No evidence for differential saccadic adaptation in children and adults with an Autism Spectrum diagnosis.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
K. Tarrit, E. Freedman, A. Francisco, D. J. Horsthuis, S. Molholm, John J. Foxe
{"title":"No evidence for differential saccadic adaptation in children and adults with an Autism Spectrum diagnosis.","authors":"K. Tarrit, E. Freedman, A. Francisco, D. J. Horsthuis, S. Molholm, John J. Foxe","doi":"10.1101/2023.05.31.23290682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Differential eye-movements during scene exploration, and gaze preferences in social settings, have long been noted as features of the Autism phenotype. While these are typically attributed to differences in social engagement and interests (e.g., preferences for inanimate objects over face stimuli), there are also reports of differential saccade measures to non-social stimuli, raising the possibility that fundamental differences in visuo-sensorimotor processing may be at play. Here, we tested the plasticity of the eye-movement system using a classic saccade-adaptation paradigm to assess whether individuals with ASD make typical adjustments to their eye-movements in response to experimentally introduced errors. Saccade adaptation can be measured in infants as young as 10 months, raising the possibility that such measures could be useful as early neuromarkers of ASD risk. Methods: Saccade amplitudes were measured while children and adults with ASD (N=41) and age-matched typically developing (TD) individuals (N=68) made rapid eye-movements to peripherally presented (20-degrees) targets. During adaptation trials, the target was relocated to 15-degrees from fixation once a saccade to the original target location was initiated, a manipulation that leads to systematic reduction in saccade amplitudes in typical observers. Results: Neither children nor adults with ASD showed any differences relative to TD peers in their abilities to appropriately adapt saccades in the face of persistently introduced errors. Conclusions: Of the three studies to date of saccade adaptation in ASD, none have shown frank deficits in saccade adaptation. Unlike prior studies, we found no evidence for a slower adaptation rate during the early adaptation phase, and no evidence greater variance of saccade amplitudes in ASD. In post-hoc analysis, there was evidence for larger primary saccades to non-adapted targets, a finding requiring replication in future work.","PeriodicalId":56016,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.31.23290682","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Differential eye-movements during scene exploration, and gaze preferences in social settings, have long been noted as features of the Autism phenotype. While these are typically attributed to differences in social engagement and interests (e.g., preferences for inanimate objects over face stimuli), there are also reports of differential saccade measures to non-social stimuli, raising the possibility that fundamental differences in visuo-sensorimotor processing may be at play. Here, we tested the plasticity of the eye-movement system using a classic saccade-adaptation paradigm to assess whether individuals with ASD make typical adjustments to their eye-movements in response to experimentally introduced errors. Saccade adaptation can be measured in infants as young as 10 months, raising the possibility that such measures could be useful as early neuromarkers of ASD risk. Methods: Saccade amplitudes were measured while children and adults with ASD (N=41) and age-matched typically developing (TD) individuals (N=68) made rapid eye-movements to peripherally presented (20-degrees) targets. During adaptation trials, the target was relocated to 15-degrees from fixation once a saccade to the original target location was initiated, a manipulation that leads to systematic reduction in saccade amplitudes in typical observers. Results: Neither children nor adults with ASD showed any differences relative to TD peers in their abilities to appropriately adapt saccades in the face of persistently introduced errors. Conclusions: Of the three studies to date of saccade adaptation in ASD, none have shown frank deficits in saccade adaptation. Unlike prior studies, we found no evidence for a slower adaptation rate during the early adaptation phase, and no evidence greater variance of saccade amplitudes in ASD. In post-hoc analysis, there was evidence for larger primary saccades to non-adapted targets, a finding requiring replication in future work.
没有证据表明自闭症谱系诊断的儿童和成人有不同的扫视适应。
背景:在场景探索过程中的不同眼球运动,以及在社交环境中的凝视偏好,一直被认为是自闭症表型的特征。虽然这些通常归因于社会参与和兴趣的差异(例如,对无生命物体的偏好超过对面部刺激的偏好),但也有报道称,对非社会刺激的扫视测量存在差异,这提出了视觉-感觉运动处理的根本差异可能在起作用。在这里,我们使用经典的眼跳适应范式来测试眼球运动系统的可塑性,以评估自闭症患者是否会对实验引入的错误做出典型的眼球运动调整。眼跳适应可以在10个月大的婴儿中测量,这增加了这种测量可能作为ASD风险的早期神经标志物的可能性。方法:测量ASD儿童、成人(N=41)和年龄匹配的典型发育(TD)个体(N=68)对周围呈现(20度)目标进行快速眼动时的眼跳振幅。在适应试验中,一旦开始扫视到原始目标位置,目标就被重新定位到距固定15度的位置,这种操作导致典型观察者的扫视幅度系统性降低。结果:在面对持续引入的错误时,ASD儿童和成人在适当适应扫视的能力方面与TD同龄人没有任何差异。结论:在迄今为止的三项关于ASD的扫视适应的研究中,没有一项显示出扫视适应的明显缺陷。与之前的研究不同,我们没有发现在早期适应阶段适应速度较慢的证据,也没有发现ASD中扫视幅度差异较大的证据。在事后分析中,有证据表明对非适应目标有更大的初级扫视,这一发现需要在未来的工作中重复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience Neuroscience-Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
148
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research that synthesizes multiple facets of brain structure and function, to better understand how multiple diverse functions are integrated to produce complex behaviors. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. Our goal is to publish research related to furthering the understanding of the integrative mechanisms underlying brain functioning across one or more interacting levels of neural organization. In most real life experiences, sensory inputs from several modalities converge and interact in a manner that influences perception and actions generating purposeful and social behaviors. The journal is therefore focused on the primary questions of how multiple sensory, cognitive and emotional processes merge to produce coordinated complex behavior. It is questions such as this that cannot be answered at a single level – an ion channel, a neuron or a synapse – that we wish to focus on. In Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience we welcome in vitro or in vivo investigations across the molecular, cellular, and systems and behavioral level. Research in any species and at any stage of development and aging that are focused at understanding integration mechanisms underlying emergent properties of the brain and behavior are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信