電子檔案風險評估指標之建構及其應用實例分析 Establishing the Risk Assessment Indicators of Electronic Records and Empirical Analysis of an Institution

IF 0.2 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
林巧敏 Chiao-Min Lin
{"title":"電子檔案風險評估指標之建構及其應用實例分析 Establishing the Risk Assessment Indicators of Electronic Records and Empirical Analysis of an Institution","authors":"林巧敏 Chiao-Min Lin","doi":"10.6182/JLIS.202006_18(1).069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to construct a risk management model of electronic records in accordance with archival appraisal elements and the theoretical framework of risk management. The Delphi method was taken to generalize the expert consensus of electronic record risks, which can provide the basis for archival agencies to self-check their risk factors. In addition, considering the feasibility of promoting into practical, this study implemented an empirical case study to recommend a risk classification structure. The complete mode of electronic records risk management, according on the base of case study, was including of risk identification, risk assessment and implement strategy were addressed. The result proposed 63 risk indicators for agencies to carry out electronic records risk assessment. The study applied the risk assessment checklist to conduct risk identification and assessment surveys of individual cases, most of which fell in low risk areas. According to the risk management theory, the risk management strategy of electronic records was proposed. For risk indicators with risk values between 3 and 4, it was recommended to adopt a prevention strategy, risk indicators with a risk value of 4 or higher, and adopted a prevention and mitigation strategy to deal with them. Finally, the risk management framework of electronic records was proposed. The contribution of this study was to accomplish a risk checklist and set up the practice assessment model for the archival agencies as a reference to put risk management into practice.Keywords: Risk Assessment; Archives Authenticity; Archives Integrity; Archives Accessibility; Electronic Records Management \n【摘要】本研究目的在於建立符合國內機關檔案情境之電子檔案風險管理作業模式。採用疊慧法(Delphi)評核電子檔案風險管理之共識項目,建立機關檔案進行電子檔案風險自我檢核的指標,接續進行個案實證研究,以驗證風險檢核表之適用性,進而提出個案機關之電子檔案風險管理策略。本研究調查結果提出63項電子檔案風險檢核指標,可供機關進行風險評估作業運用;完成個案機關風險辨識與評估作業後,呈現多數指標落於低度風險區;根據風險評估結果,對於風險值3到4的指標,提供預防策略建議,對於風險值4以上指標,提供預防及減輕策略加以因應。本研究提出之電子檔案風險管理檢核表以及實務評估作業模式,可供各機關進行電子檔案風險管理實務操作之參考。關鍵字:風險評估、檔案真實性、檔案完整性、檔案可及性、電子檔案管理","PeriodicalId":40348,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Library and Information Studies","volume":"18 1","pages":"69-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Library and Information Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6182/JLIS.202006_18(1).069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to construct a risk management model of electronic records in accordance with archival appraisal elements and the theoretical framework of risk management. The Delphi method was taken to generalize the expert consensus of electronic record risks, which can provide the basis for archival agencies to self-check their risk factors. In addition, considering the feasibility of promoting into practical, this study implemented an empirical case study to recommend a risk classification structure. The complete mode of electronic records risk management, according on the base of case study, was including of risk identification, risk assessment and implement strategy were addressed. The result proposed 63 risk indicators for agencies to carry out electronic records risk assessment. The study applied the risk assessment checklist to conduct risk identification and assessment surveys of individual cases, most of which fell in low risk areas. According to the risk management theory, the risk management strategy of electronic records was proposed. For risk indicators with risk values between 3 and 4, it was recommended to adopt a prevention strategy, risk indicators with a risk value of 4 or higher, and adopted a prevention and mitigation strategy to deal with them. Finally, the risk management framework of electronic records was proposed. The contribution of this study was to accomplish a risk checklist and set up the practice assessment model for the archival agencies as a reference to put risk management into practice.Keywords: Risk Assessment; Archives Authenticity; Archives Integrity; Archives Accessibility; Electronic Records Management 【摘要】本研究目的在於建立符合國內機關檔案情境之電子檔案風險管理作業模式。採用疊慧法(Delphi)評核電子檔案風險管理之共識項目,建立機關檔案進行電子檔案風險自我檢核的指標,接續進行個案實證研究,以驗證風險檢核表之適用性,進而提出個案機關之電子檔案風險管理策略。本研究調查結果提出63項電子檔案風險檢核指標,可供機關進行風險評估作業運用;完成個案機關風險辨識與評估作業後,呈現多數指標落於低度風險區;根據風險評估結果,對於風險值3到4的指標,提供預防策略建議,對於風險值4以上指標,提供預防及減輕策略加以因應。本研究提出之電子檔案風險管理檢核表以及實務評估作業模式,可供各機關進行電子檔案風險管理實務操作之參考。關鍵字:風險評估、檔案真實性、檔案完整性、檔案可及性、電子檔案管理
电子档案风险评估指标之建构及其应用实例分析 Establishing the Risk Assessment Indicators of Electronic Records and Empirical Analysis of an Institution
本研究的目的是根据档案评估要素和风险管理理论框架,构建电子档案风险管理模型。采用德尔菲法对电子档案风险的专家共识进行归纳,为档案机构进行风险因素自查提供依据。此外,考虑到推广的可行性,本研究实施了实证案例研究,推荐了风险分类结构。在案例分析的基础上,探讨了电子档案风险管理的完整模式,包括风险识别、风险评估和实施策略。研究结果提出了63项机构开展电子档案风险评估的风险指标。本研究采用风险评估清单对个案进行风险识别和评估调查,其中大部分个案落在低风险区域。根据风险管理理论,提出了电子档案的风险管理策略。对于风险值在3至4之间的风险指标,建议采用预防战略,风险值在4或更高的风险指标,并采用预防和缓解战略来处理它们。最后,提出了电子档案风险管理框架。本研究的贡献在于建立档案机构的风险评估模型,并编制风险清单,为档案机构实施风险管理提供参考。关键词:风险评估;档案的真实性;档案的完整性;档案的可访问性;电子档案管理【摘要】本研究目的在於建立符合國內機關檔案情境之電子檔案風險管理作業模式。採用疊慧法(Delphi)評核電子檔案風險管理之共識項目,建立機關檔案進行電子檔案風險自我檢核的指標,接續進行個案實證研究,以驗證風險檢核表之適用性,進而提出個案機關之電子檔案風險管理策略。本研究調查結果提出63項電子檔案風險檢核指標,可供機關進行風險評估作業運用;完成個案機關風險辨識與評估作業後,呈現多數指標落於低度風險區;根據風險評估結果,對於風險值3到4的指標,提供預防策略建議,對於風險值4以上指標,提供預防及減輕策略加以因應。本研究提出之電子檔案風險管理檢核表以及實務評估作業模式,可供各機關進行電子檔案風險管理實務操作之參考。關鍵字:風險評估、檔案真實性、檔案完整性、檔案可及性、電子檔案管理
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Library and Information Studies
Journal of Library and Information Studies INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信