Gus Dur’s Ijtihād Paradigm of Contemporary Fiqh in Indonesia

M. Dahlan, Zakiyuddin Baidlawy, S. Sugiono
{"title":"Gus Dur’s Ijtihād Paradigm of Contemporary Fiqh in Indonesia","authors":"M. Dahlan, Zakiyuddin Baidlawy, S. Sugiono","doi":"10.21580/ahkam.2019.29.2.4193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reveals Gus Dur's ijtihād paradigm of contemporary fiqh in Indonesia in answering the problems of life. This study is a type of library research by tracing Gus Dur's works, Gus Dur's thought studies and other related scientific studies. This research uses the approach of Milton K. Munitz's thinking and the frame of mind ‘Abd al-Majīd al-Najjār. This research found that the conservative ijtihād paradigm has led to conservative fiqh which is unable to establish dialectics between fiqh norms and socio-cultural and humanitarian values, which can even lead to radical Islamic movements and acts of terrorism. Therefore, Gus Dur's contemporary jurisprudential ijtihād paradigm is needed to build this dialectic. Theoretically, the Gus Dur ijtihād paradigm has characteristics promoting different socio-cultural and humanitarian values from Islamic reformers. In practical terms, the Gus Dur ijtihād paradigm has made Indonesian socio-cultural values a consideration in understanding and applying contemporary fiqh without changing existing fiqh norms. Gus Dur's contemporary fiqh has also become the basis for maintaining the Pancasila ideology, the 1945 Constitution, the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia and Unity in Diversity.","PeriodicalId":31042,"journal":{"name":"AlAhkam","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AlAhkam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21580/ahkam.2019.29.2.4193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper reveals Gus Dur's ijtihād paradigm of contemporary fiqh in Indonesia in answering the problems of life. This study is a type of library research by tracing Gus Dur's works, Gus Dur's thought studies and other related scientific studies. This research uses the approach of Milton K. Munitz's thinking and the frame of mind ‘Abd al-Majīd al-Najjār. This research found that the conservative ijtihād paradigm has led to conservative fiqh which is unable to establish dialectics between fiqh norms and socio-cultural and humanitarian values, which can even lead to radical Islamic movements and acts of terrorism. Therefore, Gus Dur's contemporary jurisprudential ijtihād paradigm is needed to build this dialectic. Theoretically, the Gus Dur ijtihād paradigm has characteristics promoting different socio-cultural and humanitarian values from Islamic reformers. In practical terms, the Gus Dur ijtihād paradigm has made Indonesian socio-cultural values a consideration in understanding and applying contemporary fiqh without changing existing fiqh norms. Gus Dur's contemporary fiqh has also become the basis for maintaining the Pancasila ideology, the 1945 Constitution, the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia and Unity in Diversity.
古斯·杜尔(Gus Dur)的Ijtihād印尼当代伊斯兰教的范式
本文揭示了Gus Dur在回答生活问题时提出的当代印尼fiqh的ijtihād范式。本研究是对杜的著作、思想研究及其他相关科学研究的一种图书馆研究。本研究采用了Milton K.Munitz的思想方法和Abd al-Majīd al-Najjār的心态框架。本研究发现,保守的ijtihād范式导致了保守的fiqh,无法在fiqh规范与社会文化和人道主义价值观之间建立辩证法,甚至可能导致激进的伊斯兰运动和恐怖主义行为。因此,建立这种辩证法需要古斯·杜尔的当代法学范式。从理论上讲,Gus Dur ijtihād范式具有促进不同于伊斯兰改革者的社会文化和人道主义价值观的特征。在实践中,Gus Dur ijtihād范式使印尼社会文化价值观成为理解和应用当代fiqh的一个考虑因素,而不改变现有的fiqh规范。Gus Dur的当代fiqh也成为维护Pancasila意识形态、1945年宪法、印度尼西亚共和国统一国家和多样性统一的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书