policies, and cynicism, we sampled general workers in the United States (n = 372) to determine if cynicism had the potential to further impact the negative relationship of perceptions of pay secrecy policies and workplace ostracism. Our findings suggest cynicism moderates the proposed relationship at average and high levels indicating that cynicism will buffer feelings of ostracism in an environment where there are negative perceptions of pay secrecy. We discuss how our findings add to the literature through being the first study to explore our hypothesized relationship. Furthermore, we add to understanding of how the aging workforce likely is experiencing cynicism and ostracism associated with pay secrecy policies. Beyond discussing our findings, we give suggestions for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":45566,"journal":{"name":"Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-26"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9549435/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-022-09425-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the unstable work environment brought about by high levels of turnover and employee burnout, many firms have sought fresh human capital to fill critical roles. The strain of having to complete job duties in an understaffed environment made remaining employees feel as though they are not being paid enough to do more work for the same pay. However, incoming workers required higher wages to match market demands. Owing to the existence of pay secrecy policies having the potential of making existing workers feel ostracized because elements of seniority, loyalty, and distrust of their employers, a cycle of cynicism and deeper senses of ostracism likely are occurring. With the support of the literature surrounding workplace ostracism, pay secrecy policies, and cynicism, we sampled general workers in the United States (n = 372) to determine if cynicism had the potential to further impact the negative relationship of perceptions of pay secrecy policies and workplace ostracism. Our findings suggest cynicism moderates the proposed relationship at average and high levels indicating that cynicism will buffer feelings of ostracism in an environment where there are negative perceptions of pay secrecy. We discuss how our findings add to the literature through being the first study to explore our hypothesized relationship. Furthermore, we add to understanding of how the aging workforce likely is experiencing cynicism and ostracism associated with pay secrecy policies. Beyond discussing our findings, we give suggestions for future research.

一种潜在问题的政策:薪酬保密和犬儒主义对职场排斥的缓冲作用
由于高流动率和员工倦怠所带来的不稳定的工作环境,许多公司都在寻求新的人力资本来填补关键角色。在人手不足的环境中完成工作职责的压力让剩下的员工觉得,他们没有得到足够的报酬,不能以同样的工资做更多的工作。然而,新来的工人需要更高的工资来满足市场需求。由于薪酬保密政策的存在,由于资历、忠诚度和对雇主的不信任等因素,有可能使现有的工人感到被排斥,因此可能会出现一种玩世不恭和更深层次的排斥感的循环。在有关工作场所排斥、薪酬保密政策和玩世不恭的文献支持下,我们以美国的普通工人为样本(n = 372),以确定玩世不恭是否有可能进一步影响对薪酬保密政策和工作场所排斥的负面关系。我们的研究结果表明,玩世不恭在平均水平和高水平上调节了所提出的关系,这表明玩世不恭将缓冲在对薪酬保密有负面看法的环境中被排斥的感觉。我们讨论了我们的发现如何通过首次探索我们假设的关系来增加文献。此外,我们增加了对老龄化劳动力如何可能经历与薪酬保密政策相关的玩世不恭和排斥的理解。除了讨论我们的发现之外,我们还对未来的研究提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal fosters development of the field of employee relations by presenting high-quality, peer-reviewed original research articles and by linking practitioner concerns involving the employment relationship with academic rigor. The journal is interdisciplinary in focus, drawing from a broad range of disciplines including ethics, organizational behavior, law, economics, sociology, social psychology, industrial and employment relations, administrative and organizational studies, and philosophy to further the understanding of both employee responsibilities and rights. The journal offers an international forum for the publication of scholarly peer-reviewed original research including qualitative and quantitative empirical studies, case studies, critical commentaries, and conceptual and dialectic presentations. In addition, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal publishes a Perspectives Section that showcases important contributions in formats other than the traditional research article. Such contributions include symposia/roundtable discussions, commentaries, review essays, interviews, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书