Exploring private water wells for fecal sources and evidence of pathogen presence in the context of current testing practices for potability in Ontario

IF 2.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 WATER RESOURCES
Sophie Felleiter, K. Mcdermott, Geof Hall, P. Sheth, A. Majury
{"title":"Exploring private water wells for fecal sources and evidence of pathogen presence in the context of current testing practices for potability in Ontario","authors":"Sophie Felleiter, K. Mcdermott, Geof Hall, P. Sheth, A. Majury","doi":"10.2166/WQRJ.2019.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Private water wells provide drinking water for an estimated 4.1 million households in Canada yet remain understudied in the context of microbial water quality or human health impacts. As there exists little systematic surveillance for enteric infections or outbreaks related to well water sources, consumers may be at risk of waterborne infectious diseases. A standard protocol in Ontario requires 200 mL of water, collected, and submitted by well owners, half of which is used to analyze for Escherichia coli and total coliforms (TCs). The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of testing small water volumes and to survey for other contaminants in addition to bacterial indicators to inform pathogen prevalence and fecal source in drinking water wells. Samples were assessed for E. coli and TCs, by culture, and genetic markers of Bacteroides spp., Campylobacter spp., Salmonella spp., and Shiga toxin-producing E. coli, using qPCR. The source of fecal contamination varied by the geographic region and may be explained by septic tank density and underlying geology, among other factors. A small number of samples (1.9%) showed the evidence of contamination with enteric pathogens. Lastly, E. coli measured by qPCR, as opposed to culture, correlated more strongly to Bacteroides markers.","PeriodicalId":23720,"journal":{"name":"Water Quality Research Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2166/WQRJ.2019.035","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Quality Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/WQRJ.2019.035","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Private water wells provide drinking water for an estimated 4.1 million households in Canada yet remain understudied in the context of microbial water quality or human health impacts. As there exists little systematic surveillance for enteric infections or outbreaks related to well water sources, consumers may be at risk of waterborne infectious diseases. A standard protocol in Ontario requires 200 mL of water, collected, and submitted by well owners, half of which is used to analyze for Escherichia coli and total coliforms (TCs). The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of testing small water volumes and to survey for other contaminants in addition to bacterial indicators to inform pathogen prevalence and fecal source in drinking water wells. Samples were assessed for E. coli and TCs, by culture, and genetic markers of Bacteroides spp., Campylobacter spp., Salmonella spp., and Shiga toxin-producing E. coli, using qPCR. The source of fecal contamination varied by the geographic region and may be explained by septic tank density and underlying geology, among other factors. A small number of samples (1.9%) showed the evidence of contamination with enteric pathogens. Lastly, E. coli measured by qPCR, as opposed to culture, correlated more strongly to Bacteroides markers.
在目前安大略省饮用水测试实践的背景下,探索私人水井的粪便来源和病原体存在的证据
私人水井为加拿大约410万户家庭提供饮用水,但在微生物水质或人类健康影响方面仍然研究不足。由于对与井水水源有关的肠道感染或疫情几乎没有系统的监测,消费者可能面临水传播传染病的风险。安大略省的一项标准方案需要200毫升水,由油井所有者收集并提交,其中一半用于分析大肠杆菌和总大肠菌群(TC)。本研究的目的是确定小水量测试的有效性,并调查除细菌指标外的其他污染物,以了解饮用水井中的病原体流行率和粪便来源。使用qPCR,通过培养和拟杆菌属、弯曲杆菌属、沙门氏菌属和产志贺毒素大肠杆菌的遗传标记来评估样品的大肠杆菌和TC。粪便污染的来源因地理区域而异,可以通过化粪池密度和潜在地质等因素来解释。少数样本(1.9%)显示有肠道病原体污染的证据。最后,与培养相比,通过qPCR测量的大肠杆菌与拟杆菌标志物的相关性更强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.70%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信