In-vivo proton range verification for reducing the risk of permanent alopecia in medulloblastoma treatment

Q1 Health Professions
Giulia Lucconi , El-Hassan Bentefour , Deepak Samuel , Kenneth Weaver , Maryam Moteabbed , Hsiao-Ming Lu
{"title":"In-vivo proton range verification for reducing the risk of permanent alopecia in medulloblastoma treatment","authors":"Giulia Lucconi ,&nbsp;El-Hassan Bentefour ,&nbsp;Deepak Samuel ,&nbsp;Kenneth Weaver ,&nbsp;Maryam Moteabbed ,&nbsp;Hsiao-Ming Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.radmp.2021.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this work is the clinical commissioning of a recently developed in-vivo range verification system for the head treatment of pediatric medulloblastoma patients. Inaccurate beam range for such treatment could lead to either inadequate dose coverage of the target volume or excessive dose to the head skin resulting permanent alopecia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The <em>in-vivo</em> range verification system is designed to perform pre-treatment range verification and adjustment. An array of Si-diode detectors is to be placed on the patient immobilization mask in the exit direction of a whole-brain field; signal is analyzed, and the extracted water equivalent path length (WEPL) is compared to the expected one, revealing if a range correction is needed. The method was tested in solid water and anthropomorphic head phantom, with validation based on independent WEPL measurements. The measured WEPL were compared to those computed by the treatment planning system (TPS).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The accuracy for the WEPL measurements by the diode system in both solid water and anthropomorphic head phantom were on average within a millimeter from more accurate measurement by the dose-extinction technique, with the error range for the two phantoms as (0–1 ​mm) and (0–1.3 ​mm), respectively. When compared to the WEPL calculated by the treatment planning system, the measured values were on average within 1 ​% (range 0–3%) of the beam range. The accuracy of dose measurements by the diodes in the fall-off part of the depth dose profile was validated against the reference Markus chamber. No need for further correction (due to different beam parameters and detector dose ageing effects) was found.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The range verification workflow was successfully tested in the anthropomorphic head phantom. The performance of the <em>in-vivo</em> range verification system and related workflow meet the clinical requirements in terms of the needed WEPL accuracy for pretreatment range verification.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34051,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Medicine and Protection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.radmp.2021.07.001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Medicine and Protection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666555721000411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this work is the clinical commissioning of a recently developed in-vivo range verification system for the head treatment of pediatric medulloblastoma patients. Inaccurate beam range for such treatment could lead to either inadequate dose coverage of the target volume or excessive dose to the head skin resulting permanent alopecia.

Methods

The in-vivo range verification system is designed to perform pre-treatment range verification and adjustment. An array of Si-diode detectors is to be placed on the patient immobilization mask in the exit direction of a whole-brain field; signal is analyzed, and the extracted water equivalent path length (WEPL) is compared to the expected one, revealing if a range correction is needed. The method was tested in solid water and anthropomorphic head phantom, with validation based on independent WEPL measurements. The measured WEPL were compared to those computed by the treatment planning system (TPS).

Results

The accuracy for the WEPL measurements by the diode system in both solid water and anthropomorphic head phantom were on average within a millimeter from more accurate measurement by the dose-extinction technique, with the error range for the two phantoms as (0–1 ​mm) and (0–1.3 ​mm), respectively. When compared to the WEPL calculated by the treatment planning system, the measured values were on average within 1 ​% (range 0–3%) of the beam range. The accuracy of dose measurements by the diodes in the fall-off part of the depth dose profile was validated against the reference Markus chamber. No need for further correction (due to different beam parameters and detector dose ageing effects) was found.

Conclusions

The range verification workflow was successfully tested in the anthropomorphic head phantom. The performance of the in-vivo range verification system and related workflow meet the clinical requirements in terms of the needed WEPL accuracy for pretreatment range verification.

降低髓母细胞瘤治疗中永久性脱发风险的体内质子范围验证
目的:为小儿髓母细胞瘤患者的头部治疗,对新近开发的体内范围验证系统进行临床调试。这种治疗的光束范围不准确可能导致靶体积剂量覆盖不足或头部皮肤剂量过大导致永久性脱发。方法设计体内范围验证系统,进行预处理范围验证和调整。一组硅二极管探测器将被放置在患者固定面罩上,在全脑场的出口方向;对信号进行分析,并将提取的水等效路径长度(WEPL)与预期长度进行比较,以确定是否需要进行距离校正。该方法在固体水中和拟人化头部幻影中进行了测试,并基于独立的WEPL测量进行了验证。将测量的WEPL与治疗计划系统(TPS)计算的结果进行比较。结果二极管系统在固体水和拟人头部幻影中的WEPL测量精度与剂量消光技术的测量精度平均相差1毫米,误差范围分别为(0 ~ 1 mm)和(0 ~ 1.3 mm)。与处理计划系统计算的WEPL相比,测量值平均在光束范围的1%(范围0-3%)内。在参考Markus腔中验证了深度剂量分布衰减部分二极管剂量测量的准确性。不需要进一步校正(由于不同的光束参数和探测器剂量老化效应)。结论该范围验证工作流程在拟人头部幻影中得到了成功的验证。体内范围验证系统的性能及相关工作流程满足临床对预处理范围验证所需WEPL精度的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiation Medicine and Protection
Radiation Medicine and Protection Health Professions-Emergency Medical Services
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信