Comparison of methods to characterize the penetration of hot melt adhesive into paper

IF 0.9 4区 农林科学 Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, PAPER & WOOD
Mubarak Khlewee, W. Desisto, D. Bousfield
{"title":"Comparison of methods to characterize the penetration of hot melt adhesive into paper","authors":"Mubarak Khlewee, W. Desisto, D. Bousfield","doi":"10.1515/npprj-2022-0066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the use of hot melt adhesives in the production of paper-based packaging, the controlled penetration of the adhesive is important to obtain rapid setting rates, good bond strength, and the efficient use of adhesive. Measuring adhesive penetration depth has been limited to cross-sectional images, but quantifying the depth of penetration is difficult from these images. No quantitative method is well established in the literature. Four different techniques are compared to quantitatively measure adhesive penetration depth. Two methods involve separating the paperboard from the adhesive layer. Two other methods use of silicone oil penetration and mercury porosimetry to measure the decrease of pore volume after the adhesive is applied. These methods are compared with samples generated for various parameters. Experiments were conducted using a typical hot melt glue on uncoated and coated paperboard sample. Cross-sectional images from Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) confirm the penetration of some samples. The accuracy and repeatability of these methods were compared. Because of some issues with trying to repeatably remove the paper layer for the weight and thickness methods, and the time and cost of the mercury porosimeter method, the silicone oil method is a nice method to characterize the adhesive penetration depth.","PeriodicalId":19315,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Pulp & Paper Research Journal","volume":"38 1","pages":"147 - 155"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Pulp & Paper Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/npprj-2022-0066","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, PAPER & WOOD","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract In the use of hot melt adhesives in the production of paper-based packaging, the controlled penetration of the adhesive is important to obtain rapid setting rates, good bond strength, and the efficient use of adhesive. Measuring adhesive penetration depth has been limited to cross-sectional images, but quantifying the depth of penetration is difficult from these images. No quantitative method is well established in the literature. Four different techniques are compared to quantitatively measure adhesive penetration depth. Two methods involve separating the paperboard from the adhesive layer. Two other methods use of silicone oil penetration and mercury porosimetry to measure the decrease of pore volume after the adhesive is applied. These methods are compared with samples generated for various parameters. Experiments were conducted using a typical hot melt glue on uncoated and coated paperboard sample. Cross-sectional images from Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) confirm the penetration of some samples. The accuracy and repeatability of these methods were compared. Because of some issues with trying to repeatably remove the paper layer for the weight and thickness methods, and the time and cost of the mercury porosimeter method, the silicone oil method is a nice method to characterize the adhesive penetration depth.
表征热熔胶对纸张渗透的方法比较
摘要在纸基包装生产中使用热熔胶时,控制胶粘剂的渗透对获得快速的凝固速率、良好的粘接强度和高效的胶粘剂使用具有重要意义。胶粘剂渗透深度的测量仅限于横截面图像,但从这些图像中量化渗透深度是困难的。在文献中没有确定的定量方法。比较了四种不同的技术来定量测量胶粘剂的渗透深度。有两种方法涉及将纸板与粘合剂层分离。另外两种方法使用硅油渗透和汞孔隙度法来测量粘合剂应用后孔隙体积的减少。将这些方法与针对不同参数生成的样本进行了比较。采用典型的热熔胶对未涂布和涂布纸板样品进行了实验。扫描电子显微镜(SEM)的横截面图像证实了一些样品的渗透。比较了这些方法的准确度和重复性。由于重量和厚度法在试图重复去除纸层方面存在一些问题,以及汞孔隙度法的时间和成本,硅油法是表征粘合剂渗透深度的一种很好的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nordic Pulp & Paper Research Journal
Nordic Pulp & Paper Research Journal 工程技术-材料科学:纸与木材
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
62
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Nordic Pulp & Paper Research Journal (NPPRJ) is a peer-reviewed, international scientific journal covering to-date science and technology research in the areas of wood-based biomass: Pulp and paper: products and processes Wood constituents: characterization and nanotechnologies Bio-refining, recovery and energy issues Utilization of side-streams from pulping processes Novel fibre-based, sustainable and smart materials. The editors and the publisher are committed to high quality standards and rapid handling of the peer review and publication processes. Topics Cutting-edge topics such as, but not limited to, the following: Biorefining, energy issues Wood fibre characterization and nanotechnology Side-streams and new products from wood pulping processes Mechanical pulping Chemical pulping, recovery and bleaching Paper technology Paper chemistry and physics Coating Paper-ink-interactions Recycling Environmental issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信