Characteristics of office workers who benefit most from interventions for preventing neck and low back pain: a moderation analysis

IF 3.4 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Nipaporn Akkarakittichoke, M. Jensen, A. Newman, Pooriput Waongenngarm, Prawit Janwantanakul
{"title":"Characteristics of office workers who benefit most from interventions for preventing neck and low back pain: a moderation analysis","authors":"Nipaporn Akkarakittichoke, M. Jensen, A. Newman, Pooriput Waongenngarm, Prawit Janwantanakul","doi":"10.1097/PR9.0000000000001014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Number of working hours, work-related psychological demands, and use of lumbar support moderate the beneficial effects of preventive interventions for neck and low back pain. Abstract Introduction: Neck and low back pain are significant health problem in sedentary office workers. Active break and postural shift interventions has been proved to reduce the incidence of new onset of both neck and low back pain. Objectives: To identify variables that moderate the effects of active breaks and postural shift interventions on the development of neck and low back pain in office workers. Methods: Using data from a 3-arm (active break, postural shift, and control group) cluster randomized controlled trial (N = 193), we evaluated the moderating effects of age, job position, education level, sex, perceived psychological work demands, number of working hours, and using a chair with lumbar support on the benefits of 2 interventions designed to prevent the development of neck and low back pain in office workers. Moderation analyses were conducted using the Hayes PROCESS macro, with post hoc Johnson–Neyman techniques and logistic regressions. Results: Significant interactions between intervention groups and 3 moderators assessed at baseline emerged. For the prevention of neck pain, the effect of the active break intervention was moderated by the number of working hours and the effect of the postural shift intervention was moderated by the level of perceived psychological work demands and the number of working hours. For the prevention of low back pain, the effect of postural shift intervention was moderated by having or not having a chair with lumbar support. Conclusions: The study findings can be used to help determine who might benefit the most from 2 treatments that can reduce the risk of developing neck and low back pain in sedentary workers and may also help us to understand the mechanisms underlying the benefits of these interventions.","PeriodicalId":52189,"journal":{"name":"Pain Reports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000001014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Number of working hours, work-related psychological demands, and use of lumbar support moderate the beneficial effects of preventive interventions for neck and low back pain. Abstract Introduction: Neck and low back pain are significant health problem in sedentary office workers. Active break and postural shift interventions has been proved to reduce the incidence of new onset of both neck and low back pain. Objectives: To identify variables that moderate the effects of active breaks and postural shift interventions on the development of neck and low back pain in office workers. Methods: Using data from a 3-arm (active break, postural shift, and control group) cluster randomized controlled trial (N = 193), we evaluated the moderating effects of age, job position, education level, sex, perceived psychological work demands, number of working hours, and using a chair with lumbar support on the benefits of 2 interventions designed to prevent the development of neck and low back pain in office workers. Moderation analyses were conducted using the Hayes PROCESS macro, with post hoc Johnson–Neyman techniques and logistic regressions. Results: Significant interactions between intervention groups and 3 moderators assessed at baseline emerged. For the prevention of neck pain, the effect of the active break intervention was moderated by the number of working hours and the effect of the postural shift intervention was moderated by the level of perceived psychological work demands and the number of working hours. For the prevention of low back pain, the effect of postural shift intervention was moderated by having or not having a chair with lumbar support. Conclusions: The study findings can be used to help determine who might benefit the most from 2 treatments that can reduce the risk of developing neck and low back pain in sedentary workers and may also help us to understand the mechanisms underlying the benefits of these interventions.
从预防颈部和腰痛的干预措施中获益最多的办公室职员的特征:一项适度分析
工作时间、与工作相关的心理需求和腰部支撑的使用调节了预防性干预措施对颈部和腰痛的有益效果。摘要简介:颈部和腰痛是久坐不动的上班族的主要健康问题。积极的休息和体位转换干预已被证明可以降低新发颈部和腰痛的发生率。目的:确定调节主动休息和姿势转换干预对上班族颈部和腰痛发展的影响的变量。方法:使用来自3臂(主动休息、姿势转换和对照组)集群随机对照试验(N=193)的数据,我们评估了年龄、工作岗位、教育水平、性别、感知的心理工作需求、工作时间、,以及使用带腰部支撑的椅子对两种干预措施的益处,这些干预措施旨在防止上班族出现颈部和腰痛。使用Hayes PROCESS宏、事后Johnson–Neyman技术和逻辑回归进行了适度分析。结果:干预组和基线评估的3名调节者之间出现了显著的相互作用。为了预防颈部疼痛,主动休息干预的效果受工作小时数的调节,姿势转换干预的效果由感知的心理工作需求水平和工作小时数调节。为了预防腰痛,通过使用或不使用带腰部支撑的椅子来调节体位转换干预的效果。结论:研究结果可用于帮助确定谁可能从两种治疗中受益最大,这两种治疗可以降低久坐工人患颈部和腰痛的风险,也可能有助于我们了解这些干预措施益处的潜在机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Reports
Pain Reports Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信